d11d160395f92ae20d204387d5a45eda51bacba1
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Joseph Doherty
|
69e0d02c72 |
task-galaxy-e2e branch — non-FOCAS work-in-progress snapshot
Catch-all commit for pending work on the task-galaxy-e2e branch that
wasn't part of the FOCAS migration. Grouping by topic so future per-topic
commits can be cherry-picked if needed.
TwinCAT
- src/.../Driver.TwinCAT/AdsTwinCATClient.cs + TwinCATDriverFactoryExtensions.cs:
factory-registration extensions + ADS client refinements.
- src/.../Driver.TwinCAT.Cli/Commands/BrowseCommand.cs: new browse command
for the TwinCAT test-client CLI.
- tests/.../Driver.TwinCAT.IntegrationTests/TwinCAT3SmokeTests.cs + TwinCatProject/:
fixture scaffold with a minimal POU + README pointing at the TCBSD/ESXi
VM for e2e.
- docs/Driver.TwinCAT.Cli.md + docs/drivers/TwinCAT-Test-Fixture.md:
documentation for the above.
- docs/v3/twincat-backlog.md: forward-looking backlog seed.
Admin UI + fleet status
- src/.../Admin/Components/Pages/Clusters/DriversTab.razor + Hosts.razor:
UI refresh for fleet-status rendering.
- src/.../Admin/Hubs/FleetStatusHub.cs + FleetStatusPoller.cs +
Admin/Program.cs: SignalR hub + poller plumbing for live fleet data.
- tests/.../Admin.Tests/FleetStatusPollerTests.cs: poller coverage.
Server + redundancy runtime (Phase 6.3 follow-ups)
- src/.../Server/Hosting/RedundancyPublisherHostedService.cs: HostedService
that owns the RedundancyStatePublisher lifecycle + wires peer reachability.
- src/.../Server/Redundancy/ServerRedundancyNodeWriter.cs: OPC UA
variable-node writer binding ServiceLevel + ServerUriArray to the
publisher's events.
- src/.../Server/Program.cs + Server.csproj: hosted-service registration.
- tests/.../Server.Tests/ServerRedundancyNodeWriterTests.cs +
Server.Tests.csproj: coverage for the above.
Configuration
- src/.../Configuration/Validation/DraftValidator.cs +
tests/.../Configuration.Tests/DraftValidatorTests.cs: draft-validation
refinements.
E2E scripts (shared infrastructure)
- scripts/e2e/README.md + _common.ps1 + test-all.ps1: shared helpers + the
all-drivers test-all runner.
- scripts/e2e/test-opcuaclient.ps1: OPC UA Client e2e runner.
Docs
- docs/v2/implementation/phase-6-{1,2,3,4}*.md + exit-gate-phase-{3,7}.md:
phase-gate + implementation doc updates.
- docs/v2/plan.md: top-level plan refresh.
- docs/v2/redundancy-interop-playbook.md: client interop playbook for the
Phase 6.3 redundancy-runtime work.
Two orphan FOCAS docs remain on disk but deliberately unstaged —
docs/v2/focas-deployment.md and docs/v2/implementation/focas-simulator-plan.md
describe the now-retired Tier-C topology and should either be rewritten
or deleted in a follow-up.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
Joseph Doherty
|
99cf1197c5 |
Phase 6.4 exit gate — compliance real-checks + phase doc = SHIPPED (data layer)
scripts/compliance/phase-6-4-compliance.ps1 turns stub TODOs into 11 real checks covering: - Stream A data layer: UnsImpactAnalyzer + DraftRevisionToken + cross-cluster rejection (decision #82) + all three move kinds (LineMove / AreaRename / LineMerge). - Stream B data layer: EquipmentCsvImporter + version marker '# OtOpcUaCsv v1' + decision-#117 required columns + decision-#139 optional columns including DeviceManualUri + duplicate-ZTag rejection + unknown-column rejection. Four [DEFERRED] surfaces tracked explicitly with task IDs: - Stream A UI drag/drop (task #153) - Stream B staging + finalize + UI (task #155) - Stream C DiffViewer refactor (task #156) - Stream D OPC 40010 Identification sub-folder + Razor component (task #157) Cross-cutting: full solution dotnet test passes 1159 >= 1137 pre-Phase-6.4 baseline; pre-existing Client.CLI Subscribe flake tolerated. docs/v2/implementation/phase-6-4-admin-ui-completion.md status updated from DRAFT to SHIPPED (data layer). Four Blazor / SignalR / EF / address-space follow-ups tracked as tasks — the visual-compliance review pattern from Phase 6.1 Stream E applies to each. `Phase 6.4 compliance: PASS` — exit 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
Joseph Doherty
|
ba31f200f6 |
Phase 6 reconcile — merge adjustments into plan bodies, add decisions #143-162, scaffold compliance stubs
After shipping the four Phase 6 plan drafts (PRs 77-80), the adversarial-review
adjustments lived only as trailing "Review" sections. An implementer reading
Stream A would find the original unadjusted guidance, then have to cross-reference
the review to reconcile. This PR makes the plans genuinely executable:
1. Merges every ACCEPTed review finding into the actual Scope / Stream / Compliance
sections of each phase plan:
- phase-6-1: Scope table rewrite (per-capability retry, (instance,host) pipeline key,
MemoryTracking vs MemoryRecycle split, hybrid watchdog formula, demand-aware
wedge detector, generation-sealed LiteDB). Streams A/B/D + Compliance rewritten.
- phase-6-2: AuthorizationDecision tri-state, control/data-plane separation,
MembershipFreshnessInterval (15 min), AuthCacheMaxStaleness (5 min),
subscription stamp-and-reevaluate. Stream C widened to 11 OPC UA operations.
