docs: publish LocalDb 0.1.0 to the feed + reconcile component status against verified state

Publishes the three ZB.MOM.WW.LocalDb packages to the Gitea feed (restore-verified
from a scratch consumer) and adds the build/push.sh the other shared libs already have.

The status prose across CLAUDE.md, README.md and components/*/GAPS.md had drifted from
reality, so it was re-derived from the feed listing and the actual PackageReferences +
registration calls on each consumer's default branch rather than from prior claims.
Five claims were false: Health "not yet adopted" (all four apps wire MapZbHealth),
GalaxyRepository's mxaccessgw adoption "a follow-on" (its Server wires
AddZbGalaxyRepository), Configuration "not yet pushed", Secrets G-8 "not yet
committed", and Theme pinned at 0.2.0 (all four are on 0.3.1). Every doc also said
"three apps" while HistorianGateway is a fourth consumer of seven libs, and all
eight libraries' test counts were stale (re-ran each suite; all green).

Surfaces one previously unrecorded gap: Secrets source is at 0.1.3 with KEK rotation
committed, but the feed tops out at 0.1.2, so no app can consume rotation until it
is published.

Health and observability divergence tables are labelled historical, not re-verified —
the libraries are proven wired, but per-app probe coverage vs spec was not re-walked.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BL2Vu1ESDQ9SCN4gVKkdts
This commit is contained in:
Joseph Doherty
2026-07-18 03:06:49 -04:00
parent 9cb6831380
commit 3dd7aa40ff
11 changed files with 195 additions and 56 deletions
+14
View File
@@ -3,6 +3,20 @@
Divergence of each project from [`spec/SPEC.md`](spec/SPEC.md), and the ordered backlog to
reach the shared `ZB.MOM.WW.Health` library. Status legend: ⛔ gap · 🟡 partial · ✅ matches.
> **✅ ADOPTED — verified 2026-07-18.** This file previously carried no adoption banner and the
> root docs claimed the library was "**not yet adopted**". That was stale. Verified directly:
> `ZB.MOM.WW.Health` `0.1.0` is on the Gitea feed, and **all four apps reference it and wire
> `MapZbHealth`** — OtOpcUa (+ `.Akka` + `.EntityFrameworkCore`, uses `AkkaClusterHealthCheck`),
> MxAccessGateway (core only), ScadaBridge (all three packages; uses `AkkaClusterHealthCheck` +
> `IActiveNodeGate`), HistorianGateway (core; uses `GrpcDependencyHealthCheck`).
>
> **Caveat on the evidence:** this was verified by `PackageReference` + registration-call grep,
> which proves the library is wired in — *not* that every per-app probe below is registered or
> that the endpoint tiers match the spec. The divergence tables further down were written
> pre-adoption and have **not** been re-verified against current code; treat them as historical
> until someone re-walks them. They also predate HistorianGateway, which is absent from every
> table below.
## Divergence vs spec
### §1 Endpoint tiers