Files
mxaccessgw/docs/Authorization.md
T
2026-04-29 07:27:00 -04:00

215 lines
12 KiB
Markdown

# Gateway gRPC Authorization
The authorization subsystem enforces per-RPC scope checks against the authenticated `ApiKeyIdentity` produced by the authentication layer, so service implementations never need to repeat permission logic.
## Overview
Authorization runs as a single gRPC server interceptor registered for every call on the gateway. It pulls the authenticated identity for the current request, derives the scope that the request type requires, and either lets the call continue or fails the call with a gRPC status. The pipeline keeps service classes free of cross-cutting checks, which matches the AGENTS.md "thin gRPC layer" rule that service handlers translate between contracts and domain code without owning policy.
The participating types live under `src/MxGateway.Server/Security/Authorization/`:
- `GatewayGrpcAuthorizationInterceptor` runs the authenticate-then-authorize pipeline for unary and server-streaming calls.
- `GatewayGrpcScopeResolver` maps a request message (and, for `MxCommandRequest`, the inner `MxCommandKind`) to the scope string that must be present on the caller.
- `GatewayScopes` exposes the canonical scope constants used by the resolver and any downstream consumer.
- `GatewayRequestIdentityAccessor` and `IGatewayRequestIdentityAccessor` expose the verified identity to handlers and any service code that runs inside the call.
- `GrpcAuthorizationServiceCollectionExtensions` wires the components into the DI container and the gRPC pipeline.
The `ApiKeyIdentity` consumed here is produced by the authentication layer; see [Authentication](./Authentication.md) for how it is built and how scopes are persisted.
## Why an Interceptor
Centralizing the policy in `GatewayGrpcAuthorizationInterceptor` produces three concrete benefits:
1. Every RPC defined in `MxAccessGatewayService` is covered by construction. A new RPC inherits the check the moment its request type is added to `GatewayGrpcScopeResolver`, instead of relying on each service method to remember to call an authorization helper.
2. The service class stays a thin translator between proto contracts and domain calls. RPC methods do not branch on identity or scope, which keeps the AGENTS.md guideline that gRPC handlers contain no policy.
3. Authentication and authorization happen in one place, so the gRPC `Status` mapping is consistent. A failed key check always returns `Unauthenticated`, and a missing scope always returns `PermissionDenied` with the offending scope name.
## Interceptor Flow
`GatewayGrpcAuthorizationInterceptor` overrides both `UnaryServerHandler` and `ServerStreamingServerHandler`. Both call the same private `AuthenticateAndAuthorizeAsync` helper before invoking the continuation, then push the resolved identity onto the accessor for the duration of the call.
```csharp
public override async Task<TResponse> UnaryServerHandler<TRequest, TResponse>(
TRequest request,
ServerCallContext context,
UnaryServerMethod<TRequest, TResponse> continuation)
{
ApiKeyIdentity? identity = await AuthenticateAndAuthorizeAsync(request, context).ConfigureAwait(false);
IDisposable? identityScope = identity is null ? null : identityAccessor.Push(identity);
using (identityScope)
{
return await continuation(request, context).ConfigureAwait(false);
}
}
```
The shared helper performs the actual decision:
```csharp
if (options.Value.Authentication.Mode == AuthenticationMode.Disabled)
{
return null;
}
string? authorizationHeader = context.RequestHeaders.GetValue("authorization");
ApiKeyVerificationResult verificationResult = await apiKeyVerifier
.VerifyAsync(authorizationHeader, context.CancellationToken)
.ConfigureAwait(false);
if (!verificationResult.Succeeded || verificationResult.Identity is null)
{
throw new RpcException(new Status(
StatusCode.Unauthenticated,
"Missing or invalid API key."));
}
string requiredScope = scopeResolver.ResolveRequiredScope(request);
if (!verificationResult.Identity.Scopes.Contains(requiredScope))
{
throw new RpcException(new Status(
StatusCode.PermissionDenied,
$"API key is missing required scope '{requiredScope}'."));
}
return verificationResult.Identity;
```
The flow is:
1. If `GatewayOptions.Authentication.Mode` is `AuthenticationMode.Disabled`, the helper returns `null` immediately. No identity is pushed onto the accessor and the continuation runs without scope enforcement. This matches the `AuthenticationMode` enum, which only defines `ApiKey` and `Disabled`.
