fix(site-runtime): resolve SiteRuntime-017..019 — isolated attribute snapshot for child actors, corrected dispatcher doc, remove dead lifecycle handlers
This commit is contained in:
@@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
|
||||
using ScadaLink.Commons.Messages.DataConnection;
|
||||
using ScadaLink.Commons.Messages.DebugView;
|
||||
using ScadaLink.Commons.Messages.Instance;
|
||||
using ScadaLink.Commons.Messages.Lifecycle;
|
||||
using ScadaLink.Commons.Messages.ScriptExecution;
|
||||
using ScadaLink.Commons.Messages.Streaming;
|
||||
using ScadaLink.Commons.Types.Enums;
|
||||
@@ -102,20 +101,13 @@ public class InstanceActor : ReceiveActor
|
||||
// Handle static attribute writes
|
||||
Receive<SetStaticAttributeCommand>(HandleSetStaticAttribute);
|
||||
|
||||
// Handle lifecycle messages
|
||||
Receive<DisableInstanceCommand>(_ =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
_logger.LogInformation("Instance {Instance} received disable command", _instanceUniqueName);
|
||||
Sender.Tell(new InstanceLifecycleResponse(
|
||||
_.CommandId, _instanceUniqueName, true, null, DateTimeOffset.UtcNow));
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Receive<EnableInstanceCommand>(_ =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
_logger.LogInformation("Instance {Instance} received enable command", _instanceUniqueName);
|
||||
Sender.Tell(new InstanceLifecycleResponse(
|
||||
_.CommandId, _instanceUniqueName, true, null, DateTimeOffset.UtcNow));
|
||||
});
|
||||
// SiteRuntime-019: the disable/enable lifecycle is owned entirely by the
|
||||
// Deployment Manager — DeploymentManagerActor.HandleDisable/HandleEnable
|
||||
// stop or re-create the Instance Actor directly and reply to the caller.
|
||||
// DisableInstanceCommand / EnableInstanceCommand are never routed to the
|
||||
// Instance Actor, so no handlers are registered here. (The previous no-op
|
||||
// handlers were dead code that implied a non-existent instance-side
|
||||
// acknowledgement contract.)
|
||||
|
||||
// WP-15: Handle script call requests — route to appropriate Script Actor (Ask pattern)
|
||||
Receive<ScriptCallRequest>(HandleScriptCallRequest);
|
||||
@@ -590,11 +582,25 @@ public class InstanceActor : ReceiveActor
|
||||
/// WP-15: Script Actors spawned per script definition.
|
||||
/// WP-16: Alarm Actors spawned per alarm definition, as peers to Script Actors.
|
||||
/// WP-32: Compilation errors reject entire instance deployment (logged but actor still starts).
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// SiteRuntime-017: each child is seeded from a private point-in-time snapshot
|
||||
/// of <c>_attributes</c>, NOT the live dictionary. The snapshot is taken here on
|
||||
/// the Instance Actor thread, so it is race-free; handing the live mutable
|
||||
/// <see cref="System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary{TKey,TValue}"/> by reference
|
||||
/// would let a child constructor enumerate it on the child's mailbox thread while
|
||||
/// this actor mutates it in <c>HandleAttributeValueChanged</c>.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
private void CreateChildActors()
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (_configuration == null) return;
|
||||
|
||||
// SiteRuntime-017: snapshot the live attribute dictionary once, on the
|
||||
// Instance Actor thread, before any child is constructed. Each child
|
||||
// Props closure captures this immutable copy instead of the mutable
|
||||
// _attributes field, so no child constructor ever enumerates a
|
||||
// dictionary this actor is concurrently mutating.
|
||||
var attributeSnapshot = new Dictionary<string, object?>(_attributes);
|
||||
|
||||
// Create Script Actors
|
||||
foreach (var script in _configuration.Scripts)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -622,7 +628,7 @@ public class InstanceActor : ReceiveActor
|
||||
_options,
|
||||
_logger,
|
||||
triggerExpression,
|
||||
_attributes,
|
||||
attributeSnapshot,
|
||||
_healthCollector,
|
||||
_serviceProvider));
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -672,7 +678,7 @@ public class InstanceActor : ReceiveActor
|
||||
_options,
|
||||
_logger,
|
||||
triggerExpression,
|
||||
_attributes,
|
||||
attributeSnapshot,
|
||||
_healthCollector));
|
||||
|
||||
var actorRef = Context.ActorOf(props, $"alarm-{alarm.CanonicalName}");
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user