Rig: all six docker-dev nodes carry MeshTransport__Mode plus both central
contact points. Mode is "${OTOPCUA_MESH_MODE:-Dps}", so the rig still comes up
on the transport it has always used and the live gate can flip the whole fleet
at `docker compose up` without a compose edit or a rebuild.
Docs: a MeshTransport section in Configuration.md (including why contact points
are addresses only, why the contact set does not scope delivery, and why
buffer-size=0 is a behaviour decision rather than a tuning knob), a "Command
transport" section in Redundancy.md contrasting the two modes, and a summary
beside the Redundancy notes in CLAUDE.md.
Corrects the design doc's claim that ScadaBridge replies with a typed failure to
every unhandled message. Neither of their comm actors has a ReceiveAny or an
Unhandled override; the idiom is per message type and fires on a missing
registration, and an unknown type dead-letters there as it does anywhere else.
Records the exit-gate deviation in the program plan: "an Ask timing out cleanly
against a stopped node" cannot be run, because no Ask crosses this boundary. The
honest equivalents are a stopped node failing the deploy at the apply deadline
and an unreachable contact dropping the command with a Warning.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Two genuinely separate single-member clusters sharing the ActorSystem name and
joined only by ClusterClient, so the mesh boundary is exercised over the wire
rather than through an in-process relay: a relay cannot fail for a missing
receptionist extension, an unregistered service, a malformed contact path or a
serialization break, which are the Phase 2 failure modes.
Covers both legs plus the control:
* central SendToAll -> node comm actor -> node EventStream
* node ApplyAck -> central comm actor, through the node's own client
* a node without the receptionist extension receives nothing
Sabotage-verified. Suppressing the node-side EventStream publish and the
outbound ack Tell reddens one leg each. Restoring the receptionist and the
service registration on the control node reddens the control, which is what
proves the control's send is live rather than silently misaddressed.
The control removes the extension AND the RegisterService call, since resolving
the receptionist to register would materialise the extension whose absence is
the point; it falsifies "delivery happens without a receptionist boundary", not
the extension line alone. Recorded in the test.
Also corrects MeshCommActorPathTests: with one node per side, per-node and
singleton registration are indistinguishable here, so the property the dropped
Task 6 assertion covered belongs to live-gate step 8, not to this class.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 2 Task 7. The five central->node publish sites -- ConfigPublishCoordinator's
deploy dispatch, and AdminOperationsActor's restart, reconnect, acknowledge and
shelve -- now hand a MeshCommand to the transport router instead of telling the
DistributedPubSub mediator directly. Neither actor knows which transport is in
force any more.
_meshRouter is NULLABLE with a mediator fallback, and that is deliberate: about
a dozen existing coordinator and admin-operations tests construct these actors
without a router, and they must keep exercising the real DPS path rather than a
silently-disabled one. The fallback is not a permanent seam -- Phase 6 deletes
it with the DPS branch and the single mesh.
Wiring note: the comm actor's WithActors block moved ABOVE the singleton
registrations so both singletons can resolve it with registry.Get, which is the
ordering-by-registration idiom AdminOperationsActor already uses for the
coordinator. An earlier version used ActorSelection.ResolveOne().GetAwaiter()
.GetResult() inside the props factory -- that blocks inside actor construction
and races the very spawn it waits for.
Sabotage-verified by inverting the branch so the mediator always wins: all six
new tests go red, including the fallback test (which proves it is asserting the
mediator path rather than passing by accident).
Suites after: ControlPlane 118/118, Runtime 450/450, Host.IntegrationTests
196/202 -- sole failure AbCip_Green_AgainstSim, the fixture baseline that fails
on master too.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 2 Task 6. Both comm actors are now spawned and receptionist-registered:
CentralCommunicationActor from WithOtOpcUaControlPlaneSingletons, and
NodeCommunicationActor from WithOtOpcUaRuntimeActors (before DriverHostActor,
because it is the host's ackRouter under ClusterClient mode; it has no
dependency of its own on the host, since inbound commands travel via the node's
EventStream).
Both are plain WithActors registrations, NOT singletons -- a driver node's
ClusterClient rotates across contact points and must find a live comm actor at
whichever node answers. Both register with the receptionist in BOTH transport
modes: an idle registration costs nothing, whereas registering only under
ClusterClient would mean flipping the flag on a running fleet needs a restart
before anything can be reached, turning a config change back into a deployment.
The coordinator ref is resolved lazily per message (Func<IActorRef?> +
registry.TryGet) so the comm actor never depends on the order in which
Akka.Hosting materialises the singleton proxy relative to this block.
Adds MeshCommActorPathTests, which boots the real two-node host and Identify-
probes both paths. These strings are the wire contract and nothing else asserts
they agree: a rename would compile, pass every unit test, deploy, and deliver
nothing, because a ClusterClient send to an unregistered path is dropped
silently. Sabotage-verified with an actual rename.
DELIBERATELY NOT TESTED, with the reason recorded in the file: that the actors
are per-node rather than singletons. Two discriminators were tried and both were
invalid -- "the path resolves on both nodes" passes under either shape because a
ClusterSingletonManager is also created on every node in the role, and "no
/singleton child" is null even for the KNOWN singleton /user/config-publish, so
Akka.Hosting does not lay them out that way. A sabotage re-registering the actor
via WithSingleton left both green, which is what exposed them. Rather than ship
an assertion that cannot fail, the property is left to the Task 8 boundary test,
where a send only arrives if the target really is registered.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 2 Task 5. DriverHostActor and ScriptedAlarmHostActor now subscribe to the
node-local EventStream alongside their existing DPS topic subscriptions, so the
transport flag lives ENTIRELY on the publishing side -- exactly one of the two
ever publishes, and the switch can be flipped or reverted without touching a
single subscriber.
Note the alarm case is not symmetric: the DPS subscribe there still carries the
node-LOCAL publisher (OtOpcUaServerHostedService's OPC UA Part 9 method calls),
which never crosses the boundary and stays on DPS in both modes. Only the
central AdminUI leg moves.
Renamed DriverHostActor._coordinatorOverride to _ackRouter. Under ClusterClient
mode that ref is the NodeCommunicationActor, emphatically not a coordinator,
and the old name would send the next reader looking for one.
Adds two wiring tests, because the unit tests either side of this seam BOTH pass
with the subscription deleted -- the comm actor's test asserts a probe receives
the message, and the host tests drive the actor by direct Tell. Neither notices
a missing PreStart subscribe. Sabotage-verified: deleting either subscription
reddens exactly its own wiring test and nothing else.
Three things went wrong while writing those tests, all worth keeping:
- The first version raced. ActorOf returns before PreStart runs, and an
EventStream.Publish with no subscriber is dropped silently -- no buffering, no
dead letter. Fixed with a warm-up whose ack proves PreStart completed; the
comment says why it is not ceremony.
- The alarm version was VACUOUS: it told the host directly INSIDE the assertion
window alongside the relay, so the direct Tell alone produced the log the
assertion waited for. Split into warm-up (outside) and relay (inside).
- The alarm test needs its own ActorSystem: the shared harness pins
loglevel = WARNING and the only signal an unowned alarm gives is a Debug line.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 2 Task 4. Node-side end of the boundary, registered with the receptionist
per node rather than as a singleton so central's contact rotation reaches
whichever node answers.
Inbound commands are re-emitted on the node's EventStream, NOT back onto their
DistributedPubSub topic. DPS is mesh-wide and central SendToAll-s to every
node's comm actor, so a DPS republish would deliver N copies of every command
to every subscriber. The EventStream is node-local by construction. It also
avoids a registration handshake with actors spawned later: ScriptedAlarmHostActor
is a CHILD of DriverHostActor and has no registry key, so there is no ref to
hand in at wiring time.
Each inbound type is listed explicitly rather than caught by a ReceiveAny, so an
unknown type dead-letters loudly instead of being republished blind onto a
stream where every subscriber ignores it.
Outbound is ApplyAck only, and it uses Send rather than SendToAll -- the deploy
coordinator is one singleton behind central's proxy, so SendToAll would deliver
one ack per central node and the coordinator would count this node twice.
Notably there is NO Ask across this boundary in Phase 2: every migrated command
is fire-and-forget, which is why this actor is far smaller than the sister
project's equivalent and needs no sender preservation at all.
Sabotage-verified twice: deleting the AlarmCommand handler and flipping Send to
SendToAll each redden exactly their own test.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 2 Task 3. Central-side end of the boundary: routes every central->node
command out over DPS or ClusterClient per MeshTransport:Mode, and forwards
inbound ApplyAcks to the deploy coordinator singleton (Forward, not Tell, so
the coordinator sees the node rather than this relay).
Three things here are load-bearing and easy to get wrong later:
SendToAll, never Send. Today's DPS publish reaches EVERY DriverHostActor and
the node side has no ClusterId or node filter to compensate -- scoping happens
later, inside the artifact. ClusterClient.Send delivers to exactly ONE
registered actor, so it would deploy to a single node while every other node
silently kept its old config, and the deployment could still seal green.
Sabotage-verified: swapping to Send reddens exactly that one test.
Exactly ONE ClusterClient, fleet-wide. A receptionist serves its whole cluster,
so SendToAll reaches every registered node-comm actor in the mesh regardless of
which contact point was dialled. One client per application Cluster -- the
shape Phase 6 wants -- would fan each command out once per cluster while the
fleet is still one mesh: N x duplicate DispatchDeployment and ApplyAck. Marked
TODO(Phase 6).
The contact set does NOT scope delivery. Excluding a maintenance-mode node from
the contacts does not stop it receiving commands; it still receives them, as it
does under today's broadcast. The filter is about which receptionists are worth
dialling, not about who gets the message. Stated in the code because the
opposite is the natural assumption.
Also carries the sister project's shipped fixes: per-row address parsing so one
malformed ClusterNode cannot abort the refresh and leave the contact set
half-built (regression test orders the bad row FIRST), the cache entry cleared
before recreate so a failed create cannot leave commands routing into a
stopping actor, and a Status.Failure handler so a DB outage is a Warning rather
than a silent debug-level unhandled message.
Two test-harness bugs found and fixed while writing this, both mine: SubscribeAck
goes to the SENDER (so the mediator subscribe needed an explicit sender), and
EventFilter matches case-INSENSITIVELY, so a "was NOT" filter also caught this
actor's own "was not created" warning.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 2 Task 2. Two small pieces the comm actors are built on.
MeshCommand carries a command plus the DPS topic it would have been published
on, so the admin singletons stop knowing which transport is in force. Without
it the dark switch would have to be threaded through five publish sites across
two actors, each free to drift. Central-side only -- it never crosses the wire,
so it carries no serialization contract.
DefaultMeshClusterClientFactory appends a generation counter to the actor name.
Context.Stop is asynchronous and the name stays reserved until termination
completes, so recreating the same name inside one message handler throws
InvalidActorNameException -- which is exactly what a contact-set change does
(stop the old client, create the replacement, one handler). Ported from the
sister project, where it was a shipped bug fix rather than foresight.
Sabotage-verified: freezing the name to a constant reddens both name tests with
InvalidActorNameException.
Dropped a third test I had written -- it asserted ClusterClientSettings
directly and never touched the factory, so it was coverage theatre. Replaced
with a comment saying where contact propagation IS covered (the Task 8 boundary
test, the only place it can actually fail).
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 2 Task 1. Three changes to the embedded base config, plus a test that
reads every one of them back off a RUNNING ActorSystem rather than off the
HOCON text -- the settled idiom here (SplitBrainResolverActivationTests),
because several fragments compete and the losing one still reads correctly in
the file.
- Registers the ClusterClientReceptionist extension. It is not auto-started, so
without this the boundary only listens if some code path happens to call
ClusterClientReceptionist.Get(system) first: "is the boundary up?" would
depend on startup ordering rather than on configuration.
- buffer-size = 0. This is the one genuine behaviour change and it is NOT what
the sister project runs -- they never wrote this section and inherit 1000.
Buffering would replay a DispatchDeployment on reconnect and apply a
deployment the coordinator already sealed as TimedOut, leaving the node on a
configuration the database says failed.
- log-frame-size-exceeding = 32000b. An oversized frame is dropped WITHOUT
tearing down the association: heartbeats keep flowing, the node reports
healthy, and the only symptom is a command that never arrived. Our deploy
notify is payload-free, so this canary should stay quiet.
reconnect-timeout and receptionist.role restate Akka defaults; they are stated
explicitly and pinned because the behaviour is load-bearing, and the comments
say which is which.
One test was VACUOUS on first write: Config.GetInt returns 0 for a missing key,
so the buffering assertion passed before the feature existed -- it could not
distinguish "explicitly 0" from "absent, default 1000 in force". Rewritten to
assert through ClusterClientSettings/ClusterReceptionistSettings, the objects
the client is actually built from. Sabotage-verified after the fix: setting
buffer-size back to 1000 reddens exactly that one test.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 2 Task 0. Binds a validated `MeshTransport` section selecting which
transport carries central->node commands, defaulting to Dps so nothing changes
until the rig gate passes.
The validator exists because every fault it catches otherwise surfaces as an
ABSENCE -- a deployment that never arrives, an alarm ack that does nothing --
which has no stack trace and no failing node to point at. Two of the shapes it
rejects are ported from the sister project's shipped mistakes: a contact point
carrying an actor-path suffix, and (documented in the options XML) a template
listing the node's OWN remoting port as a central contact, which is a permanent
failure in the initial-contact rotation.
Contact points are required only under ClusterClient mode; requiring them under
the default would make the section mandatory on admin-only nodes that have no
reason to carry them.
Sabotage-verified: relaxing the empty-contacts guard and the actor-path-suffix
guard turns exactly those two tests red, and nothing else.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 2 of the per-cluster mesh program: move the three central->node command
channels (deployments, driver-control, alarm-commands) and the deployment-acks
reply channel off DistributedPubSub onto Akka ClusterClient, behind a config
flag.
Recon of both repos turned up three corrections to the design doc's account of
the sister project, all folded into the plan:
- Design doc S2 claims "every unhandled message replies with a typed failure".
ScadaBridge has no ReceiveAny/Unhandled override in either comm actor; the
typed-failure idiom fires only for a MISSING REGISTRATION, per message type.
- "No central buffering" was never a setting they wrote. They have zero
akka.cluster.client HOCON and run the defaults (buffer-size 1000,
reconnect-timeout off). We choose buffer-size = 0 deliberately.
- Publish -> Send is the wrong substitution. Today's deploy notify is a
broadcast every DriverHostActor receives (no ClusterId filter exists on the
node side), so it must become SendToAll. Send would deploy to exactly one
node of the fleet and seal green on partial acks.
Also records the single-mesh duplicate-delivery trap (one ClusterClient in
Phase 2, not one per Cluster -- a receptionist serves its whole mesh) and one
deviation from the program plan's exit gate: there is no cross-boundary Ask in
Phase 2, because every migrated command is fire-and-forget with a local reply,
so "an Ask timing out cleanly" cannot be run as written.
Marks the program tracking tables current: prereq + Phase 1 are DONE (they
still read "not executed"), Phase 2 in progress.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Closes the last branch-only failures. Measured across five full-suite runs on
this branch versus two on master in a clean worktree: master failed only AbCip
in this assembly (2/2), while the branch additionally failed one or two E2E
deploy tests, rotating between DeployHappyPath, DriverReconnect and
EquipmentNamespaceMaterialization (4/4). Each passed in isolation, and the
assembly on its own was 195/201 throughout — the failures only appeared under
full-suite CPU contention.
Cause is contention, not correctness. Every test here builds a real two-node
Akka cluster — two Kestrel hosts, two ActorSystems with remoting, six admin
singletons, an EF context, a deploy pipeline — and xUnit ran them concurrently
with each other and with every other assembly. That was survivable while the
coordinator sealed instantly on an empty expected-ack set; now that it waits for
a real ack from every configured node, these tests measure an end-to-end
round-trip and starve.
Serialising this one assembly makes them deterministic: 195/201 with only
AbCip_Green_AgainstSim, and the full-solution failure set is now IDENTICAL to
master's — 7 shared, zero branch-only. Cost is wall-clock for this assembly,
40s -> 3m35s; it is a handful of heavyweight E2E tests, not a broad unit suite,
and a widened timeout alone did not fix it (tried first, at 45s).
Also drops createProxyToo for the address reconciler. Nothing resolves
ClusterNodeAddressReconcilerKey from the registry — the actor only reads cluster
state and logs — so the proxy was a second actor per node hunting for a
singleton nobody addresses. Kept because it removes dead machinery, not because
it fixed the flakiness; measured on its own, it did not.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Comparing full-suite runs on this branch against master in a clean worktree:
both fail 11 tests, 9 identical. Master's two extras are load-flaky unit tests
(AbCip Probe_loops, Galaxy EventPumpBoundedChannel); this branch's two extras
were both Host.IntegrationTests deploy-path tests — the area this change
re-times — so they are attributable here rather than to background flakiness.
Cause is margin, not correctness. These waits used to observe a coordinator
that sealed instantly on an empty expected-ack set; they now observe a real
ApplyAck round-trip from every configured node. 15s was enormous margin against
"instant" and thin against the real thing, so they failed only under full-suite
CPU contention.
Hoisted to TwoNodeClusterHarness.DeploySealTimeout (45s) so the reason is
recorded once rather than as four unexplained numbers.
DriverReconnectE2eTests is deliberately left alone: it seeds both ClusterNode
rows itself and unconditionally, so its expected-ack set is identical before and
after this change. Widening its timeout would be papering over a flake this
change did not cause.
Host.IntegrationTests 195/201; sole failure AbCip_Green_AgainstSim, verified
failing on master.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
The full-suite run surfaced two load-dependent failures that were green in
isolation. Root cause: SeedDefaultClusterAsync no-opped unless
OTOPCUA_HARNESS_USE_SQL=1, on the reasoning that "the in-memory provider ignores
FK constraints, so deploy E2E tests pass without it". Phase 1 invalidated that.
With no ClusterNode rows the coordinator's expected-ack set is empty, so it
seals IMMEDIATELY. "Wait for Sealed" therefore stopped implying "every node has
applied" — and because DriverHostActor.UpsertNodeDeploymentState writes each
node's row on its own schedule, every test counting those rows after a seal
became a race. Reproducibly green alone, red under suite load, and it surfaced
in a different test each run, which is what made it look like flakiness rather
than a contract change.
Seeding in both modes restores the invariant those tests were written against
and is closer to production either way: a real fleet always has these rows,
because the FK requires them.
Deployment_started_with_node_b_down_seals_with_one_node_state asserted the
behaviour Phase 1 deliberately removed — its own comment documented membership
snapshotting, i.e. sealing green while a configured node never received the
deployment. Replaced by two tests covering the new contract: a stopped node is
still expected (both state rows exist, B still Applying, deployment does not
seal), and MaintenanceMode is what makes it seal with one.
The new "does not seal" test asserts both rows exist rather than only the
absence of a seal, so it cannot pass against a coordinator that simply died.
Host.IntegrationTests 195/201, sole remaining failure AbCip_Green_AgainstSim —
verified failing on master in a clean worktree, so pre-existing fixture
baseline, not a regression.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 1 gate step 4 failed: setting Enabled = 0 to take a node out of service
returns 422 ClusterEnabledNodeCountMismatch, because
DraftValidator.ValidateClusterTopology requires the enabled-node count to equal
ServerCluster.NodeCount. On a Warm/Hot pair — every cluster on the rig, and
every cluster in the target topology — Enabled can therefore never be the
maintenance hatch. The plan called step 4 "the check that makes step 3
acceptable to ship", so Task 3's behaviour change was not shippable as it stood:
a node down for maintenance would block every deployment to its cluster.
The two rules were each reasonable and contradictory together — the validator
reads Enabled as "part of the declared topology", Phase 1 additionally read it
as "expect an ack". Split the meanings rather than weaken either rule:
Enabled part of the declared topology (validator, untouched)
MaintenanceMode expected to participate now (coordinator + reconciler)
Rejected alternatives: counting configured rather than enabled nodes (drops the
guard against booting a pair into InvalidTopology); downgrading the rule to a
warning (weakens a deploy gate for everyone); shipping with no hatch.
Sabotage: dropping !n.MaintenanceMode from the coordinator query turns the new
test red. It also asserts both nodes remain Enabled, so the fix cannot quietly
regress to disabling the row after all.
Configuration.Tests 95/95, ControlPlane.Tests 101/101, solution builds clean.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
- docker-dev seed: AkkaPort = 4053 on all six ClusterNode rows, so a freshly
seeded rig matches a migrated one. GrpcPort left null.
- config-db-schema.md: both columns, why AkkaPort is NOT NULL/4053 and GrpcPort
is nullable, the unenforced duplication + its reconciler, and Enabled's new
second meaning as the deploy path's expected-ack set.
- Configuration.md: Cluster:Port / PublicHostname now flag that they are stored
twice, with the "update the row too" instruction and why the drift is silent.
- design doc §7: Phase 1 marked done, plus a "Phase 1 as shipped" note recording
both deviations rather than leaving the sketch reading as what happened.
- program plan: Phase 1 marked done; AdminUI node edit explicitly deferred.
- CLAUDE.md: the deploy-path behaviour change and its three consequences.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
ClusterNode.AkkaPort and the node's own Cluster:Port are the same fact in two
places and nothing made them agree. Phase 2 dials the row instead of gossiping,
so a node binding 4054 while its row says 4053 becomes unreachable from central
— and the symptom is a silent absence of acks rather than an error. That is the
shape of the Modbus/ModbusTcp and TwinCat/Focas drifts already in this repo.
Since Phase 1 also made the rows the deploy path's expected-ack set, drift
already costs a failed deployment today.
Implemented as the plan's preferred option: an admin-role singleton comparing
rows against the membership an admin node can already see, rather than each
driver node asserting its own row — Phase 4 removes the driver nodes' ConfigDb
connection, so a self-assertion written there would have to be deleted again.
Three shapes, split by severity: a row whose dial target disagrees with its own
NodeId and a running node with no row are Errors; an enabled row with no
matching member is a Warning, because a node down for maintenance is a
legitimate state. Findings are logged only when the set changes — a check that
reprints the same warning every sweep trains operators to filter it out.
Documented limitation: Phase 2 must revisit this. Once the fleet splits into
one mesh per cluster an admin node cannot see site members, and every site row
would report EnabledRowNotInCluster forever.
Sabotage: removing the change-detection guard turns the repeat test red.
ControlPlane.Tests 100/100.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Cuts ConfigPublishCoordinator's last genuinely mesh-bound dependency: central
must be able to name the nodes a deployment is for without sharing a gossip
ring with them, because Phase 2 splits the fleet into one mesh per Cluster.
Behaviour change, confirmed before implementing: a configured node that is
switched off is now expected, so deploying while it is down fails at the apply
deadline instead of sealing green without it. Under the membership rule the
operator was told the fleet was deployed when it was not. ClusterNode.Enabled
= 0 is the maintenance hatch, and the deadline log now names the silent nodes
and points at that hatch — "4/5 acks landed" would leave an operator reading
logs on five machines.
Two assumptions are now documented on the class rather than left implicit:
every ClusterNode row is a driver node (the DB has no role column and
deliberately does not gain one — it would drift from Cluster:Roles), and
ServerCluster.Enabled is not consulted because nothing else consults it.