2. Otherwise, the `authorization` request header is read directly off `ServerCallContext.RequestHeaders` and handed to `IApiKeyVerifier.VerifyAsync`. A failed verification or a missing identity throws `RpcException` with `StatusCode.Unauthenticated`.
3. `GatewayGrpcScopeResolver.ResolveRequiredScope(request)` produces the scope string. If the identity's `Scopes` set does not contain it, the helper throws `RpcException` with `StatusCode.PermissionDenied` and embeds the missing scope name in `Status.Detail` so callers can diagnose the failure.
4. On success, the verified `ApiKeyIdentity` is returned and pushed onto `IGatewayRequestIdentityAccessor` for the lifetime of the call.
The status codes are deliberately distinct: `Unauthenticated` signals "we do not know who you are," and `PermissionDenied` signals "we know who you are, but you cannot do this." Treating the two as the same code would make troubleshooting harder for client implementations.
## Scope Resolution
`GatewayGrpcScopeResolver` is a stateless singleton that switches on the runtime request type. Top-level RPC requests map directly:
```csharp
public string ResolveRequiredScope(object request)
{
return request switch
{
OpenSessionRequest => GatewayScopes.SessionOpen,
CloseSessionRequest => GatewayScopes.SessionClose,
StreamEventsRequest => GatewayScopes.EventsRead,
MxCommandRequest commandRequest => ResolveCommandScope(commandRequest.Command?.Kind ?? MxCommandKind.Unspecified),
_ => GatewayScopes.Admin
};
}
```
The `_ => GatewayScopes.Admin` fallback is intentional: any future request type that the resolver does not recognize fails closed, requiring the strongest scope until the resolver is updated.
`MxCommandRequest` is special because it multiplexes many MxAccess operations through a single RPC. The resolver inspects the embedded `MxCommandKind` so each operation gets its own scope:
```csharp
private static string ResolveCommandScope(MxCommandKind kind)
{
return kind switch
{
MxCommandKind.Write or
MxCommandKind.Write2 => GatewayScopes.InvokeWrite,
MxCommandKind.WriteSecured or
MxCommandKind.WriteSecured2 or
MxCommandKind.AuthenticateUser => GatewayScopes.InvokeSecure,
MxCommandKind.ArchestraUserToId or
MxCommandKind.GetSessionState or
MxCommandKind.GetWorkerInfo => GatewayScopes.MetadataRead,
MxCommandKind.DrainEvents => GatewayScopes.EventsRead,
MxCommandKind.ShutdownWorker => GatewayScopes.Admin,
_ => GatewayScopes.InvokeRead
};
}
```
Reads (`Register`, `AddItem`, `Advise`, and any other unspecified kind) fall through to `InvokeRead`, which keeps the matrix small while still separating reads from writes, secured writes, metadata lookups, event drains, and worker shutdown.
