Files
ScadaBridge/docs/deployment/topology-guide.md
T
Joseph Doherty 7ebdcd370a perf(host): install CDC capture only when replication is configured
SiteLocalDbSetup.OnReady registered all ten replicated tables
unconditionally, so a deliberately unreplicated site node (site-b and
site-c on the rig) carried the full 30-trigger CDC set forever. Every
write to those tables paid two extra INSERTs plus a json_object
serialization of the whole row, inside the caller's own transaction, and
appended to an oplog nothing ever drains. Arch-review finding #5 (High),
repo half; the library half — trigger cleanup API and O(1) backlog — is
WP3.3.

The ten RegisterReplicated calls are now behind a guard on whether the
node has LocalDb:Replication:PeerAddress OR LocalDb:Replication:ApiKey.
Either key counts, and the OR is load-bearing rather than defensive:
replication is one bidirectional stream that exactly one side dials, so
only the initiator sets PeerAddress. Verified against the rig — site-a
node-a has PeerAddress + ApiKey, site-a node-b (passive) has ApiKey
alone, site-b/site-c have no Replication section at all. Keying on
PeerAddress alone would have stripped capture from every passive node and
silently made each pair converge in one direction only.

The load-bearing ordering documented in the file is preserved: DDL still
precedes registration, and the legacy migrator still runs unconditionally
after it — an unreplicated node must still absorb its pre-Phase-1 files,
and it has no peer for those rows to be invisible to.

Known residual, documented in-file and in the topology guide: a database
file first created by an older build keeps its stale __localdb_* triggers.
The guard decides whether triggers are installed, not whether existing
ones are removed, and the library has no removal API until WP3.3. Moot on
the docker rig, where a schema-change redeploy recreates the volumes.
The inverse is also now documented: enabling replication on a site that
has run without it does not baseline existing rows, since CDC never
recorded them in __localdb_row_version and the snapshot resync streams
from that ledger.

Tests: new SiteLocalDbCdcRegistrationTests asserts trigger presence and
absence via sqlite_master across all four config shapes (none, ApiKey
only, PeerAddress + ApiKey, and the notification-table exclusion), plus
DDL-still-runs and migrator-still-runs on the unreplicated branch.
SiteLocalDbWiringTests and the integration site-pair harness now
configure an ApiKey — mirroring the rig's passive node — so their
registration and convergence assertions still describe a replicating
node. 483/483 Host.Tests pass; the 20 offline LocalDb convergence tests
still pass.
2026-08-14 19:59:53 -04:00

13 KiB

ScadaBridge Cluster Topology Guide

Architecture Overview

ScadaBridge uses a hub-and-spoke architecture:

  • Central Cluster: Two-node active/standby Akka.NET cluster for management, UI, and coordination.
  • Site Clusters: Two-node active/standby Akka.NET clusters at each remote site for data collection and local processing.
%%{init: {'theme':'base', 'themeVariables': {'textColor':'#111111','lineColor':'#555555','edgeLabelBackground':'#ffffff','fontSize':'15px'}}}%%
flowchart TD
    USERS["Users<br/>(HTTPS / LB)"]

    subgraph CENTRAL["Central Cluster"]
        NA["Node A<br/>Active"]
        NB["Node B<br/>Standby"]
        NA <--> NB
    end

    USERS --> NA
    CENTRAL --> SITE01
    CENTRAL --> SITE02
    CENTRAL --> SITE03
    CENTRAL --> SITEN

    subgraph SITE01["Site 01"]
        S01A["A<br/>Active"]
        S01B["B<br/>Standby"]
    end
    subgraph SITE02["Site 02"]
        S02A["A<br/>Active"]
        S02B["B<br/>Standby"]
    end
    subgraph SITE03["Site 03"]
        S03A["A<br/>Active"]
        S03B["B<br/>Standby"]
    end
    subgraph SITEN["Site N"]
        SNA["A<br/>Active"]
        SNB["B<br/>Standby"]
    end

    classDef start fill:#d5e8d4,stroke:#82b366,color:#111111;
    classDef proc fill:#dae8fc,stroke:#6c8ebf,color:#111111;
    classDef dec fill:#fff2cc,stroke:#d6b656,color:#111111;
    classDef warn fill:#ffe6cc,stroke:#d79b00,color:#111111;
    classDef muted fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#999999,color:#666666;
    class USERS dec
    class CENTRAL proc
    class NA,S01A,S02A,S03A,SNA start
    class NB,S01B,S02B,S03B,SNB muted
    class SITE01,SITE02,SITE03,SITEN warn

Central Cluster Setup

Cluster Configuration

Both central nodes must be configured as seed nodes for each other:

Node A (central-01.example.com):

{
  "ScadaBridge": {
    "Node": {
      "Role": "Central",
      "NodeHostname": "central-01.example.com",
      "RemotingPort": 8081
    },
    "Cluster": {
      "SeedNodes": [
        "akka.tcp://scadabridge@central-01.example.com:8081",
        "akka.tcp://scadabridge@central-02.example.com:8081"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Node B (central-02.example.com):

