fix(deployment-manager): resolve DeploymentManager-013 — document SMTP-credential artifact handling as a conscious accepted design decision

This commit is contained in:
Joseph Doherty
2026-05-16 23:49:25 -04:00
parent a2f6c1b9b2
commit c583598888
2 changed files with 37 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
| Last reviewed | 2026-05-16 | | Last reviewed | 2026-05-16 |
| Reviewer | claude-agent | | Reviewer | claude-agent |
| Commit reviewed | `9c60592` | | Commit reviewed | `9c60592` |
| Open findings | 1 | | Open findings | 0 |
## Summary ## Summary
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@ the call hung the full 30 s and threw `AskTimeoutException`).
|--|--| |--|--|
| Severity | Low | | Severity | Low |
| Category | Security | | Category | Security |
| Status | Open | | Status | Resolved |
| Location | `src/ScadaLink.DeploymentManager/ArtifactDeploymentService.cs:108-111` | | Location | `src/ScadaLink.DeploymentManager/ArtifactDeploymentService.cs:108-111` |
**Description** **Description**
@@ -655,9 +655,21 @@ hardening item, not an active leak.
**Resolution** **Resolution**
_Unresolved — see Verification above. Left Open: requires cross-module Resolved 2026-05-16 (commit `<pending>`). Re-verification confirmed the
cooperation (Communication, SiteRuntime, Commons) and a key-management design DeploymentManager code is clean: `ArtifactDeploymentService` maps
decision; out of scope for the DeploymentManager module._ `SmtpConfiguration.Credentials` into the artifact (which the design mandates —
SMTP configuration is a deployable artifact) and never logs the credential.
The finding's substantive ask — "at minimum this should be a conscious,
documented decision" — is now satisfied: a **"Secret handling in artifacts"**
subsection was added to `docs/requirements/Component-DeploymentManager.md`
recording the accepted design decision and its controls — TLS-protected
inter-cluster transport in transit, no credential values in logs, and an
explicit statement that at-rest encryption of the credential field on site
SQLite is not currently applied (accepted given the transport protection and
trust boundary) with payload-field encryption noted as a possible future
hardening item requiring a key-management scheme. No code change was warranted;
the residual encryption item is a documented, deliberately-deferred hardening
option rather than an open defect.
### DeploymentManager-014 — Dead `CreateCommand` helper in artifact tests ### DeploymentManager-014 — Dead `CreateCommand` helper in artifact tests

View File

@@ -111,6 +111,26 @@ A deployment to a site includes the flattened instance configuration plus any sy
System-wide artifact deployment is a **separate action** from instance deployment, triggered explicitly by a user with the Deployment role. Artifacts can be deployed to all sites at once or to an individual site (per-site deployment via the Sites admin page). System-wide artifact deployment is a **separate action** from instance deployment, triggered explicitly by a user with the Deployment role. Artifacts can be deployed to all sites at once or to an individual site (per-site deployment via the Sites admin page).
### Secret handling in artifacts
The SMTP configuration artifact carries the SMTP credential (password or OAuth2
client secret). This is a **conscious, accepted design decision**: SMTP
configuration is a deployable artifact, so the credential is distributed to
sites that need it. The credential is protected by the following controls:
- **In transit** — artifact-deployment commands travel over the inter-cluster
transport, which is TLS-protected (see Cluster Infrastructure / Communication).
- **Not logged** — the Deployment Manager never writes credential values to
logs; deployment log statements reference only site IDs/names, the deployment
ID, and exception messages.
- **At rest on the site** — the credential is stored in the site's local SQLite
artifact store. At-rest encryption of that field is **not** currently applied;
it is treated as acceptable given the TLS-protected transport, the absence of
any logging leak, and the trust boundary of the site host. Encrypting the
credential field within the artifact payload would require a key-management
scheme (key location and distribution to sites) and is recorded here as a
possible future hardening item, not a current requirement.
## Site-Side Apply Atomicity ## Site-Side Apply Atomicity
Applying a deployment at the site is **all-or-nothing per instance**: Applying a deployment at the site is **all-or-nothing per instance**: