Joseph Doherty
fd180e576f
Adds the family backlog standard to the root index (open work = Gitea issues, shared label set, BTDB excluded) and converts components/*/GAPS, hosted-lib CLAUDE.md notes, code-reviews, infra/glauth and plan docs to banner + issue pointers (scadaproj #5-#19, ScadaBridge#79).
Code Reviews
Comprehensive, per-library code reviews of the ZB.MOM.WW.* shared libraries hosted
in this repo. Each library (one self-contained .slnx at the repo root) has its own
folder containing a findings.md. This README is the aggregated index — the single
place to see all outstanding work.
Generated by
regen-readme.pyfrom the per-libraryfindings.mdfiles. Do not edit by hand — edit the findings files and re-run the script.
Status lives in Gitea. Open items from this file are tracked as issues on gitea.dohertylan.com/dohertj2/scadaproj (label
migrated, 2026-11-06). This file is a historical/design record — do not track status here; file new work (including new review findings) as an issue.
How it works
- Reviews are performed one library at a time against a fixed checklist.
- Each library is reviewed against its normalized component spec under
components/. - Every finding is recorded in the library's
findings.mdwith a severity and status. - Findings are never deleted — they are closed by changing their status, keeping a full audit trail.
- This README aggregates every pending finding (
Open/In Progress) across all libraries.
See REVIEW-PROCESS.md for the full procedure: the review checklist, severity definitions, finding format, the library → component-spec mapping, and how to mark items resolved.
Layout
code-reviews/
├── README.md # this file — process overview + pending findings
├── REVIEW-PROCESS.md # how to perform a review and track findings
├── regen-readme.py # regenerates this README from the findings files
├── _template/findings.md # copy-this template for a library review
└── <Library>/findings.md # one folder per ZB.MOM.WW.* shared library
Summary
6 of 6 libraries reviewed. 0 pending findings across all libraries.
Coverage gap: Secrets, LocalDb, GalaxyRepository and Overview have never been reviewed here, and Auth/Health/Theme have changed substantially since their 2026-06-01 review → #15.
| Severity | Open findings |
|---|---|
| Critical | 0 |
| High | 0 |
| Medium | 0 |
| Low | 0 |
| Total | 0 |
Library Status
| Library | Last reviewed | Commit | Open (C/H/M/L) | Open | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audit | 2026-06-01 | 5f75cd4 |
0/0/0/0 | 0 | 5 |
| Auth | 2026-06-01 | 5f75cd4 |
0/0/0/0 | 0 | 6 |
| Configuration | 2026-06-01 | 5f75cd4 |
0/0/0/0 | 0 | 4 |
| Health | 2026-06-01 | 5f75cd4 |
0/0/0/0 | 0 | 6 |
| Telemetry | 2026-06-01 | 5f75cd4 |
0/0/0/0 | 0 | 8 |
| Theme | 2026-06-01 | 5f75cd4 |
0/0/0/0 | 0 | 6 |
Pending Findings
Every Open / In Progress finding across all libraries, highest severity first.
Resolved findings drop off this list but remain recorded in their library's
findings.md (see REVIEW-PROCESS.md §4–§5). Full detail —
description, location, recommendation — lives in the library's findings.md.
Critical (0)
None open.
High (0)
None open.
Medium (0)
None open.
Low (0)
None open.