{
  "ScadaBridge": {
    "Node": {
      "Role": "Central",
      "NodeHostname": "central-02.example.com",
      "RemotingPort": 8081
    },
    "Cluster": {
      "SeedNodes": [
        "akka.tcp://scadabridge@central-02.example.com:8081",
        "akka.tcp://scadabridge@central-01.example.com:8081"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Seed order is load-bearing — each node lists ITSELF first (decision 2026-07-22). Note Node B's list is the reverse of Node A's. Akka only lets seed-nodes[0] form a new cluster, so a node listing its partner first can never boot while that partner is down. StartupValidator rejects the boot if the ordering is wrong, comparing host and port; use the same spelling of the hostname in NodeHostname and in the seed URI, since Akka does no DNS canonicalisation (central-02 and central-02.example.com are different seed identities). See docs/requirements/Component-ClusterInfrastructure.md → Seed Node Ordering.

Cluster Behavior

  • Split-brain resolver: auto-down (AutoDowning provider, auto-down-unreachable-after = 15s) since the 2026-07-21 availability-over-partition-safety decision — the leader among the reachable members downs the unreachable peer, so a hard crash of either node fails over. Accepted trade: a real partition leaves both sides active until an operator restarts one. keep-oldest (with down-if-alone = on) remains a supported SplitBrainResolverStrategy value, but in a two-node cluster it cannot survive a crash of the oldest node. See docs/plans/2026-07-21-auto-down-availability-decision.md.
  • Minimum members: min-nr-of-members = 1 — a single node can form a cluster.
  • Failure detection: 2-second heartbeat interval, 10-second threshold.
  • Total failover time: ~25 seconds from node failure to singleton migration.
  • Singleton handover: Uses CoordinatedShutdown for graceful migration.

Shared State

Both central nodes share state through:

  • SQL Server: All configuration, deployment records, templates, and audit logs.
  • JWT signing key: Same JwtSigningKey in both nodes' configuration.
  • Data Protection keys: Shared key ring (stored in SQL Server or shared file path).

Load Balancer

A load balancer sits in front of both central nodes for the Blazor Server UI:

  • Health check: GET /health/ready
  • Protocol: HTTPS (TLS termination at LB or pass-through)
  • Sticky sessions: Not required (JWT + shared Data Protection keys)
  • If the active node fails, the LB routes to the standby (which becomes active after singleton migration).

Site Cluster Setup

Cluster Configuration

Each site has its own two-node cluster:

Site Node A (site-01-a.example.com):

{
  "ScadaBridge": {
    "Node": {
      "Role": "Site",
      "NodeHostname": "site-01-a.example.com",
      "SiteId": "plant-north",
      "RemotingPort": 8081
    },
    "Cluster": {
      "SeedNodes": [
        "akka.tcp://scadabridge@site-01-a.example.com:8081",
        "akka.tcp://scadabridge@site-01-b.example.com:8081"
      ]
    }
  }
}

Site Node B reverses this listsite-01-b first, site-01-a second — per the self-first seed rule above. It applies to site pairs exactly as it does to the central pair: without it, site-01-b cannot boot while site-01-a is down.

Site Cluster Behavior

  • Same split-brain resolver as central (auto-down, per the 2026-07-21 decision — see the Central Cluster Behavior note above).
  • Singleton actors: Site Deployment Manager migrates on failover.
  • Staggered instance startup: 50ms delay between Instance Actor creation to prevent reconnection storms.
  • SQLite persistence: each node owns its own consolidated LocalDb database, kept in step by asynchronous CDC replication over a gRPC sync stream (LocalDb Phase 1 + 2). The nodes do NOT share a SQLite file.
  • CDC capture triggers are installed only on a node that has replication configuredLocalDb:Replication:PeerAddress or LocalDb:Replication:ApiKey. Either key counts, because only the initiating half of a pair sets PeerAddress (one bidirectional stream, dialled by one side); the passive half carries the key alone. A deliberately unreplicated node — site-b and site-c on the rig — runs with no triggers at all and stops paying the per-write capture cost.

Turning replication ON for a site that has been running without it

Set the keys on both nodes and restart both. Two things to know before you do:

  • Existing rows are not baselined. Capture is change-data-capture: rows written while the node had no triggers were never recorded in __localdb_row_version, and LocalDb's snapshot resync streams from that ledger, so it will not ship them. The pair converges on everything written after the restart and stays silently divergent on everything before it. Start from a copy of one node's database on both sides, or accept that only new writes converge.
  • A node upgraded in place keeps stale triggers. The guard decides whether triggers are installed, not whether existing ones are removed, and the library has no removal API yet. A database file first created by a build that always registered keeps capturing until that lands. Recreating the node's data volume clears it — which is what a schema-change redeploy does on the docker rig, so the rig is unaffected.

