Extended AlarmClientWmProbeTests.ProbeAlarmClientWmMessages to also call GetStatistics every ~2s during the pump window. Re-ran on the dev rig 2026-05-01: - GetStatistics is safely callable from the same thread that did RegisterConsumer + Subscribe. Every poll (9 calls / 20s window) returned rc=0, no exceptions. - Galaxy currently has zero active alarms. total=0 active=0 suppressed=0 newAlarms=0 across every poll. positions[] and handles[] arrays were empty. - changes=1 codes=[7] was constant across all polls, matching the constant 1 Hz WM 0xC275 cadence — same heartbeat semantics exposed through both the WM path and the pull API. Confirms the polling design is mechanically viable: GetStatistics threading-affinity is fine and the call is cheap. The remaining unknown is whether GetStatistics populates positions[] / handles[] with real entries when an alarm actually fires. Proving that requires triggering an alarm — next probe is an MxAccess write to a $Alarm-extended boolean tag (reference pending). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
9.7 KiB
aaAlarmManagedClient discovery — public surface, 2026-05-01
Result of running
MxGateway.Worker.Tests.AlarmClientDiscoveryTests.DumpAlarmClientPublicSurface
against the deployed AVEVA assembly:
- File:
C:\Program Files (x86)\ArchestrA\Framework\Bin\ViewAppFramework\Content\MA\aaAlarmManagedClient.dll - Assembly identity:
aaAlarmManagedClient, Version=1.0.7368.41290, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7ebd82b507d9e10c
Public types
aaAlarmManagedClient.AlarmClient(class)aaAlarmManagedClient.PriorityData(class)
That's the entire exported surface — two types, no interfaces, no delegates.
AlarmClient events
None. The class has no public events at all. The reflection probe's
GetEvents(BindingFlags.Public | Instance | Static) returned an empty
list.
AlarmClient methods (relevant subset)
- Lifecycle:
RegisterConsumer(int hWnd, string szProductName, string szApplicationName, string szVersion, bool bRetainHiddenAlarms) → int,DeregisterConsumer() → int,InitializeConsumer(string szApplicationName) → int,UninitializeConsumer() → int,Dispose(). - Subscription:
Subscribe(string szSubscription, short wFromPri, short wToPri, eQueryType QueryType, eSortFlags SortFlags, eAlarmFilterState FilterMask, eAlarmFilterState FilterSpecification) → int. - Change enumeration (pull on poke):
GetStatistics(out int lPercentQuery, out int lTotalAlarms, out int lActiveAlarms, out int lSuppressedAlarms, out int lSuppressedFilters, out int lNewAlarms, out int lChangesCount, out int[] ChangeCodes, out int[] ChangePos, out int[] hAlarm) → int. - Record fetch:
GetAlarmExtendedRec(int lIndex, out AlarmRecord almRec) → int,GetAlarmExtendedRec2(...),GetHighPriAlarm(out AlarmRecord almRec) → int. - Selection model (used by ack-selected-* family):
DeselectAll,SelectAlaramEntry(short select, int from, int to),SelectByGUID(Guid),SelectAlarmCount(int from, int to). - Acknowledge:
AlarmAckByGUID(Guid alarmGuid, string ackComment, string ackOprName, string ackOprNode, string ackOprDomain, string ackOprFullName) → intis the per-alarm full-fidelity native ack.AlarmAckSelected(string ackComment, string ackOprName, string ackOprNode, string ackOprDomain, string ackOprFullName) → intacks whatever the selection model currently has selected. SeveralAckSelected*Group/Tag/Priority/All/Visible*Alarms_Ex(...)variants exist for bulk ack scoped to a group / tag / priority range. - Suppress / shelve:
SupressSelected*andShelveSelected*families plusDoAlarmShelveAction(...). Out of scope for the v1 alarm path. - Snapshot/filter (
SF*prefix):SFSetSortA / SFSetFilterA / SFCreateSnapshot / SFGetListCount / SFDeleteSnapshot / SFRefreshAlarm / SFGetStatistics. Snapshot-style query API, distinct from the consumer-subscription path. Not currently used.
What this means
The architecture comment on
src/MxGateway.Worker/MxAccess/AlarmClientConsumer.cs (PR A.5) is
wrong against this deployed assembly:
"The AVEVA alarm-manager surface (
IAlarmMgrDataProvider) exposes the events we need as plain .NET events — no Windows message pump required."
There is no managed event surface. AlarmClient.RegisterConsumer
takes an hWnd because WM_APP messaging is the actual notification
mechanism: AVEVA's alarm provider WM_APP-pokes the registered window,
and the consumer is expected to call GetStatistics on each poke to
pull ChangeCodes / ChangePos / hAlarm arrays, then
GetAlarmExtendedRec(pos, …) per index to fetch each changed record.
AlarmClientConsumer.AlarmRecordReceived has no production callers as
a result — RaiseAlarmRecordReceived is internal for tests and
never gets invoked at runtime. Until A.2 lands a WM_APP pump,
MX_EVENT_FAMILY_ON_ALARM_TRANSITION cannot carry events.
