docs: publish LocalDb 0.1.0 to the feed + reconcile component status against verified state
Publishes the three ZB.MOM.WW.LocalDb packages to the Gitea feed (restore-verified from a scratch consumer) and adds the build/push.sh the other shared libs already have. The status prose across CLAUDE.md, README.md and components/*/GAPS.md had drifted from reality, so it was re-derived from the feed listing and the actual PackageReferences + registration calls on each consumer's default branch rather than from prior claims. Five claims were false: Health "not yet adopted" (all four apps wire MapZbHealth), GalaxyRepository's mxaccessgw adoption "a follow-on" (its Server wires AddZbGalaxyRepository), Configuration "not yet pushed", Secrets G-8 "not yet committed", and Theme pinned at 0.2.0 (all four are on 0.3.1). Every doc also said "three apps" while HistorianGateway is a fourth consumer of seven libs, and all eight libraries' test counts were stale (re-ran each suite; all green). Surfaces one previously unrecorded gap: Secrets source is at 0.1.3 with KEK rotation committed, but the feed tops out at 0.1.2, so no app can consume rotation until it is published. Health and observability divergence tables are labelled historical, not re-verified — the libraries are proven wired, but per-app probe coverage vs spec was not re-walked. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BL2Vu1ESDQ9SCN4gVKkdts
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,6 +3,20 @@
|
||||
Divergence of each project from [`spec/SPEC.md`](spec/SPEC.md), and the ordered backlog to
|
||||
reach the shared `ZB.MOM.WW.Health` library. Status legend: ⛔ gap · 🟡 partial · ✅ matches.
|
||||
|
||||
> **✅ ADOPTED — verified 2026-07-18.** This file previously carried no adoption banner and the
|
||||
> root docs claimed the library was "**not yet adopted**". That was stale. Verified directly:
|
||||
> `ZB.MOM.WW.Health` `0.1.0` is on the Gitea feed, and **all four apps reference it and wire
|
||||
> `MapZbHealth`** — OtOpcUa (+ `.Akka` + `.EntityFrameworkCore`, uses `AkkaClusterHealthCheck`),
|
||||
> MxAccessGateway (core only), ScadaBridge (all three packages; uses `AkkaClusterHealthCheck` +
|
||||
> `IActiveNodeGate`), HistorianGateway (core; uses `GrpcDependencyHealthCheck`).
|
||||
>
|
||||
> **Caveat on the evidence:** this was verified by `PackageReference` + registration-call grep,
|
||||
> which proves the library is wired in — *not* that every per-app probe below is registered or
|
||||
> that the endpoint tiers match the spec. The divergence tables further down were written
|
||||
> pre-adoption and have **not** been re-verified against current code; treat them as historical
|
||||
> until someone re-walks them. They also predate HistorianGateway, which is absent from every
|
||||
> table below.
|
||||
|
||||
## Divergence vs spec
|
||||
|
||||
### §1 Endpoint tiers
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user