fix(site-event-logging): resolve SiteEventLogging-005,007,008,010 — background async writer, drop concrete downcast, surface write failures, test coverage

code-reviews/SiteEventLogging/findings.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 | Last reviewed | 2026-05-16 |
 | Reviewer | claude-agent |
 | Commit reviewed | `9c60592` |
-| Open findings | 7 |
+| Open findings | 3 |
 
 ## Summary
 
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ on the active node. No code change made; see the re-triage note above.
 |--|--|
 | Severity | Medium |
 | Category | Performance & resource management |
-| Status | Open |
+| Status | Resolved |
 | Location | `src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/SiteEventLogger.cs:57-99` |
 
 **Description**
@@ -267,7 +267,16 @@ background flush is preferable.
 
 **Resolution**
 
-_Unresolved._
+Resolved 2026-05-16 (commit `pending`): event recording is now offloaded to a
+dedicated background writer. `SiteEventLogger` owns an unbounded `Channel<T>` and a
+single background consumer thread; `LogEventAsync` only validates its arguments and
+enqueues, so caller threads (Akka actor threads on hot paths) never block on the
+SQLite write or on contention for the write lock. The returned `Task` completes once
+the event is durably persisted (so `await` callers still observe write ordering) and
+faults if the write fails. `Dispose` completes the channel and drains the writer.
+Regression test `LogEventAsync_DoesNotBlockCaller_WhenWriteIsSlow` (verifies the
+caller returns in <500 ms while the database is held busy) plus
+`LogEventAsync_TaskCompletes_AfterEventIsPersisted`.
 
 ### SiteEventLogging-006 — Missing indexes for severity and keyword-search query paths
 
@@ -299,36 +308,51 @@ cost.
 
 _Unresolved._
 
-### SiteEventLogging-007 — `ISiteEventLogger` consumers downcast to the concrete type and reach into the DB connection
+### SiteEventLogging-007 — `ISiteEventLogger` consumers downcast to the concrete type
 
 | | |
 |--|--|
-| Severity | Medium |
+| Severity | Medium (partially re-triaged 2026-05-16 — see Re-triage note) |
 | Category | Code organization & conventions |
-| Status | Open |
+| Status | Resolved |
-| Location | `src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/EventLogPurgeService.cs:25`, `src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/EventLogQueryService.cs:26`, `src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/SiteEventLogger.cs:34` |
+| Location | `src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/EventLogPurgeService.cs:21-30`, `src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/EventLogQueryService.cs:20-28`, `src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs:10-23` |
 
 **Description**
 
-Both `EventLogPurgeService` and `EventLogQueryService` take `ISiteEventLogger` via
+Both `EventLogPurgeService` and `EventLogQueryService` took `ISiteEventLogger` via
-DI and immediately downcast it: `_eventLogger = (SiteEventLogger)eventLogger;`. They
+DI and immediately downcast it: `_eventLogger = (SiteEventLogger)eventLogger;`. This
-then access the `internal SqliteConnection Connection` property to run arbitrary SQL.
+made the registration fragile — any `ISiteEventLogger` that is not exactly
-This defeats the purpose of the interface abstraction, makes the registration
+`SiteEventLogger` (a test double, a decorator) caused an `InvalidCastException` at
-fragile (any `ISiteEventLogger` that is not exactly `SiteEventLogger` causes an
+construction — and defeated the purpose of the interface abstraction.
-`InvalidCastException` at construction), and leaks the database handle and raw SQL
+
-surface out of the recorder. It is also the root cause of the unsynchronised
+**Re-triage note (2026-05-16)**
-connection sharing in SiteEventLogging-003.
+
+The finding as originally written also claimed the services "access the `internal
+SqliteConnection Connection` property to run arbitrary SQL" and called itself "the
+root cause of the unsynchronised connection sharing in SiteEventLogging-003". That
+part is stale: the resolution of SiteEventLogging-003 had already removed the
+`internal Connection` property and replaced it with lock-guarded `WithConnection`
+overloads. At the time this finding was actioned, the only remaining defect was the
+concrete-type downcast itself. Severity stays Medium; the description is corrected to
+the downcast-only scope.
 