Live runtime probe — 2026-05-01
MxGateway.Worker.Tests.AlarmClientWmProbeTests.ProbeAlarmClientWmMessages
is a Skip-gated runtime probe that creates a real message-only
window, calls AlarmClient.RegisterConsumer(hWnd, …) +
Subscribe(@"\Galaxy!", …), and pumps for 20s while logging every
window message that arrives. Run results below — this turned the
"WM_APP pump" design assumption upside down.
RegisterConsumer and Subscribe both returned 0 (success). The
calls are valid against the deployed assembly; no parameter pinning
needed.
A registered-message-class WM (ID 0xC275 in this OS session)
fired every ~1s after Subscribe completed. Constant
wParam = 0x00001100, constant lParam = 0x079E46D8 (looks like a
stable pointer into AVEVA-internal state) for all 20 hits. The
constant payload across hits with no Galaxy alarm being fired
suggests this is a heartbeat/keepalive, not a per-change
notification.
Critically: this WM is delivered to AVEVA's own internal window
(hwnd=0x18032E) — NOT to the consumer's hWnd we passed in. The
consumer window's WndProc received only the standard creation
sequence (WM_GETMINMAXINFO, WM_NCCREATE, WM_NCCALCSIZE,
WM_CREATE) and the destruction sequence (WM_NCDESTROY,
WM_DESTROY, WM_NCCALCSIZE) — nothing in between. AVEVA's
notification path runs entirely against AVEVA's internal window;
it never forwards to the user-supplied hWnd.
The message ID itself is dynamic (a RegisterWindowMessage
allocation in the >= 0xC000 range), so it cannot be hard-coded —
each consumer process must call RegisterWindowMessage with the
correct string and use whatever ID the OS returns.
What this means for A.2
The "WM_APP pump on the user hWnd" design — what the original plan
banner described and what the previous version of this doc
recommended — does not match how AVEVA actually delivers
notifications. The hWnd parameter to RegisterConsumer does not
appear to receive any of AVEVA's alarm traffic; it's likely used
only as a registration identity (and perhaps as a parent for modal
dialogs).
Two viable A.2 designs given the probe data:
- Polling. Just call
GetStatisticson a timer (e.g. every 500ms in the worker's STA) and react to the change set it reports. No window plumbing needed. Trade-off: latency floor = poll period; modest CPU floor because the call is cheap. Matches the heartbeat-style WM 0xC275 semantics — AVEVA itself runs a poll loop internally. - Hook AVEVA's internal window. Discover AVEVA's own window
(
hwnd=0x18032Ein the probe),SetWindowsHookExorSetWindowSubclasson it, and intercept WM 0xC275 on AVEVA's thread. Higher fidelity, near-zero latency, but invasive, fragile across AVEVA upgrades, and requires running on the same process / thread as the AVEVA window. Probably a non-starter without further AVEVA documentation.
Recommendation: the polling path (option 1) is cheaper to
implement, more robust against AVEVA-internal change, and
acceptable for a typical alarm cadence. The worker's existing STA
already provides a thread-affinitized timer surface. The unanswered
question is whether GetStatistics can be safely called outside
AVEVA's own message-pump thread — confirmable by extending the
probe to fire GetStatistics on its own thread and check the
result.
GetStatistics polling — second probe run, 2026-05-01
Extended the probe to call GetStatistics every ~2s alongside the
WM logger. Key findings:
GetStatisticsis safely callable from the same thread that didRegisterConsumer+Subscribe. Every poll returned rc=0 with no exceptions over 9 polls / 20s window.- The deployed Galaxy currently has zero active alarms. Every
poll reported
total=0 active=0 suppressed=0 newAlarms=0. Thepositions[]andhandles[]arrays were empty. changes=1 codes=[7]was constant across all polls, matching the constant 1 Hz WM 0xC275 cadence. Code 7 is consistent with a "heartbeat / subscription healthy" sentinel — same semantics as the WM but reported through the pull-side API.percent=100(query-complete percentage) was constant — the subscription is steady-state.
This confirms the polling design (option 1 in the previous section)
is mechanically viable. The remaining open question is whether
GetStatistics populates positions[] / handles[] with real
entries when an alarm transition actually fires — proving that
requires firing an alarm.
Open follow-up probes
Each can be added to AlarmClientWmProbeTests as a separate
Skip-gated test:
- Fire a real Galaxy alarm during the pump window. The cleanest
programmatic trigger is an MxAccess write that flips a
$Alarm-extended boolean to true (alarm in) and back to false (alarm out). Pinning the exact tag reference is pending — needs either a documented test-fixture tag or an interactive selection in System Platform IDE. Once the trigger fires, this resolves whether AVEVA's pulled change set arrives viaGetStatisticspositions[] / handles[](per-change polling works) or only via the AVEVA-internal window (callback path needed). - Hook AVEVA's internal window to log what WMs it actually
processes — only relevant if probe 1 shows
GetStatisticsdoes NOT report per-change activity. - Decompile
aaAlarmManagedClient.dll's IL for theRegisterConsumermethod to find whatRegisterWindowMessagestring is used and whether there's a callback-registration surface onWNAL_Registerthat the managed client wraps. The alarmlst.dll strings (WNAL_CallBack, "Invalid callbacks" error) suggest the underlying C API takes callbacks, but the managed wrapper exposes none of them.
PR A.5's Subscribe / AcknowledgeByGuid / SnapshotActiveAlarms
are correct — they're pull-style and don't depend on the
notification mechanism.