Dropped from the plan: cluster-scope filtering of the expected set. There is
no cluster-scoped deployment to filter on — Deployment has no ClusterId,
ConfigComposer always snapshots the whole DB, and ResolveClusterScope is
node-side self-scoping of a fleet-wide artifact.
Positive control: reverting DiscoverDriverNodes to the membership scan turns
three of the four new tests red. The fourth pins the seal-empty branch and is
documented as derivation-insensitive rather than left to look like coverage.
ControlPlane.Tests 90/90.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Additive only — two AddColumn ops, no AlterColumn, so no accumulated model
drift is riding along with this change:
ALTER TABLE [ClusterNode] ADD [AkkaPort] int NOT NULL DEFAULT 4053;
ALTER TABLE [ClusterNode] ADD [GrpcPort] int NULL;
Adds a third test covering the DB-side default specifically. The entity
round-trip cannot see it: ClusterNode.AkkaPort's CLR initializer is also 4053,
so that assertion passes with the mapping default deleted. The new test inserts
through raw SQL with the column omitted, so only the schema can supply the
value — verified by setting defaultValue: 0, which turns exactly that one test
red and leaves the other two green.
Configuration.Tests 95/95.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Per-cluster mesh Phase 1 groundwork. Once the meshes split (Phase 2) central
can no longer see a site node's appsettings, so the transport ports it must
dial have to live in a row central can read.
AkkaPort is non-nullable with a 4053 default — every node listens on a
remoting port, so 0 is never a truthful value and pre-existing rows must
migrate to something real. GrpcPort is nullable with no default: nothing
listens on it until Phase 5, and a non-null default would assert a port that
does not exist.
Both are documented as central's dial targets rather than the node's own
binding config; the duplication against Cluster:Port is reconciled in Task 4.
The new SchemaCompliance test is red until the migration lands (Task 2).
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
docs/Redundancy.md's bootstrap section is rewritten around the mechanism that is
actually in force: which of Akka's two bootstrap processes runs is decided by
whether seed-nodes[0] is this node's own address, so the ORDER of Cluster:SeedNodes
is the fix, not a timer. Adds the per-process table, the shipped self-first
example, why the validator is conditional (site nodes are not seeds) and why it
matches PublicHostname rather than the 0.0.0.0 bind address.
The retirement is documented rather than erased: a new subsection explains that a
watchdog outside the join handshake cannot tell "no seed answered" from "a seed
answered and the join is in flight", and the ea45ace1 live-gate finding is kept
verbatim as the evidence that produced that conclusion (InitJoinAck at 10:49:05,
old incarnation retired 10:49:06, watchdog fired 10:49:15, second cluster). The
watchdog's own earlier PASS is kept too — it did pass what it was gated on.
Also: a live gate for the NEW mechanism is registered as outstanding (not
re-drilled on the docker-dev rig since the swap), and the plan doc that shipped
the watchdog gets a superseded banner rather than an edit, so the execution record
and its Task 8 finding stay readable.
Ripple: CLAUDE.md cluster section, docs/Configuration.md + docs/v2/Cluster.md +
docs/ServiceHosting.md SeedNodes entries, the per-cluster-mesh design doc's two
"CLOSED by SelfFormAfter" notes, and mesh-program Phase 6 (which had this
convergence queued — now marked done early) + Phase 7's live-gate name.
Akka runs FirstSeedNodeProcess -- the only bootstrap path that can form a NEW
cluster when no peer answers InitJoin -- exclusively when seed-nodes[0] is the
node's own address. Every other node runs JoinSeedNodeProcess and retries
InitJoin forever. That is why "both peers are seeds" never meant "either can
cold-start alone", and it is fixed here the way Akka itself intends: each seed
node lists ITSELF first.
- docker-dev central-2 now lists itself as SeedNodes__0 (central-1 was already
self-first). The site nodes are untouched -- they seed off central-1 only and
are deliberately not seeds.
- AkkaClusterOptionsValidator enforces the invariant at boot via the shared
ZB.MOM.WW.Configuration AddValidatedOptions/ValidateOnStart seam. The rule is
CONDITIONAL -- self must be seed[0] only IF self is in the list at all -- or it
would refuse to boot every driver-only site node. Identity is compared on
PublicHostname (falling back to Hostname when blank) AND port, i.e. the address
Akka puts in SelfAddress: matching the 0.0.0.0 bind address would find no seed
anywhere and leave the rule silently inert on the whole docker-dev rig.
- ClusterBootstrapFallback + Cluster:SelfFormAfter are DELETED. The watchdog sat
outside Akka's join handshake, so it could not distinguish "no seed answered"
from "a seed answered and the join is in flight" -- and Cluster.Join(SelfAddress)
is not ignored mid-handshake, it wins. The live gate (ea45ace1) caught it
islanding a node that a manual failover had bounced: InitJoinAck received, no
Welcome inside the window because the peer's ring still held the old
incarnation, watchdog fired, second cluster. The TCP reachability guard patched
that one shape; the race stayed. It was also inert for every non-seed node, so
after this change it can never usefully fire.
- SelfFormBootstrapTests -> SelfFirstSeedBootstrapTests: real in-process clusters
through the production bootstrap at production failure-detection timings, incl.
a falsifiability control proving the OLD peer-first ordering never forms (that
test failed at 11s against the watchdog, which is what proved the retirement),
the restart-into-a-live-peer case that killed the watchdog, and a simultaneous
cold start converging on ONE cluster.
Mirrors ScadaBridge 4a6341d8; anticipates per-cluster-mesh-program Phase 6, which
had this retirement queued.
Corrects the plan's behavior table (the mid-join-handshake row was FALSE) and
notes the mesh-program Phase 6 convergence on ScadaBridge's self-first seed
ordering, which retires the watchdog + guard entirely.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
The live gate for the manual-failover control caught the self-form fallback
forming a SECOND cluster. A node bounced by a failover restarted, received
InitJoinAck from its live peer — the join was in flight and healthy — but did
not get the Welcome inside the 10s window, because the peer's ring still held
the node's previous incarnation (Exiting -> Down -> Removed). The fallback
fired on the timer and the node islanded itself until an operator restarted it.
