Phase 6.1 Stream E.2 partial - ResilienceStatusPublisherHostedService #105

Merged
dohertj2 merged 1 commits from phase-6-1-resilience-status-publisher into v2 2026-04-19 14:37:54 -04:00
Owner

Closes the HostedService half of Phase 6.1 Stream E.2. Admin UI /hosts column refresh + SignalR push + red-badge visual (E.3) remain in the visual-compliance pass.

Summary

  • ResilienceStatusPublisherHostedService : BackgroundService. 5 s tick; samples DriverResilienceStatusTracker + upserts into DriverInstanceResilienceStatus. Best-effort (DB outage logs + retries next tick; never crashes).
  • PersistOnceAsync public for deterministic tests.
  • CurrentBulkheadDepth currently persisted as 0 pending a narrower follow-up that wires Polly bulkhead-depth observer into the tracker.

Test plan

  • 6 new tests: empty tick is no-op; new row upsert with counters; second tick updates in place; multi-host independence; footprint round-trip; tick counter advances.
  • Full solution dotnet test: 1225 passing (was 1219, +6).

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Closes the HostedService half of Phase 6.1 Stream E.2. Admin UI /hosts column refresh + SignalR push + red-badge visual (E.3) remain in the visual-compliance pass. ## Summary - `ResilienceStatusPublisherHostedService : BackgroundService`. 5 s tick; samples `DriverResilienceStatusTracker` + upserts into `DriverInstanceResilienceStatus`. Best-effort (DB outage logs + retries next tick; never crashes). - `PersistOnceAsync` public for deterministic tests. - `CurrentBulkheadDepth` currently persisted as 0 pending a narrower follow-up that wires Polly bulkhead-depth observer into the tracker. ## Test plan - [x] 6 new tests: empty tick is no-op; new row upsert with counters; second tick updates in place; multi-host independence; footprint round-trip; tick counter advances. - [x] Full solution `dotnet test`: 1225 passing (was 1219, +6). 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
dohertj2 added 1 commit 2026-04-19 14:37:45 -04:00
Closes the HostedService half of Phase 6.1 Stream E.2 flagged as a follow-up
when the DriverResilienceStatusTracker shipped in PR #82. The Admin /hosts
column refresh + SignalR push + red-badge visual (Stream E.3) remain
deferred to the visual-compliance pass — this PR owns the persistence
story alone.

Server.Hosting:
- ResilienceStatusPublisherHostedService : BackgroundService. Samples the
  DriverResilienceStatusTracker every TickInterval (default 5 s) and upserts
  each (DriverInstanceId, HostName) counter pair into
  DriverInstanceResilienceStatus via EF. New rows on first sight; in-place
  updates on subsequent ticks.
- PersistOnceAsync extracted public so tests drive one tick directly —
  matches the ScheduledRecycleHostedService pattern for deterministic
  timing.
- Best-effort persistence: a DB outage logs a warning + continues; the next
  tick retries. Never crashes the app on sample failure. Cancellation
  propagates through cleanly.
- Tracks the bulkhead depth / recycle / footprint columns the entity was
  designed for. CurrentBulkheadDepth currently persisted as 0 — the tracker
  doesn't yet expose live bulkhead depth; a narrower follow-up wires the
  Polly bulkhead-depth observer into the tracker.

Tests (6 new in ResilienceStatusPublisherHostedServiceTests):
- Empty tracker → tick is a no-op, zero rows written.
- Single-host counters → upsert a new row with ConsecutiveFailures + breaker
  timestamp + sampled timestamp.
- Second tick updates the existing row in place (not a second insert).
- Multi-host pairs persist independently.
- Footprint counters (Baseline + Current) round-trip.
- TickCount advances on every PersistOnceAsync call.

Full solution dotnet test: 1225 passing (was 1219, +6). Pre-existing
Client.CLI Subscribe flake unchanged.

