fix(secrets): synchronize SecretsHubSyncStatus getters under the write lock

Review finding (Fix round 1, Task 1): the property getters read their
backing fields without synchronization while RecordSuccess/RecordFailure
write them under _gate, so a concurrent read could observe a torn
DateTimeOffset or a mix of fields from two different writes. Converted the
four auto-properties to explicit properties over private fields, each
getter taking the same lock the writers use. Public interface unchanged.

ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets/src/ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets.Replicator.Grpc/ISecretsHubSyncStatus.cs

@@ -36,21 +36,46 @@ public interface ISecretsHubSyncStatus
 }
 
 /// <summary>The mutable implementation the sync service writes to; consumers see only the interface.</summary>
+/// <remarks>
+/// Writes (<see cref="RecordSuccess"/>/<see cref="RecordFailure"/>) run under <see cref="_gate"/>,
+/// and every getter takes the same lock rather than reading its backing field bare — a plain field
+/// read races the writer with no synchronization otherwise, and a torn/half-written
+/// <see cref="DateTimeOffset"/> (a multi-field struct) or an interleaving that pairs one write's
+/// <c>LastSweepUtc</c> with another write's <c>LastError</c> is exactly the inconsistency a status
+/// consumer must not see.
+/// </remarks>
 internal sealed class SecretsHubSyncStatus : ISecretsHubSyncStatus
 {
     private readonly object _gate = new();
 
-    /// <inheritdoc/>
+    private DateTimeOffset? _lastSweepUtc;
-    public DateTimeOffset? LastSweepUtc { get; private set; }
+    private DateTimeOffset? _lastSuccessUtc;
+    private int _consecutiveFailures;
+    private string? _lastError;
 
     /// <inheritdoc/>
-    public DateTimeOffset? LastSuccessUtc { get; private set; }
+    public DateTimeOffset? LastSweepUtc
+    {
+        get { lock (_gate) { return _lastSweepUtc; } }
+    }
 
     /// <inheritdoc/>
-    public int ConsecutiveFailures { get; private set; }
+    public DateTimeOffset? LastSuccessUtc
+    {
+        get { lock (_gate) { return _lastSuccessUtc; } }
+    }
 
     /// <inheritdoc/>
-    public string? LastError { get; private set; }
+    public int ConsecutiveFailures
+    {
+        get { lock (_gate) { return _consecutiveFailures; } }
+    }
+
+    /// <inheritdoc/>
+    public string? LastError
+    {
+        get { lock (_gate) { return _lastError; } }
+    }
 
     /// <summary>
     /// Records a successful sweep, resetting the failure streak.
@@ -64,10 +89,10 @@ internal sealed class SecretsHubSyncStatus : ISecretsHubSyncStatus
     {
         lock (_gate)
         {
-            int prior = ConsecutiveFailures;
+            int prior = _consecutiveFailures;
-            LastSweepUtc = LastSuccessUtc = now;
+            _lastSweepUtc = _lastSuccessUtc = now;
-            ConsecutiveFailures = 0;
+            _consecutiveFailures = 0;
-            LastError = null;
+            _lastError = null;
             return prior;
         }
     }
@@ -79,9 +104,9 @@ internal sealed class SecretsHubSyncStatus : ISecretsHubSyncStatus
     {
         lock (_gate)
         {
-            LastSweepUtc = now;
+            _lastSweepUtc = now;
-            ConsecutiveFailures++;
+            _consecutiveFailures++;
-            LastError = ex.GetType().Name + ": " + ex.Message;
+            _lastError = ex.GetType().Name + ": " + ex.Message;
         }
     }
 }