The original design assumed Cluster.Join(SelfAddress) would be ignored
mid-handshake. It is not — it wins. And since manual failover deliberately
produces that restart, every failover could island the node it bounced.
Before self-forming, TCP-probe the other seed addresses; a reachable peer means
wait another window instead. That is also what the fallback claims to detect:
'no seed answered InitJoin (peer down at boot)'.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Both change how someone should reason about this area, and the second changes a
public message contract, so they belong in CLAUDE.md rather than only in
docs/Redundancy.md. Includes the rule the work established: assert the effective
cluster config off a running ActorSystem, never the typed options or the
akka.conf text, because several HOCON fragments compete and the losing one still
reads correctly in the file.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Four NU1903 high-severity advisories (GHSA-23rf-6693-g89p, GHSA-8q5v-6pqq-x66h,
GHSA-cvvh-rhrc-wg4q, GHSA-g8r8-53c2-pm3f) landed in the NuGet audit data against
System.Security.Cryptography.Xml 10.0.7, which Microsoft.AspNetCore.DataProtection
10.0.7 pulls in transitively for key storage. Under TreatWarningsAsErrors a fresh
restore produces 204 NU1903 errors and the solution does not build at all.
This was invisible locally: machines with cached audit data keep building, so the
break only shows on a clean clone or a docker image build. It surfaced here by
accident — a detached worktree at the pre-change baseline, created to check
whether a flaky test predated today's work, could not restore. Worth noting that
the diagnostic path was the accident, not the intent: nothing in the normal build
or test loop would have reported this before someone else hit it.
Same surgical-pin pattern as the SQLitePCLRaw entry directly above it: a direct
PackageReference at the one project where the chain enters the repo
(Core.Configuration), rather than CentralPackageTransitivePinningEnabled, which
this repo already documents as breaking the Roslyn version split. Bumping the
DataProtection parent to 10.0.10 instead was rejected for the reason the sister
repo recorded when it hit the same advisories: 10.0.10 floors
Microsoft.Extensions.* and, via the EFCore adapter, Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore
at 10.0.10, forcing a family-wide servicing bump and an NU1605 downgrade cascade
that deserves its own reviewed change.
Verified the way the defect demanded — in a fresh worktree, not this one: restore
clean (0 errors, down from 204) and full solution build clean.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
The design doc still described the downing gap and the RoleLeader derivation as
open. Both shipped earlier today, so 6.2 and 4 now carry the fix and its pin
instead of the diagnosis, and 7 marks 0a/0b done. 0a's live gate stays open and
is explicitly deferred to phase 7: the failure only appears in a 1-vs-1 split and
docker-dev is a single six-node mesh, so there is no rig on which to drill it
until the meshes are actually split.
The phase 1 plan lands with one finding that changes its shape. The design pairs
"ClusterNode gains address columns" with "coordinator sources its expected-ack set
from the DB" as though they were one change; they are independent, and the second
is far smaller than it reads. ClusterNode.NodeId is ALREADY in the coordinator's
identifier space — the rig seeds central-1:4053 and so on, because
NodeDeploymentState.NodeId is FK-bound to it and the coordinator's
membership-derived ids already satisfy that FK. That the deploy path works today
is standing proof the two sets agree.
What is not small is the semantics. Membership-derived and DB-derived sets differ
on a configured-but-stopped node: today the deployment seals green without it —
telling the operator the fleet is deployed when it is not — and afterwards it
would fail at the apply deadline. Failing is the better behaviour and is required
once central cannot see cluster membership, but it needs an escape hatch or a node
down for maintenance blocks every deploy. ClusterNode.Enabled already is that
hatch, so the plan filters on it and gates the phase on a live check that proves
both halves: a stopped node fails the deploy legibly, and disabling it lets the
deploy seal.
The plan also adds a task the design does not have: AkkaPort duplicates the node's
own Cluster:Port with nothing making them agree, and an unenforced duplicated
address is the same shape as the Modbus/ModbusTcp and TwinCat/Focas drifts already
recorded here.
Phases 2-7 remain unstarted. They change the running data path and rewrite the
rig, and each needs its own plan and live gate.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Two independent housekeeping defects.
DriverTypeNamesGuardTests (3 failures, pre-existing). The guard discovers each
driver's *DriverFactoryExtensions.Register by reflection and invokes it, then
asserts the registered type-name set matches the DriverTypeNames constants. It
built the argument array positionally — registry first, null for everything after
— on the assumption that the remaining parameters were optional. Galaxy's are
not: its Register takes a REQUIRED ISecretResolver and guards it with
ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull, so the reflective call threw and all three
parity facts failed. OpcUaClient's equivalent parameter is optional, which is why
only Galaxy tripped it.
Worth stating plainly: the guard was not partially broken, it was completely
inert. The throw happened while building the registered set, so NO driver's
parity was ever checked — a genuine drift in any of the nine would have been
invisible behind the same three red tests. Arguments are now supplied by
parameter type, and a parameter the helper cannot satisfy fails with a message
naming the factory and the parameter instead of an opaque ArgumentNullException.
The stand-in resolver reports every secret absent, so if the "factory func is
never invoked" assumption is ever broken, the driver fails closed.
Core.Abstractions.Tests: 138 passed, 0 failed.
MSBuild node reuse. MSBuild leaves worker nodes resident between builds so the
next one starts warm; across this session's repeated solution builds and test
runs that reached 55 idle processes holding ~6 GB. That is not just untidy — the
integration suites assert on timeouts, so memory pressure produces failures
indistinguishable from real regressions, the same failure mode the Workstation-GC
fix addressed from a different direction.
Directory.Build.rsp now passes -nodeReuse:false. Measured on the same incremental
solution build: 15 residual nodes without it, 2 with, and elapsed time 6.12s vs
6.11s — no cost worth the memory on this machine.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
RedundancyStateActor derived the driver Primary from ClusterState.RoleLeader("driver").