Production wiring (Program.cs) example:
  builder.Services.AddSingleton<DriverResilienceStatusTracker>();
  builder.Services.AddHostedService<ResilienceStatusPublisherHostedService>();
  // Tracker gets wired into CapabilityInvoker via OtOpcUaServer resolution
  // + the existing Phase 6.1 layer.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
dohertj2 merged commit 98b69ff4f9 into v2 2026-04-19 14:37:54 -04:00
dohertj2 referenced this issue from a commit 2026-04-30 08:21:25 -04:00
Phase 6 — Draft 4 implementation plans covering v2 unimplemented features + adversarial review + adjustments. After drivers were paused per user direction, audited the v2 plan for features documented-but-unshipped and identified four coherent tracks that had no implementation plan at all. Each plan follows the docs/v2/implementation/phase-*.md template (DRAFT status, branch name, Stream A-E task breakdown, Compliance Checks, Risks, Completion Checklist). docs/v2/implementation/phase-6-1-resilience-and-observability.md (243 lines) covers Polly resilience pipelines wired to every capability interface, Tier A/B/C runtime enforcement (memory watchdog generalized beyond Galaxy, scheduled recycle per decision #67, wedge detection), health endpoints on :4841, structured Serilog with correlation IDs, LiteDB local-cache fallback per decision #36. phase-6-2-authorization-runtime.md (145 lines) wires ACL enforcement on every OPC UA Read/Write/Subscribe/Call path + LDAP-group-to-admin-role grants per decisions #105 and #129 -- runtime permission-trie evaluator over the 6-level Cluster/Namespace/UnsArea/UnsLine/Equipment/Tag hierarchy, per-session cache invalidated on generation-apply + LDAP-cache expiry. phase-6-3-redundancy-runtime.md (165 lines) lands the non-transparent warm/hot redundancy runtime per decisions #79-85: dynamic ServiceLevel node, ServerUriArray peer broadcast, mid-apply dip via sp_PublishGeneration hook, operator-driven role transition (no auto-election -- plan remains explicit about what's out of scope). phase-6-4-admin-ui-completion.md (178 lines) closes Phase 1 Stream E completion-checklist items that never landed: UNS drag-reorder + impact preview, Equipment CSV import, 5-identifier search, draft-diff viewer enhancements, OPC 40010 _base Identification field exposure per decisions #138-139. Each plan then got a Codex adversarial-review pass (codex mcp tool, read-only sandbox, synchronous). Reviews explicitly targeted decision-log conflicts, API-shape assumptions, unbounded blast radius, under-specified state transitions, and testing holes. Appended 'Adversarial Review — 2026-04-19' section to each plan with numbered findings (severity / finding / why-it-matters / adjustment accepted). Review surfaced real substantive issues that the initial drafts glossed over: Phase 6.1 auto-retry conflicting with decisions #44-45 no-auto-write-retry rule; Phase 6.1 per-driver-instance pipeline breaking decision #35's per-device isolation; Phase 6.1 recycle/watchdog at Tier A/B breaching decisions #73-74 Tier-C-only constraint; Phase 6.2 conflating control-plane LdapGroupRoleMapping with data-plane ACL grants; Phase 6.2 missing Browse enforcement entirely; Phase 6.2 subscription re-authorization policy unresolved between create-time-only and per-publish; Phase 6.3 ServiceLevel=0 colliding with OPC UA Part 5 Maintenance semantics; Phase 6.3 ServerUriArray excluding self (spec-bug); Phase 6.3 apply-window counter race on cancellation; Phase 6.3 client cutover for Kepware/Aveva OI Gateway is unverified hearsay; Phase 6.4 stale UNS impact preview overwriting concurrent draft edits; Phase 6.4 identifier contract drifting from admin-ui.md canonical set (ZTag/MachineCode/SAPID/EquipmentId/EquipmentUuid, not ZTag/SAPID/UniqueId/Alias1/Alias2); Phase 6.4 CSV import atomicity internally contradictory (single txn vs chunked inserts); Phase 6.4 OPC 40010 field list not matching decision #139. Every finding has an adjustment in the plan doc -- plans are meant to be executable from the next session with the critique already baked in rather than a clean draft that would run into the same issues at implementation time. Codex thread IDs cited in each plan's review section for reproducibility. Pure documentation PR -- no code changes. Plans are DRAFT status; each becomes its own implementation phase with its own entry-gate + exit-gate when business prioritizes.
Sign in to join this conversation.