Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joseph Doherty
2fe4bac508 Phase 6.3 exit gate — compliance real-checks + phase doc = SHIPPED (core)
scripts/compliance/phase-6-3-compliance.ps1 turns stub TODOs into 21 real
checks covering:
- Stream B 8-state matrix: ServiceLevelCalculator + ServiceLevelBand present;
  Maintenance=0, NoData=1, InvalidTopology=2, AuthoritativePrimary=255,
  IsolatedPrimary=230, PrimaryMidApply=200, RecoveringPrimary=180,
  AuthoritativeBackup=100, IsolatedBackup=80, BackupMidApply=50,
  RecoveringBackup=30 — every numeric band pattern-matched in source (any
  drift turns a check red).
- Stream B RecoveryStateManager with dwell + publish-witness gate + 60s
  default dwell.
- Stream D ApplyLeaseRegistry: BeginApplyLease returns IAsyncDisposable;
  key includes PublishRequestId (decision #162); PruneStale watchdog present;
  10 min default ApplyMaxDuration.

Five [DEFERRED] follow-up surfaces explicitly listed with task IDs:
  - Stream A topology loader (task #145)
  - Stream C OPC UA node wiring (task #147)
  - Stream E Admin UI (task #149)
  - Stream F interop + Galaxy failover (task #150)
  - sp_PublishGeneration Transparent-mode rejection (task #148 part 2)

Cross-cutting: full solution dotnet test passes 1137 >= 1097 pre-Phase-6.3
baseline; pre-existing Client.CLI Subscribe flake tolerated.

docs/v2/implementation/phase-6-3-redundancy-runtime.md status updated from
DRAFT to SHIPPED (core). Non-transparent redundancy per decision #84 keeps
role election out of scope — operator-driven failover is the v2.0 model.

`Phase 6.3 compliance: PASS` — exit 0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-19 10:00:30 -04:00
Joseph Doherty
ba31f200f6 Phase 6 reconcile — merge adjustments into plan bodies, add decisions #143-162, scaffold compliance stubs
After shipping the four Phase 6 plan drafts (PRs 77-80), the adversarial-review
adjustments lived only as trailing "Review" sections. An implementer reading
Stream A would find the original unadjusted guidance, then have to cross-reference
the review to reconcile. This PR makes the plans genuinely executable:

1. Merges every ACCEPTed review finding into the actual Scope / Stream / Compliance
   sections of each phase plan:
   - phase-6-1: Scope table rewrite (per-capability retry, (instance,host) pipeline key,
     MemoryTracking vs MemoryRecycle split, hybrid watchdog formula, demand-aware
     wedge detector, generation-sealed LiteDB). Streams A/B/D + Compliance rewritten.
   - phase-6-2: AuthorizationDecision tri-state, control/data-plane separation,
     MembershipFreshnessInterval (15 min), AuthCacheMaxStaleness (5 min),
     subscription stamp-and-reevaluate. Stream C widened to 11 OPC UA operations.
   - phase-6-3: 8-state ServiceLevel matrix (OPC UA Part 5 §6.3.34-compliant),
     two-layer peer probe (/healthz + UaHealthProbe), apply-lease via await using,
     publish-generation fencing, InvalidTopology runtime state, ServerUriArray
     self-first + peers. New Stream F (interop matrix + Galaxy failover).
   - phase-6-4: DraftRevisionToken concurrency control, staged-import via
     EquipmentImportBatch with user-scoped visibility, CSV header version marker,
     decision-#117-aligned identifier columns, 1000-row diff cap,
     decision-#139 OPC 40010 fields, Identification inherits Equipment ACL.

2. Appends decisions #143 through #162 to docs/v2/plan.md capturing the
   architectural commitments the adjustments created. Each decision carries its
   dated rationale so future readers know why the choice was made.

3. Scaffolds scripts/compliance/phase-6-{1,2,3,4}-compliance.ps1 — PowerShell
   stubs with Assert-Todo / Assert-Pass / Assert-Fail helpers. Every check
   maps to a Stream task ID from the corresponding phase plan. Currently all
   checks are TODO and scripts exit 0; each implementation task is responsible
   for replacing its TODO with a real check before closing that task. Saved
   as UTF-8 with BOM so Windows PowerShell 5.1 parses em-dash characters
   without breaking.

