mbproxy: strip historical phase/wave/plan references from source comments
Comments described the *history* of how the code arrived (phase numbers, wave IDs, review IDs, dated TODOs) instead of what it does today. That scaffolding rotted as the codebase evolved. Cleaned 60 source files + .gitignore; behaviour unchanged (387/387 tests still pass). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@ namespace Mbproxy.Proxy.Cache;
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// Hash key for the per-PLC <see cref="ResponseCache"/>. Structurally identical to
|
||||
/// Phase 10's <see cref="CoalescingKey"/> — both keys discriminate the same dimensions
|
||||
/// (UnitId, FunctionCode, StartAddress, Quantity), but the two type aliases live in
|
||||
/// different namespaces so the two phases can evolve independently without one shaping
|
||||
/// the other's API surface.
|
||||
/// the read-coalescing <see cref="CoalescingKey"/> — both keys discriminate the same
|
||||
/// dimensions (UnitId, FunctionCode, StartAddress, Quantity), but the two type aliases
|
||||
/// live in different namespaces so the cache and the coalescer can evolve independently
|
||||
/// without one shaping the other's API surface.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// <para><b>Equality semantics:</b> record-struct value equality. FC03 and FC04 produce
|
||||
/// different keys for the same address (different Modbus tables); different
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user