## Scope Catalog
`GatewayScopes` is the single source of truth for scope strings. Every entry is currently mapped by either the resolver or another security component:
| Constant | Value | Required For |
|----------|-------|--------------|
| `SessionOpen` | `session:open` | `OpenSessionRequest` |
| `SessionClose` | `session:close` | `CloseSessionRequest` |
| `EventsRead` | `events:read` | `StreamEventsRequest`, `MxCommandKind.DrainEvents` |
| `InvokeRead` | `invoke:read` | `MxCommandRequest` for read-style command kinds (`Register`, `AddItem`, `Advise`, and any kind not otherwise mapped) |
| `InvokeWrite` | `invoke:write` | `MxCommandKind.Write`, `MxCommandKind.Write2` |
| `InvokeSecure` | `invoke:secure` | `MxCommandKind.WriteSecured`, `MxCommandKind.WriteSecured2`, `MxCommandKind.AuthenticateUser` |
| `MetadataRead` | `metadata:read` | `MxCommandKind.ArchestraUserToId`, `MxCommandKind.GetSessionState`, `MxCommandKind.GetWorkerInfo`, `GalaxyRepository.TestConnection`, `GalaxyRepository.GetLastDeployTime`, `GalaxyRepository.DiscoverHierarchy`, `GalaxyRepository.WatchDeployEvents` |
| `Admin` | `admin` | `MxCommandKind.ShutdownWorker`, the default for any unrecognized request type, and the dashboard authorization policy |
The `Admin` constant is also referenced by `DashboardAuthenticator` and `DashboardAuthorizationHandler` so that the dashboard and the gRPC layer agree on what "admin" means.
## Identity Access for Downstream Layers
Once authorization passes, `GatewayGrpcAuthorizationInterceptor` calls `identityAccessor.Push(identity)` and disposes the returned scope when the continuation completes. `GatewayRequestIdentityAccessor` stores the active identity in an `AsyncLocal<ApiKeyIdentity?>`, so the value flows across `await` boundaries and child tasks belonging to the same request.
```csharp
public sealed class GatewayRequestIdentityAccessor : IGatewayRequestIdentityAccessor
{
private readonly AsyncLocal<ApiKeyIdentity?> currentIdentity = new();
public ApiKeyIdentity? Current => currentIdentity.Value;
public IDisposable Push(ApiKeyIdentity identity)
{
ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(identity);
ApiKeyIdentity? previousIdentity = currentIdentity.Value;
currentIdentity.Value = identity;
return new IdentityScope(this, previousIdentity);
}
}
```
The returned `IdentityScope` restores the previous value on dispose rather than clearing it. This makes the accessor safe for nested pushes, even though the current interceptor only pushes once per call. Disposing twice is a no-op because of the `disposed` guard inside `IdentityScope`.
Downstream code consumes the accessor through the `IGatewayRequestIdentityAccessor` interface:
```csharp
public interface IGatewayRequestIdentityAccessor
{
ApiKeyIdentity? Current { get; }
IDisposable Push(ApiKeyIdentity identity);
}
```
`MxAccessGatewayService` takes `IGatewayRequestIdentityAccessor` as a constructor dependency and reads `Current` whenever it needs to attach the calling identity to a domain operation, which keeps the service free of header parsing or scope checks.
When `AuthenticationMode.Disabled` is configured, no identity is pushed, so `Current` returns `null`. Downstream code must tolerate that, just as it tolerates the absence of a scope check.
## Registration
`GrpcAuthorizationServiceCollectionExtensions.AddGatewayGrpcAuthorization` is the single entry point that registers every component and inserts the interceptor into the gRPC pipeline:
```csharp
public static IServiceCollection AddGatewayGrpcAuthorization(this IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddSingleton<GatewayGrpcScopeResolver>();
services.AddSingleton<IGatewayRequestIdentityAccessor, GatewayRequestIdentityAccessor>();
services.AddSingleton<GatewayGrpcAuthorizationInterceptor>();
services.AddGrpc(options => options.Interceptors.Add<GatewayGrpcAuthorizationInterceptor>());
return services;
}
```
Singleton lifetimes are appropriate because none of the three classes hold per-request state on instance fields; the request-scoped value lives inside the `AsyncLocal` on `GatewayRequestIdentityAccessor`. `GatewayApplication` calls `builder.Services.AddGatewayGrpcAuthorization()` during startup, and the call also performs `AddGrpc`, so the gateway never registers gRPC without the interceptor attached.
## Related Documentation
- [Authentication](./Authentication.md)
- [Grpc](./Grpc.md)
- [GatewayConfiguration](./GatewayConfiguration.md)
- [Galaxy Repository Browse](./GalaxyRepository.md)