Phase 3 PR 29 — Account/session page with roles + capabilities #28

Merged
dohertj2 merged 1 commits from phase-3-pr29-account-page into v2 2026-04-18 14:46:46 -04:00

1 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joseph Doherty
d5fa1f450e Phase 3 PR 29 — Account/session page expanding the minimal sidebar role display into a dedicated /account route. Shows the authenticated operator's identity (username from ClaimTypes.NameIdentifier, display name from ClaimTypes.Name), their Admin roles as badges (from ClaimTypes.Role), the raw LDAP groups that mapped to those roles (from the 'ldap_group' claim added by Login.razor at sign-in), and a capability table listing each Admin capability with its required role and a Yes/No badge showing whether this session has it. Capability list mirrors the Program.cs authorization policies + each page's [Authorize] attribute so operators can self-service check whether their session has access without trial-and-error navigation — capabilities covered: view clusters + fleet status (all roles), edit configuration drafts (ConfigEditor or FleetAdmin per CanEdit policy), publish generations (FleetAdmin per CanPublish policy), manage certificate trust (FleetAdmin per PR 28 Certificates page attribute), manage external-ID reservations (ConfigEditor or FleetAdmin per Reservations page attribute).
Sidebar's 'Signed in as' line now wraps the display name in a link to /account so the existing sidebar-compact view becomes the entry point for the fuller page — keeps the sign-out button where it was for muscle memory, just adds the detail page one click away. Page is gated with [Authorize] (any authenticated admin) rather than a specific role — the capability table deliberately works for every signed-in user so they can see what they DON'T have access to, which helps them file the right ticket with their LDAP admin instead of getting a plain Access Denied when navigating blindly.
Capability → required-role table is defined as a private readonly record list in the page rather than pulled from a service because it's a UI-presentation concern, not runtime policy state — the runtime policy IS Program.cs's AddAuthorizationBuilder + each page's [Authorize] attribute, and this table just mirrors it for operator readability. Comment on the list reminds future-me to extend it when a new policy or [Authorize] page lands. No behavior change if roles are empty, but the page surfaces a hint ('Sign-in would have been blocked, so if you're seeing this, the session claim is likely stale') that nudges the operator toward signing out + back in.
No new tests added — the page is pure display over claims; its only logic is the 'has-capability' Any-overlap check which is exactly what ASP.NET's [Authorize(Roles=...)] does in-framework, and duplicating that in a unit test would test the framework rather than our code. Admin.Tests Unit stays 23 pass / 0 fail. Admin build clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-18 14:43:35 -04:00