Baseline code review of the six ZB.MOM.WW.* shared libraries
All six libraries reviewed at commit 5f75cd4 against their components/ specs,
following code-reviews/REVIEW-PROCESS.md. 35 findings (0 Critical, 1 High,
9 Medium, 25 Low); none block adoption.
- Auth 0/0/3/3 (security core sound; startup-validation + key-verify contract gaps)
- Telemetry 0/1/2/5 (HIGH Telemetry-001: redactor 'remove' is a no-op -> secrets reach sinks)
- Health 0/0/2/4 (Akka checks throw instead of Degraded when cluster not yet up)
- Theme 0/0/1/5 (undocumented Bootstrap-collapse JS dep; token/CSS hygiene)
- Audit 0/0/1/4 (composite re-throws OCE vs never-throw writer contract)
- Configuration 0/0/0/4 (DI idempotency, port-parse strictness, packaging)
Cross-cutting: XML docs authored but GenerateDocumentationFile unset -> docs
not shipped in any nupkg (Auth/Health/Telemetry/Configuration/Audit).
README.md regenerated from the per-library findings; regen-readme.py --check passes.
Joseph Doherty
26ba1c7215