Akka offers two different notions of a "first" member and they are not the same
one: role leader is the lowest-ADDRESSED Up member (host, then port), while
ClusterSingletonManager places singletons on the OLDEST — lowest up-number.
They agree on a freshly-formed cluster, which is why every existing test passed.
They diverge after any restart: the restarted node re-joins as the youngest while
keeping its address, so if it holds the lower address it becomes role leader while
the singletons stay put. The snapshot would then name a Primary that is not
hosting the work, and every Primary-gated surface follows it — inbound device
writes, native-alarm acks, the fleet-wide alerts emit, and the alarm-history
drain would all enable on the wrong node while the node actually running the
singletons stayed gated off.
BuildSnapshot now selects the oldest Up member carrying the driver role, matching
singleton placement. Leaving members are excluded: a node handing its singletons
over must not be named Primary.
NodeRedundancyState.IsRoleLeaderForDriver is renamed IsDriverPrimary, and
NodeHealthInputs.IsDriverRoleLeader likewise. Keeping the old names would have
left the wire contract asserting a derivation the code no longer uses — the same
drift that made this defect invisible.
Proven by a real two-node cluster rather than a mock. RedundancyPrimaryElectionTests
binds the first-joining node to the HIGHER port, so oldest and lowest-address name
different nodes, and includes a fixture assertion that the divergence actually
occurred — without it the real assertion could pass for the wrong reason. Positive
control: restoring the RoleLeader derivation turns exactly the two election tests
red while the fixture check stays green.
Runtime.Tests 440 passed, ControlPlane.Tests 82, Cluster.Tests 36.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Ports the sister project's live-proven fix (ScadaBridge cf3bd52f). OtOpcUa ran
the identical configuration it indicts: keep-oldest with down-if-alone = on.
Akka.NET 1.5.62's KeepOldest.OldestDecision only lets the down-if-alone branch
rescue a side holding >= 2 members. A two-node cluster losing a peer is always a
1-vs-1 split, so the branch never fires, the lone survivor falls through to
DownReachable and downs ITSELF, and run-coordinated-shutdown-when-down then
terminates it. down-if-alone is a 3+-node feature and does not do what its name
suggests for a pair: a crash of the oldest node is a total outage, which is the
exact failure the redundancy pair exists to absorb.
Cluster:SplitBrainResolverStrategy now selects the provider, defaulting to
auto-down: Akka's AutoDowning with auto-down-unreachable-after = 15s, so the
leader among the reachable members downs the unreachable peer and a crash of
either node fails over in place. keep-oldest remains available for deployments
that would rather take an outage than ever run dual-active during a real
partition. An unrecognised value fails the host at startup rather than falling
through to the fatal default.
The tests assert the EFFECTIVE configuration — they start a real host through
WithOtOpcUaClusterBootstrap and read akka.cluster.downing-provider-class back off
the running ActorSystem. This is not incidental. The first draft inlined the
three calls the bootstrap makes instead of calling it, which pinned the test's
own wiring: sabotaging production's HOCON precedence left all 36 green. The
prior file had the same shape at a smaller scale, asserting only that
BuildClusterOptions returned a KeepOldestOption — true, and true of a
configuration that cannot fail over. Positive control: making BuildDowningHocon
emit nothing for auto-down turns exactly the two effective-config guards red.
Measured while verifying rather than assumed: HoconAddMode.Append also wins here,
purely because it is added last, so the mode name is not the guarantee. The
comment now says so instead of asserting a precedence rule that does not hold.
Not yet live-drilled on OtOpcUa. The docker-dev rig is a single six-node mesh
where the 1-vs-1 pathology cannot occur; the kill-the-oldest drill belongs with
the per-cluster mesh work that makes every mesh exactly two nodes (design doc
6.2 / Phase 0a). Recorded as an outstanding gate in docs/Redundancy.md.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
I reported this gap as still open, citing a requirements doc line and the PR that
made the failover drill honest about it. Both were stale: ScadaBridge closed it
three hours earlier in cf3bd52f by switching to auto-down. My check missed it
because I compared only one direction (main..origin/main) and never asked whether
local main was AHEAD of origin, so two unpushed commits were invisible to me.
The substance matters more than the correction. Their commit message records a
live-proven finding: Akka.NET 1.5.62 KeepOldest.OldestDecision only lets
down-if-alone rescue a side with >= 2 members, so in a 1-vs-1 split the survivor
takes DownReachable and downs ITSELF. OtOpcUa runs precisely that configuration —
akka.conf active-strategy keep-oldest with down-if-alone on, plus the matching
typed KeepOldestOption — which means a two-node pair cannot fail over when the
oldest node crashes. That is a total-outage defect inside the redundancy feature,
independent of the mesh design, and it is now Phase 0a: most urgent, and needing a
crash-the-oldest live gate because the failure only appears 1-vs-1.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Completes 835fc08c, which fixed the harness's DisposeAsync but left StopNodeBAsync
calling NodeB.DisposeAsync() directly — despite that commit's own message naming
it as carrying the same bug. Caught by re-reading the code rather than trusting
the commit message.
This one is not just about memory. IHost.DisposeAsync never invokes
IHostedService.StopAsync, so CoordinatedShutdown never runs and node B never
performs a graceful Cluster.Leave. Node A instead notices only when the failure
detector times the member out — a slower and materially different path from the
graceful leave the failover tests are written to exercise. The doc comment
asserted the opposite ("shuts down node B via DisposeAsync, which runs
CoordinatedShutdown"); it now says what actually happens and why.
Verified: the three failover suites that call it pass (5/5), and the project is
unchanged at 194 passed with only the AbCip fixture failure, which needs a docker
fixture that is not running.
Also checked the sibling harness while here: LocalDbPairHarness already stops each
host before disposing it, so it needed nothing.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
User-reported: the integration tests leave instances behind and take 18+ GB.
Measured before changing anything — a SINGLE Host.IntegrationTests process peaked
at 30,153 MB RSS across its ~200 tests.