Net result: the Phase 6.1 plan is genuinely ready to execute. Stream A.3 can
start tomorrow without reconciling Streams vs. Review on every task; the
compliance script is wired to the Stream IDs; plan.md has the architectural
commitments that justify the Stream choices.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-19 03:49:41 -04:00
Joseph Doherty
4695a5c88e Phase 6 — Draft 4 implementation plans covering v2 unimplemented features + adversarial review + adjustments. After drivers were paused per user direction, audited the v2 plan for features documented-but-unshipped and identified four coherent tracks that had no implementation plan at all. Each plan follows the docs/v2/implementation/phase-*.md template (DRAFT status, branch name, Stream A-E task breakdown, Compliance Checks, Risks, Completion Checklist). docs/v2/implementation/phase-6-1-resilience-and-observability.md (243 lines) covers Polly resilience pipelines wired to every capability interface, Tier A/B/C runtime enforcement (memory watchdog generalized beyond Galaxy, scheduled recycle per decision #67, wedge detection), health endpoints on :4841, structured Serilog with correlation IDs, LiteDB local-cache fallback per decision #36. phase-6-2-authorization-runtime.md (145 lines) wires ACL enforcement on every OPC UA Read/Write/Subscribe/Call path + LDAP-group-to-admin-role grants per decisions #105 and #129 -- runtime permission-trie evaluator over the 6-level Cluster/Namespace/UnsArea/UnsLine/Equipment/Tag hierarchy, per-session cache invalidated on generation-apply + LDAP-cache expiry. phase-6-3-redundancy-runtime.md (165 lines) lands the non-transparent warm/hot redundancy runtime per decisions #79-85: dynamic ServiceLevel node, ServerUriArray peer broadcast, mid-apply dip via sp_PublishGeneration hook, operator-driven role transition (no auto-election -- plan remains explicit about what's out of scope). phase-6-4-admin-ui-completion.md (178 lines) closes Phase 1 Stream E completion-checklist items that never landed: UNS drag-reorder + impact preview, Equipment CSV import, 5-identifier search, draft-diff viewer enhancements, OPC 40010 _base Identification field exposure per decisions #138-139. Each plan then got a Codex adversarial-review pass (codex mcp tool, read-only sandbox, synchronous). Reviews explicitly targeted decision-log conflicts, API-shape assumptions, unbounded blast radius, under-specified state transitions, and testing holes. Appended 'Adversarial Review — 2026-04-19' section to each plan with numbered findings (severity / finding / why-it-matters / adjustment accepted). Review surfaced real substantive issues that the initial drafts glossed over: Phase 6.1 auto-retry conflicting with decisions #44-45 no-auto-write-retry rule; Phase 6.1 per-driver-instance pipeline breaking decision #35's per-device isolation; Phase 6.1 recycle/watchdog at Tier A/B breaching decisions #73-74 Tier-C-only constraint; Phase 6.2 conflating control-plane LdapGroupRoleMapping with data-plane ACL grants; Phase 6.2 missing Browse enforcement entirely; Phase 6.2 subscription re-authorization policy unresolved between create-time-only and per-publish; Phase 6.3 ServiceLevel=0 colliding with OPC UA Part 5 Maintenance semantics; Phase 6.3 ServerUriArray excluding self (spec-bug); Phase 6.3 apply-window counter race on cancellation; Phase 6.3 client cutover for Kepware/Aveva OI Gateway is unverified hearsay; Phase 6.4 stale UNS impact preview overwriting concurrent draft edits; Phase 6.4 identifier contract drifting from admin-ui.md canonical set (ZTag/MachineCode/SAPID/EquipmentId/EquipmentUuid, not ZTag/SAPID/UniqueId/Alias1/Alias2); Phase 6.4 CSV import atomicity internally contradictory (single txn vs chunked inserts); Phase 6.4 OPC 40010 field list not matching decision #139. Every finding has an adjustment in the plan doc -- plans are meant to be executable from the next session with the critique already baked in rather than a clean draft that would run into the same issues at implementation time. Codex thread IDs cited in each plan's review section for reproducibility. Pure documentation PR -- no code changes. Plans are DRAFT status; each becomes its own implementation phase with its own entry-gate + exit-gate when business prioritizes. 2026-04-19 03:15:00 -04:00