Files
scadaproj/components/ui-theme/GAPS.md
T
2026-06-01 05:15:38 -04:00

91 lines
5.1 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# UI Theme — gaps & adoption backlog
Divergence of each project from [`spec/SPEC.md`](spec/SPEC.md), and the ordered backlog to
reach adoption of the `ZB.MOM.WW.Theme` shared RCL. Status legend: ⛔ gap · 🟡 partial · ✅ matches.
---
## Divergence vs spec
### §1 Design tokens — `theme.css`
| Item | OtOpcUa | MxAccessGateway | ScadaBridge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens identical to canonical | ✅ identical | ✅ identical | ✅ identical |
| File maintained in one place (RCL) | ⛔ own copy | ⛔ own copy | ⛔ own copy |
| Font path `url('../fonts/…')` | ⛔ `url('fonts/…')`**latent 404** | 🟡 `url('/fonts/…')` — absolute, not portable | ✅ `url('../fonts/…')` — correct |
| IBM Plex fonts in one place | ⛔ own `wwwroot/fonts/` | ⛔ own `wwwroot/fonts/` | ⛔ own `wwwroot/fonts/` |
**Gap T1:** All three apps maintain a copy of `theme.css` — the single-source guarantee
is broken today. Any token change must be applied in four places (three apps + the RCL)
once the RCL exists.
**Gap T2:** OtOpcUa `url('fonts/…')` is a latent 404 masked by system-font fallback.
Adoption fixes it automatically.
**Gap T3:** Each app vendors fonts — 3× duplication. The RCL eliminates it.
### §2 Typography
All three apps reference IBM Plex via the token stacks. No typography divergence — the
token values are identical. Gap is delivery (T3 above).
### §3 Canonical side-rail layout
| Item | OtOpcUa | MxAccessGateway | ScadaBridge |
|---|---|---|---|
| `.app-shell` root element | ✅ `div.app-shell` | ⛔ `div.d-flex …` (no `.app-shell`) | ⛔ `div.d-flex …` (no `.app-shell`) |
| Rail CSS class | ✅ `.side-rail` | ⛔ `.sidebar` | ⛔ `.sidebar` |
| Nav item CSS class | ✅ `.rail-link` | ⛔ `.nav-link` | ⛔ `.nav-link` |
| Nav item element | ✅ `<a>` (NavLink) | ⛔ `<li><NavLink>` inside `<ul>` | ⛔ `<li><NavLink>` inside `<ul>` |
| Shell component | ⛔ bespoke `MainLayout` + `NavSidebar` | ⛔ combined `MainLayout` (210 lines) | ⛔ `MainLayout` + `NavMenu` |
| Thin-MainLayout pattern | ⛔ not yet | ⛔ not yet | ⛔ not yet |
**Gap L1:** OtOpcUa already uses the right CSS classes but the component structure
doesn't use `ThemeShell`. Low-risk migration.
**Gap L2:** MxAccessGateway and ScadaBridge use `.sidebar` / `.nav-link` / `<ul><li>`.
Migration requires class name changes throughout their nav markup and `site.css` sidebar
blocks. Medium (ScadaBridge) to high (MxGateway combined layout) risk.
### §4 Component contract
| Component | OtOpcUa | MxAccessGateway | ScadaBridge |
|---|---|---|---|
| `StatusPill` (vs bespoke `StatusBadge`) | ⛔ `StatusBadge` (string CSS class) | ⛔ `StatusBadge` (string text → class) | ⛔ raw `.chip-*` classes inline |
| `LoginCard` | ⛔ inline markup in `Login.razor` | ⛔ no Blazor login page | ⛔ Bootstrap `.card` markup in `Login.razor` |
| `NavRailItem` / `NavRailSection` | ⛔ `NavLink` + `NavSection` (interactive) | ⛔ `NavLink`+`<li>` + `NavSection` | ⛔ `NavLink`+`<li>` + `NavSection` |
| `ThemeShell` / thin `MainLayout` | ⛔ not yet | ⛔ not yet | ⛔ not yet |
| `ThemeHead` | ⛔ manual `<link>` tags | ⛔ manual `<link>` tags | ⛔ manual `<link>` tags |
### §5 Delivery
| Item | OtOpcUa | MxAccessGateway | ScadaBridge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset via `_content/ZB.MOM.WW.Theme/…` | ⛔ `_content/…AdminUI/css/…` | ⛔ root-relative `/css/…` | ⛔ `_content/…CentralUI/css/…` |
| `<ThemeHead />` in `<head>` | ⛔ manual `<link>` tags | ⛔ manual `<link>` tags | ⛔ manual `<link>` tags |
---
## Adoption backlog (ordered)
| # | Item | Projects | Priority | Effort | Risk | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Build `ZB.MOM.WW.Theme` RCL | scadaproj | High | M | Low | **DONE**`0.1.0` built + tested in this repo |
| 2 | Adopt in OtOpcUa AdminUI | OtOpcUa | High | S | Low | Already rail; fix latent font 404; cookie nav-state optional retain |
| 3 | Adopt in ScadaBridge CentralUI + Host | ScadaBridge | Med | M | Med | Sidebar class migration + `MainLayout` replace; scoped `.razor.css` unchanged |
| 4 | Adopt in MxAccessGateway Dashboard | MxAccessGateway | Low | L | High | Combined `MainLayout` migration; sidebar idiom change; largest UX-visible change — verify visually |
**Sequencing:** #2 first (lowest risk, validates the adoption pattern); #3 next (medium
effort, no design change); #4 last (highest risk — verify dashboard UX thoroughly before
merging). Each adoption is a per-repo PR, independent.
---
## Open questions
- **MxGateway login:** No Blazor login page today. If one is added during adoption (#4),
use `<LoginCard>`. If the server-redirect pattern is kept, `<LoginCard>` is not needed.
- **OtOpcUa cookie nav state:** Decide whether to retain `otopcua_nav` cookie persistence
(keep bespoke interactive `NavSection` alongside `ThemeShell`'s `Nav` slot) or drop it
(CSS-only `NavRailSection` replaces it, losing expand-state persistence across page loads).
- **ScadaBridge `AuthorizeView` policy gating in nav:** Verify `<NavRailSection>` inside
`<AuthorizeView>` renders + hides correctly with the canonical SSR rendering model.