The cause was not a leak and not parallelism. Referencing the Host drags in the
ASP.NET Core framework reference, which turns Server GC on by default: one heap
per core, tuned for throughput and deliberately reluctant to hand memory back.
Correct for a server, wrong for a test host. Workstation GC takes the same suite
from 30,153 MB to 6,717 MB — 78% less — with no change in runtime (45s).
Two hypotheses were measured and rejected on the way, recorded here so nobody
re-runs the experiment: capping xunit maxParallelThreads to 4 cost 29% wall-clock
and saved nothing (30,153 -> 31,115 MB, i.e. noise), and it turns out a single
process was doing all of it. Reverted.
The harness fix is real but was worth only 4% on its own: TwoNodeClusterHarness
disposed each node without stopping it first, and IHost.DisposeAsync only disposes
the service provider — it never invokes IHostedService.StopAsync, which is where
Akka.Hosting terminates the ActorSystem. So every test left two live ActorSystems,
remoting transports and dispatcher pools included, rooted for the process
lifetime. The class doc-comment asserted the opposite ("DisposeAsync, which runs
CoordinatedShutdown"); it was wrong, and StopNodeBAsync inherited the same bug on
a path failover tests depend on.
The payoff is larger than the memory number. Two failures I had classified as
known-flaky baseline noise now pass consistently:
RoslynVirtualTagEvaluatorTests.Evaluate_racing_ClearCompiledScripts_never_fails_with_disposed
and ContinuousHistorizationRecorderTests.Retry_after_writer_failure_eventually_acks.
They were never flaky — they were starved. Full solution: peak summed test-process
RSS 15.2 GB, zero new failures, two fewer.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 2 moves the alarm store-and-forward buffer off its standalone
alarm-historian.db into the consolidated LocalDb as a replicated alarm_sf_events
table, so a node that dies holding undelivered alarm history no longer takes it to
the grave. SqliteStoreAndForwardSink becomes LocalDbStoreAndForwardSink; the
breaking AlarmHistorian:DatabasePath key is removed, surviving only as the path
AlarmSfLegacyMigrator reads to copy a pre-consolidation queue across on first boot.
Because the buffer now replicates, exactly-once delivery could no longer rest on
the enqueue-side gate alone — the Secondary holds a full copy — so the drain gate
had to land in the same commit that registered the table, not as a later
refinement. Delivery is at-least-once across a failover by design; row ids are a
hash of the payload, so an event both nodes accept in a boot window converges to
one row.
The live gate on the docker-dev rig found four production defects, three of which
crash-looped every driver node before its first check could run: an empty
ServerHistorian:ApiKey and a UseTls/scheme mismatch both kill the host (the
validator had classified them as degrading, but the gateway client validates its
own options at construction), and plaintext h2c was unreachable entirely because
the adapter forwarded TLS-only options unconditionally. The fourth was Phase 2's
own: the drain deferred to a cluster-wide elected Primary while the queue is
pair-local, so on a fleet rig every node — including unpaired ones — suspended its
drain and nothing drained anywhere.
Also carries the DoD sweep, which found eight live sites still naming the deleted
sink including user-visible AdminUI text, and the design work that followed: a
per-cluster Akka mesh design mirroring ScadaBridge, and a recorded limitation that
the redundancy election is scoped per Akka cluster rather than per application
Cluster.
Full suite verified twice against a pre-branch baseline worktree: failure sets
identical, zero regressions. The first run showed two extra deploy-test timeouts
that proved to be resource starvation from a leaked test-host process, not a
regression — they pass isolated and did not recur.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Section 5 still listed "site-local-primary storage" among the things deliberately
NOT copied from ScadaBridge — which §6.1 now reverses, since driver nodes stop
connecting to the ConfigDb and read their configuration from LocalDb. Replaced
with an explicit copied/not-copied split, and narrowed the not-copied item to what
it should have said all along: their transient-only central alarm cache, which
OtOpcUa has no reason to adopt because it persists alarm history through the
historian and Phase 2's replicated buffer already survives a failover.
Also corrected a renumbering artefact — the risk about rewriting the docker-dev
rig cited Phase 4, but the mesh partition moved to Phase 6 when the two data-path
phases were inserted.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
(1) One central DB, driver nodes disconnected from it. Verified in ScadaBridge
before adopting: AddConfigurationDatabase is called at Program.cs:264, inside the
Central branch (89-478); the Site branch starts at 479, so site nodes never
register the central database at all. There is still exactly one authoritative
configuration database — it is central-only, and sites fetch from central and
cache locally.
The consequence worth naming: this promotes LocalDb from an outage cache to the
driver node's steady-state configuration store. Boot-from-cache stops being the
exceptional path and becomes the normal one. Phase 1's chunking, SHA-256
verification, retention and pair replication all carry over — but a cache defect
that used to be a degraded-mode bug becomes a total-availability one, so the #485
unreadable-artifact class now has a larger blast radius.
Audited the five driver-side ConfigDb consumers that must be re-homed. Two are
more than mechanical: EfAlarmConditionStateStore holds pair-local Part 9 condition
state and should follow the alarm S&F buffer into LocalDb, and DbHealthProbeActor
feeds ServiceLevel — a driver node with no DB to probe changes what a
client-visible value means.
(2) The keep-oldest gap: corrected the status rather than the conclusion. What was
resolved is the documentation and the drill, not the hole. Gitea PR #12 (closed)
carried T1 badc97af, which made the drill "measure the registered keep-oldest
outage instead of pretending recovery", and T2 d5364506, which dropped "the
undeliverable ~25s active-crash promise". The gap itself is still the registered
deferred keep-oldest topology decision on the 2026-07-08 master tracker, with no
open issue. Accepted here with the same posture, recorded as a known risk.
(3) Auth matches ScadaBridge for now — unauthenticated inter-cluster transports on
a trusted network, recorded as an accepted risk with the fail-closed interceptor
already in our tree noted as the template for whenever it is revisited.
Sequencing grows from six phases to eight; the two that change a running system's
data path rather than its wiring each get their own live gate.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Joseph Doherty