- phase-6-3: 8-state ServiceLevel matrix (OPC UA Part 5 §6.3.34-compliant),
two-layer peer probe (/healthz + UaHealthProbe), apply-lease via await using,
publish-generation fencing, InvalidTopology runtime state, ServerUriArray
self-first + peers. New Stream F (interop matrix + Galaxy failover).
- phase-6-4: DraftRevisionToken concurrency control, staged-import via
EquipmentImportBatch with user-scoped visibility, CSV header version marker,
decision-#117-aligned identifier columns, 1000-row diff cap,
decision-#139 OPC 40010 fields, Identification inherits Equipment ACL.
2. Appends decisions #143 through #162 to docs/v2/plan.md capturing the
architectural commitments the adjustments created. Each decision carries its
dated rationale so future readers know why the choice was made.
3. Scaffolds scripts/compliance/phase-6-{1,2,3,4}-compliance.ps1 — PowerShell
stubs with Assert-Todo / Assert-Pass / Assert-Fail helpers. Every check
maps to a Stream task ID from the corresponding phase plan. Currently all
checks are TODO and scripts exit 0; each implementation task is responsible
for replacing its TODO with a real check before closing that task. Saved
as UTF-8 with BOM so Windows PowerShell 5.1 parses em-dash characters
without breaking.
Net result: the Phase 6.1 plan is genuinely ready to execute. Stream A.3 can
start tomorrow without reconciling Streams vs. Review on every task; the
compliance script is wired to the Stream IDs; plan.md has the architectural
commitments that justify the Stream choices.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
Joseph Doherty
|
4695a5c88e | Phase 6 — Draft 4 implementation plans covering v2 unimplemented features + adversarial review + adjustments. After drivers were paused per user direction, audited the v2 plan for features documented-but-unshipped and identified four coherent tracks that had no implementation plan at all. Each plan follows the docs/v2/implementation/phase-*.md template (DRAFT status, branch name, Stream A-E task breakdown, Compliance Checks, Risks, Completion Checklist). docs/v2/implementation/phase-6-1-resilience-and-observability.md (243 lines) covers Polly resilience pipelines wired to every capability interface, Tier A/B/C runtime enforcement (memory watchdog generalized beyond Galaxy, scheduled recycle per decision #67, wedge detection), health endpoints on :4841, structured Serilog with correlation IDs, LiteDB local-cache fallback per decision #36. phase-6-2-authorization-runtime.md (145 lines) wires ACL enforcement on every OPC UA Read/Write/Subscribe/Call path + LDAP-group-to-admin-role grants per decisions #105 and #129 -- runtime permission-trie evaluator over the 6-level Cluster/Namespace/UnsArea/UnsLine/Equipment/Tag hierarchy, per-session cache invalidated on generation-apply + LDAP-cache expiry. phase-6-3-redundancy-runtime.md (165 lines) lands the non-transparent warm/hot redundancy runtime per decisions #79-85: dynamic ServiceLevel node, ServerUriArray peer broadcast, mid-apply dip via sp_PublishGeneration hook, operator-driven role transition (no auto-election -- plan remains explicit about what's out of scope). phase-6-4-admin-ui-completion.md (178 lines) closes Phase 1 Stream E completion-checklist items that never landed: UNS drag-reorder + impact preview, Equipment CSV import, 5-identifier search, draft-diff viewer enhancements, OPC 40010 _base Identification field exposure per decisions #138-139. Each plan then got a Codex adversarial-review pass (codex mcp tool, read-only sandbox, synchronous). Reviews explicitly targeted decision-log conflicts, API-shape assumptions, unbounded blast radius, under-specified state transitions, and testing holes. Appended 'Adversarial Review — 2026-04-19' section to each plan with numbered findings (severity / finding / why-it-matters / adjustment accepted). Review surfaced real substantive issues that the initial drafts glossed over: Phase 6.1 auto-retry conflicting with decisions #44-45 no-auto-write-retry rule; Phase 6.1 per-driver-instance pipeline breaking decision #35's per-device isolation; Phase 6.1 recycle/watchdog at Tier A/B breaching decisions #73-74 Tier-C-only constraint; Phase 6.2 conflating control-plane LdapGroupRoleMapping with data-plane ACL grants; Phase 6.2 missing Browse enforcement entirely; Phase 6.2 subscription re-authorization policy unresolved between create-time-only and per-publish; Phase 6.3 ServiceLevel=0 colliding with OPC UA Part 5 Maintenance semantics; Phase 6.3 ServerUriArray excluding self (spec-bug); Phase 6.3 apply-window counter race on cancellation; Phase 6.3 client cutover for Kepware/Aveva OI Gateway is unverified hearsay; Phase 6.4 stale UNS impact preview overwriting concurrent draft edits; Phase 6.4 identifier contract drifting from admin-ui.md canonical set (ZTag/MachineCode/SAPID/EquipmentId/EquipmentUuid, not ZTag/SAPID/UniqueId/Alias1/Alias2); Phase 6.4 CSV import atomicity internally contradictory (single txn vs chunked inserts); Phase 6.4 OPC 40010 field list not matching decision #139. Every finding has an adjustment in the plan doc -- plans are meant to be executable from the next session with the critique already baked in rather than a clean draft that would run into the same issues at implementation time. Codex thread IDs cited in each plan's review section for reproducibility. Pure documentation PR -- no code changes. Plans are DRAFT status; each becomes its own implementation phase with its own entry-gate + exit-gate when business prioritizes. |