dohertj2/3yearplan
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update status.md for session handoff to CC 4.7

Browse Source 
Session bookmark updated: captures all work done 2026-04-15 through
2026-04-23, removes stale session ID (new session will self-orient from
CLAUDE.md + status.md), updates resume flow for a fresh start.
This commit is contained in:
Joseph Doherty
2026-04-23 12:29:24 -04:00
parent 7d44802517
commit c8d7bf37de
1 changed files with 21 additions and 11 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

32
STATUS.md
View File

@@ -1,14 +1,24 @@
# Plan — Working Session Status
**Saved:** 2026-04-15
**Claude Code session ID:** `4851af09-c6b2-41fd-a419-a43d8cf80721`
**Resume with:** `claude --resume 4851af09-c6b2-41fd-a419-a43d8cf80721` (or pick from `/resume` inside Claude Code)
**Saved:** 2026-04-23
**Previous session:** Opus 4.6 (1M context)
**Resume with:** start a new Claude Code session in this directory — `CLAUDE.md` and this file provide full context. No session ID needed; the plan is self-contained in the repo.
> This file is a **bookmark**, not a replacement for the plan. The authoritative content lives in `CLAUDE.md`, `current-state.md`, `goal-state.md`, `roadmap.md`, and the component detail files under `current-state/`, `goal-state/`, and `outputs/`. Read this file only to find out where we left off.
## Where we are
The plan is substantively fleshed out. All three core documents are populated, the canonical model + UNS framing has been declared, the digital twin management conversation has happened and been absorbed, and most open items are either design-time details the build team can close or items deliberately marked out of scope. An output generation pipeline (PPTX + PDF) has been scaffolded with spec files but no outputs generated yet.
The plan is **substantially complete**. All core documents are populated, architectural decisions are captured with rationale, the canonical model + UNS hierarchy standard are declared, the digital twin use cases are absorbed, the OtOpcUa v2 implementation corrections (19 items + addendum) are integrated, and the first PPTX has been generated. The `schemas/` repo seed exists with the FANUC CNC pilot class and JSON Schema format definitions.
**What happened since the original session (2026-04-15 through 2026-04-23):**
- Integrated OtOpcUa v2 implementation corrections (19 corrections + hardening addendum: ACL model committed, stability tiers, multi-identifier equipment model, driver list confirmed, cutover ownership assigned outside OtOpcUa)
- Schemas repo seed contributed by OtOpcUa team at `schemas/` (temporary location)
- Enterprise shortname resolved to `zb`; Warsaw West buildings confirmed as 5 and 19
- Equipment protocol survey removed (driver list confirmed directly by v2 team)
- First PPTX generated (18 slides, mixed-stakeholder deck)
- 7 component diagrams created (OtOpcUa, Redpanda, SnowBridge, ScadaBridge dataflow + topology, Snowflake/dbt)
- ScadaBridge accuracy corrections from design repo review (email only, not Teams; EventHub not yet implemented)
- ScadaBridge topology corrected (no site-to-site routing; direct API access; inbound Web API as input)
### Files
@@ -100,14 +110,14 @@ Items that can wait, design details that close during implementation, and delibe
## Recommended resume flow
1. Resume the Claude Code session (`claude --resume 4851af09-c6b2-41fd-a419-a43d8cf80721`).
2. Skim this file and `CLAUDE.md` to re-orient (~2 minutes).
3. Pick one of the three external-dependency items above — or whatever has become most pressing — and tell me which.
4. If you've already had the Power BI coordination conversation with the reporting team, bring the answers and I'll fold them into the plan.
1. Start a new Claude Code session in this directory. `CLAUDE.md` and this file provide full context.
2. Skim this file to re-orient (~2 minutes).
3. Pick one of the three external-dependency items above — or whatever has become most pressing.
4. If you've had the Power BI coordination conversation with the reporting team, bring the answers and I'll fold them into the plan.
5. If a funded simulation initiative has materialized (digital twin use case 2), say so and I'll reuse the meeting brief for a scoping conversation.
6. If the equipment protocol survey walk has been run, bring the data and I'll populate both `current-state/equipment-protocol-survey.md` and the initial UNS hierarchy snapshot in one pass.
7. If the enterprise shortname has been assigned (currently `ent` placeholder in `goal-state.md`), tell me and I'll propagate the find-and-replace across the UNS hierarchy examples.
8. When ready to generate outputs (deck + PDF), say `regenerate outputs`, `regenerate presentation`, or `regenerate longform` and I'll follow the checklist in `outputs/README.md`.
6. If the UNS hierarchy walk has been run, bring the data and I'll populate the initial hierarchy snapshot in the `schemas` repo.
7. To regenerate outputs: `regenerate presentation` (PPTX), `regenerate longform` (PDF, not yet run), or `regenerate outputs` (both). See `outputs/README.md` for the full checklist.
8. To hand off a component to an implementation agent, check `handoffs/` for existing handoff docs or ask me to create one.
## What not to do on resume