Files
scadaproj/ZB.MOM.WW.LocalDb/Directory.Build.props
T
Joseph Doherty 41bdc178c2 fix(localdb): refuse cascade-delete FK parents; make one entry's row+ledger writes atomic (0.3.3, ScadaBridge arch-review P4-7)
Two halves of the same INSERT OR REPLACE hazard in the LWW apply path. Wire-compatible
with every earlier peer: no proto change, no lib_schema_version bump, no on-disk schema
change.

1. RegisterReplicated now REFUSES a table that another table references with a
   row-mutating ON DELETE action (CASCADE / SET NULL / SET DEFAULT). Applying a remote row
   uses INSERT OR REPLACE, whose implicit DELETE fires that referential action — while the
   apply path holds the capture guard raised, precisely so its own writes are not
   re-captured. The child rows it deletes or nulls therefore produce no oplog entry: the
   peer keeps them and the pair diverges with nothing reporting a fault. Registration is
   the only point at which the problem is still visible, so it is refused there with an
   actionable LocalDbRegistrationException naming the referencing table and its action.
   NO ACTION / RESTRICT stay allowed: they mutate no child row, so the implicit delete just
   fails and the applier dead-letters the entry — loud, not silent. Registration-time only;
   a cascading child table created LATER is not caught (SQLite offers no DDL hook).

   No current consumer has a foreign key on a replicated table (ScadaBridge's ten tables
   have none), so this is a guard against a future foot-gun, not a live fix.

2. One entry's row write and its ledger write are now atomic. They were two statements
   under the poison catch, so a failure landing between them committed a deleted/replaced
   row carrying a STALE LIVE row-version entry — exactly the shape SnapshotStreamer warns
   about and skips, so that key never travels again and the pair is permanently divergent
   for it. A per-entry SAVEPOINT makes the pair all-or-nothing while keeping the catch's
   per-ENTRY granularity: entries applied earlier in the same batch survive the rollback,
   the poison entry is still dead-lettered, and the batch still continues. The RELEASE runs
   outside the catch on purpose, so a failure there rolls the whole batch back rather than
   being swallowed as poison. Measured cost on a 100k-row backlog drain: ~7%
   (178.6k rows/s -> 166.1k rows/s).

Tests: both hazards proven against the unfixed code first (FK parent registered silently;
an injected ledger-write abort left the row deleted with a live ledger entry). Adds FK
guard coverage (parent refused, child allowed, SET NULL / SET DEFAULT refused, NO ACTION /
RESTRICT allowed, unrelated cascades ignored) and two applier atomicity tests. The
statement-count lock-in moves 7 -> 9 for the two new savepoint statements.

Version 0.3.2 -> 0.3.3; README limitations + release notes document the constraint.
2026-08-19 16:22:44 -04:00

25 lines
1.1 KiB
XML

<Project>
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>net10.0</TargetFramework>
<Nullable>enable</Nullable>
<ImplicitUsings>enable</ImplicitUsings>
<LangVersion>latest</LangVersion>
<Version>0.3.3</Version>
<ManagePackageVersionsCentrally>true</ManagePackageVersionsCentrally>
<TreatWarningsAsErrors>true</TreatWarningsAsErrors>
<!-- NU1510 (package-pruning advice): the Replication and Tests projects carry a
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App FrameworkReference AND explicit PackageReferences to
in-framework packages (Hosting/Logging/DI/Configuration), as required by the
library layout. The advice is benign; keep the explicit refs and silence it. -->
<NoWarn>$(NoWarn);NU1510</NoWarn>
<PackageReadmeFile>README.md</PackageReadmeFile>
</PropertyGroup>
<!-- Embed the repo README in each packable nupkg (ignored by non-packable projects). -->
<ItemGroup Condition="'$(IsPackable)' == 'true'">
<None Include="$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)README.md" Pack="true" PackagePath="\" Visible="false" />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>