Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joseph Doherty cc95590196 test(secrets): scaffold empty Grpc replicator test project (Tasks 2/3 drop files in without shared-file edits)
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014WNM4vjoVksyyBraTXSZE1
2026-08-07 05:57:42 -04:00
Joseph Doherty 5fd7bf524a feat(secrets): scaffold ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets.Replicator.Grpc + secrets_hub.v1 pull-only proto
Adds the third replicator sibling next to Replicator.SqlServer and
Replicator.AkkaDotNet: the central-hosted gRPC secrets hub. This commit is
scaffold only -- project, wire contract, solution wiring -- no service or
client implementation.

The proto mirrors exactly the read half of ISecretReplicationHub
(GetManifestAsync, GetManyAsync). ApplyReplicatedAsync is deliberately NOT
mirrored: in this topology every update originates at central and a site node
is a strict follower, so the narrow contract IS the enforcement -- with no
write RPC on the wire, a mis-wired or compromised site node has no way to push
a row into the hub regardless of what its authorization allows.

Messages are hand-written mirrors of StoredSecret and SecretManifestEntry
rather than serializations of the domain types, following the Akka
replicator's SecretRowDto precedent: the trust boundary stays structural, and
a field added to StoredSecret later cannot start crossing the network merely
by existing. Timestamps are ISO-8601 "O" strings (not google.protobuf.
Timestamp, which cannot round-trip a DateTimeOffset's offset) so a relayed row
is byte-identical to the one central holds; nullable .NET fields use proto3
explicit presence so null and empty string stay distinguishable.

Grpc 2.76.0 / Google.Protobuf 3.34.1 match what ScadaBridge, OtOpcUa and the
sibling ZB.MOM.WW.LocalDb libraries already resolve, so a consumer taking both
gets one Grpc rather than a downgrade warning.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_014WNM4vjoVksyyBraTXSZE1
2026-08-07 05:48:27 -04:00
Joseph Doherty dd0a846b64 feat(secrets): cluster replication via SQL Server and Akka.NET (G-7, 0.2.0)
Secrets were per-node SQLite, so a secret written on one node was invisible to
the rest of a cluster. G-7's design resolved the "shared SQL store vs Akka
replicator" fork to build only the former; both are built here so the choice is
a deployment decision (availability vs partition tolerance) rather than a
library limitation.

Two new packages — ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets.Replicator.SqlServer (shared store, plus a
local-store-with-hub mode) and .Replicator.AkkaDotNet (peer-to-peer over
distributed pub/sub). Core gains ISecretsStoreMigrator, one shared
SecretLastWriterWins predicate so no two stores can disagree on a tie, the
transport-agnostic reconciler, and ReplicatingSecretStore — which closes a real
gap: nothing had ever called ISecretReplicator.PublishAsync, so the seam was
inert and local writes would not have propagated at all.

Verified 182 pass / 1 skip / 0 warnings, including 15 live tests against a real
SQL Server 2022 (the SQLite suite ported case-for-case, so any behavioural
divergence between the stores fails) and a 9-test in-process 2-node Akka
cluster over real remoting. A post-build review caught six defects, all fixed
and now covered: both replication modes could not resolve from the container
(no test had built one), an unbounded fetch that broke past SQL Server's
2100-parameter cap, a poison row that aborted the rest of its batch forever,
Enum.Parse on peer input that could restart the actor in a loop, null crypto
blobs crossing the trust boundary, and a silently dropped pull-read failure.

Packed at 0.2.0 and vulnerability-scanned clean; not yet published to the feed.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BL2Vu1ESDQ9SCN4gVKkdts
2026-07-18 04:08:23 -04:00
Joseph Doherty 824facab39 feat(secrets): scaffold ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets solution + 4 projects 2026-07-15 16:24:38 -04:00