Joseph Doherty 5b681ee59b fix(SEC-31,SEC-32): identify a probe-slot reservation by version, not by timestamp
ReleaseProbe recognised its own reservation by comparing NextProbeAtTicks to
now + _probeIntervalTicks. RecordInto's rearm-on-trip writes that identical
expression, so a concurrent RecordFailure on the same WindowState whose `now`
lands on the claimer's tick — routine at ~1 ms clock resolution under load — was
mistaken for the caller's own claim. The release then stomped the legitimate
fresh re-arm back to the stale previousProbeAtTicks, which is already due, handing
the next arrival a free probe the re-arm had just closed.

WindowState gains a monotonic ProbeVersion bumped by every writer of
NextProbeAtTicks (TryConsumeProbe's claim and RecordInto's re-arm alike).
TryConsumeProbe returns the stamp it set as part of a ProbeClaim; ReleaseProbe
restores the previous value only while the state's version still equals that
stamp, checking and restoring in one lock(state) section and bumping the version
again on restore so no other stale release can match either.

Test: ProbeSlotRestore_DoesNotStompConcurrentRearmAtSameTick, with the clock held
still so the claim and the interleaved failure necessarily share a tick. Making it
deterministic needed a seam — the claim-to-release window is a few nanoseconds and
racing threads do not hit it (an earlier thread-based attempt passed against the
defective guard three runs out of three, and its end state was ordering-dependent
rather than correctness-dependent, so it was dropped rather than shipped as
theatre). The seam is an internal ProbeReleaseInterleaveHook, null in production,
costing one null check on the already-refused path. Verified as a genuine red
against the timestamp guard: Expected ThrottledByPeer, Actual ProbeAdmitted.
2026-08-07 06:10:14 -04:00
S
Description
No description provided
35 MiB
Languages
Java 43.9%
C# 43.6%
Python 3.4%
Rust 3.4%
Go 2.9%
Other 2.7%