Site Pair Upgrades — stop and start BOTH nodes together

A rolling upgrade of a site pair, one node at a time, is no longer supported. It worked while the bespoke replicator kept a legacy SfBufferSnapshot compatibility handler so a new standby could still apply an old active node's monolithic snapshot. LocalDb Phase 2 deleted that handler along with the replicator, so a mixed-version pair has no common replication path: the two nodes will run, but they will not converge, and the divergence is silent.

Stop both nodes of a site pair, upgrade both, then start both.

Related bound — do not leave one node of a pair offline for long. A node absent for longer than LocalDb:Replication:TombstoneRetention (default 7 days) can resurrect deleted rows when it rejoins: deletes replicate as HLC-ordered tombstones, and once a tombstone is pruned there is nothing left to suppress the stale row the returning node still holds. Within the retention window a rejoin is safe and self-correcting (verified live: a node stopped and restarted mid-load rejoined with both nodes byte-identical and zero duplicates). Beyond it, rebuild the returning node's database from its peer rather than letting it rejoin.

Central-Site Communication

Three transports cross the boundary, not one — all now gRPC or HTTP; Akka ClusterClient was removed in Phase 4 of the ClusterClient→gRPC migration (2026-07-23), and Akka remoting no longer crosses the boundary at all:

  • gRPC command/control — both directions, on sticky-failover channel pairs, dialled directly (no receptionist, no "active central" to identify — each side dials both of the peer's node endpoints):
    • Site → central to the central-hosted CentralControlService (GrpcCentralTransport): the site lists the central nodes' gRPC endpoints in ScadaBridge:Communication:CentralGrpcEndpoints (e.g. http://scadabridge-central-a:8083, the central's CentralGrpcPort, default 8083 — direct h2c, not via Traefik, which is HTTP/1 only). A Site node must list at least one; central nodes leave it empty.
    • Central → site to the site-hosted SiteCommandService (GrpcSiteTransport): central dials the site's GrpcNodeAAddress / GrpcNodeBAddress (from the Site entity), NodeA→NodeB failover.
  • gRPC streaming + audit pull — real-time data and audit/telemetry pull on the site-hosted SiteStreamService. Note the direction is inverted from the data flow: each site node hosts the server on GrpcPort (default 8083, h2c) and central dials in.
  • Plain HTTP — the deploy config itself, fetched by the site with a per-deployment token.

gRPC control-plane preshared key (required)

Every site node must set ScadaBridge:Communication:GrpcPsk, and central must hold the same value for that site. StartupValidator refuses to boot a site node without it, deliberately: the gate is fail-closed, so an unset key would leave the node joined, healthy-looking and answering heartbeats while refusing every gRPC call — no live subscriptions, no audit pull, no cached-telemetry ingest.

Side Where the key lives
Site node (both nodes of the pair, identical) ScadaBridge:Communication:GrpcPsk, in production ${secret:SB-GRPC-PSK-<siteId>}
Central secret SB-GRPC-PSK-<siteId> in its store — or ScadaBridge:Communication:SitePsks:<siteId>

The store is the source that matters in production, because sites are added at runtime and their keys cannot be enumerated in configuration at boot; SitePsks covers a host running without a master key (the docker rig) and one-off pins.

One key per site, never one for the fleet: a compromised site must not yield another site's key. And never share it with LocalDb:Replication:ApiKey — that authenticates the pair partner for database replication, a different trust relationship on the same listener.

Rotation: set the new value on both sides, then restart the pair (pairs restart together anyway — see above). Upgrading to a build that has this gate requires seeding the key first, including in the on-host deploy/ overlays.

The key is a bearer token over plaintext h2c, so it is readable and replayable by anyone on the path. That is the accepted posture today — the same trusted-network assumption the boundary already made, now with authentication rather than none. TLS on these listeners is follow-on hardening and needs no change to the key design.

Scaling Guidelines

Target Scale

  • 10 sites maximum per central cluster
  • 500 machines (instances) total across all sites
  • 75 tags per machine (37,500 total tag subscriptions)

Resource Requirements

Component CPU RAM Disk Notes
Central node 4 cores 8 GB 50 GB SQL Server is separate
Site node 2 cores 4 GB 20 GB SQLite databases grow with S&F
SQL Server 4 cores 16 GB 100 GB Shared across central cluster

Network Bandwidth

  • Health reports: ~1 KB per site per 30 seconds = negligible
  • Tag value updates: Depends on data change rate; OPC UA subscription-based
  • Deployment artifacts: One-time burst per deployment (varies by config size)
  • Debug view streaming: ~500 bytes per attribute change per subscriber

Dual-Node Failure Recovery

Scenario: Both Nodes Down

  1. First node starts: Forms a single-node cluster (min-nr-of-members = 1).
  2. Central: Reconnects to SQL Server, reads deployment state, becomes operational.
  3. Site: Opens SQLite databases, rebuilds Instance Actors from persisted configs, resumes S&F retries.
  4. Second node starts: Joins the existing cluster as standby.

Automatic Recovery

No manual intervention required for dual-node failure. The first node to start will:

  • Form the cluster
  • Take over all singletons
  • Begin processing immediately
  • Accept the second node when it joins