fix(deps)!: pin patched SQLitePCLRaw in Secrets + Auth; publish Secrets 0.1.3, Auth 0.1.5
Packing Secrets 0.1.3 surfaced NU1903: Microsoft.Data.Sqlite 10.0.7 pulls SQLitePCLRaw.lib.e_sqlite3 2.1.11, which carries high-severity advisory GHSA-2m69-gcr7-jv3q. Auth.ApiKeys had the same exposure and was already shipped at 0.1.4 to three consumers, so both libs are fixed rather than only the one being published. Fixed the way ZB.MOM.WW.LocalDb already had it: CentralPackageTransitivePinningEnabled plus a pin to the patched 2.1.12. Bumping Microsoft.Data.Sqlite does not help -- even 10.0.10 still resolves 2.1.11 -- so the pin is the actual fix. The pin reaches consumers: both nuspecs now declare SQLitePCLRaw.lib.e_sqlite3 >= 2.1.12 as a direct dependency, verified by restoring the published packages into a scratch project, which resolves 2.1.12 and scans clean. Auth goes 0.1.4 -> 0.1.5 with no API change (0.1.4 plus the pin). Suites re-run after the native-lib swap with identical counts, so no behavioral regression: Secrets 97 pass/1 skip, Auth 215 pass/1 skip (both skips are Windows-only DPAPI and opt-in LDAP). Consumers are NOT yet bumped and remain on vulnerable versions: mxaccessgw 0.1.4, HistorianGateway 0.1.4, ScadaBridge 0.1.3. Secrets consumers all sit at 0.1.2 and also lack KEK rotation. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BL2Vu1ESDQ9SCN4gVKkdts
This commit is contained in:
+10
-1
@@ -3,7 +3,16 @@
|
||||
Divergence of each project from [`spec/SPEC.md`](spec/SPEC.md), and the ordered backlog to
|
||||
reach the shared `ZB.MOM.WW.Auth` library. Status legend: ⛔ gap · 🟡 partial · ✅ matches.
|
||||
|
||||
> **Current state (verified 2026-07-18):** feed carries `0.1.0`–`0.1.4`; consumer pins are
|
||||
> **`0.1.5` PUBLISHED 2026-07-18 — security fix.** `Auth.ApiKeys` `0.1.4` and earlier ship a
|
||||
> high-severity transitive vuln: `Microsoft.Data.Sqlite 10.0.7` pulls
|
||||
> `SQLitePCLRaw.lib.e_sqlite3 2.1.11` (GHSA-2m69-gcr7-jv3q). `0.1.5` pins the patched `2.1.12`
|
||||
> (same approach as `ZB.MOM.WW.LocalDb`); the `.nuspec` declares it directly, so consumers get
|
||||
> the fix on bump without pinning themselves. **No API change** — `0.1.5` is `0.1.4` plus the pin.
|
||||
> **All three ApiKeys consumers are still on vulnerable versions** (mxaccessgw `0.1.4`,
|
||||
> HistorianGateway `0.1.4`, ScadaBridge `0.1.3`) → bump to `0.1.5`. Note ScadaBridge's
|
||||
> `0.1.3`→`0.1.5` jump also crosses the `0.1.4` `ExpiresUtc` verifier change.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Current state (verified 2026-07-18):** feed carries `0.1.0`–`0.1.5`; consumer pins are
|
||||
> OtOpcUa `0.1.1`, ScadaBridge `0.1.3`, MxAccessGateway `0.1.4`, **HistorianGateway `0.1.4`**
|
||||
> (a fourth consumer this file predates, taking all four packages). OtOpcUa is three minors
|
||||
> behind — it does not get the `0.1.4` API-key-expiry enforcement. Library suite: **215 passing,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user