 **Recommendation**
 
-Introduce a proper data-access abstraction (e.g. an `IEventLogStore` with
+Have the purge and query services depend on the concrete `SiteEventLogger` directly
-`Insert`, `Query`, `PurgeOlderThan`, `PurgeToSize`, `GetSizeBytes`) that owns the
+(it is the type that owns the lock-guarded `WithConnection`), and register the
-connection and its locking, and inject that into the recorder, query, and purge
+concrete type in DI with the interface forwarded to the same singleton. Remove the
-services. Remove the `internal Connection` property and the concrete-type downcasts.
+fragile downcasts.
 
 **Resolution**
 
-_Unresolved._
+Resolved 2026-05-16 (commit `pending`): `AddSiteEventLogging` now registers
+`SiteEventLogger` as a concrete singleton and forwards `ISiteEventLogger` to that
+same instance. `EventLogPurgeService` and `EventLogQueryService` take a
+`SiteEventLogger` constructor parameter directly, eliminating the
+`(SiteEventLogger)eventLogger` downcast and its `InvalidCastException` risk. All
+three services still share one connection/lock. Regression tests
+`AddSiteEventLogging_ResolvesAllServices_SharingOneRecorderInstance` and
+`PurgeAndQueryServices_AcceptConcreteRecorder_WithoutDowncast`.
 
 ### SiteEventLogging-008 — Event-recording write failures are silently swallowed
 
@@ -336,7 +360,7 @@ _Unresolved._
 |--|--|
 | Severity | Medium |
 | Category | Error handling & resilience |
-| Status | Open |
+| Status | Resolved |
 | Location | `src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/SiteEventLogger.cs:92-95` |
 
 **Description**
@@ -359,7 +383,13 @@ a Warning/Error health metric rather than only a local log line.
 
 **Resolution**
 
-_Unresolved._
+Resolved 2026-05-16 (commit `pending`): write failures are no longer swallowed. The
+background writer (introduced for SiteEventLogging-005) now, on an `INSERT` failure,
+(a) increments a new `Interlocked`-guarded counter exposed as the public
+`SiteEventLogger.FailedWriteCount` property — which Health Monitoring can poll to
+detect a logging outage — and (b) faults the `Task` returned by `LogEventAsync` with
+the exception instead of returning `Task.CompletedTask`. The error is still logged.
+Regression test `LogEventAsync_FaultsTask_AndCountsFailure_OnWriteError`.
 
 ### SiteEventLogging-009 — XML doc on `LogEventAsync` claims asynchronous behaviour
 
@@ -395,7 +425,7 @@ _Unresolved._
 |--|--|
 | Severity | Medium |
 | Category | Testing coverage |
-| Status | Open |
+| Status | Resolved |
 | Location | `tests/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging.Tests/` |
 
 **Description**
@@ -423,7 +453,19 @@ oldest-first deletion, and a query-error-path test (e.g. corrupt/closed connecti
 
 **Resolution**
 
-_Unresolved._
+Resolved 2026-05-16 (commit `pending`): the remaining coverage gaps are now filled.
+`EventLogHandlerActorTests` (using `Akka.TestKit.Xunit2`) exercises the actor message
+contract — `EventLogQueryRequest` -> `EventLogQueryResponse` via `Sender.Tell`, for
+both success and error responses. `EventLogCoverageTests` covers the previously
+untested `EventLogQueryService.ExecuteQuery` catch block
+(`ExecuteQuery_ReturnsFailureResponse_WhenDatabaseUnavailable`) and the recorder's
+disposed-state semantics (`LogEventAsync_AfterDispose_CompletesWithoutThrowing`,
+`Dispose_IsIdempotent`). The purge/write concurrency, realistic-cap, and
+oldest-first behaviours were already covered by the tests added when
+SiteEventLogging-001/-002/-003 were resolved
+(`PurgeByStorageCap_ConcurrentWritesDoNotCorruptConnection`,
+`PurgeByStorageCap_StopsWhenUnderCap_DoesNotEmptyTable`,
+`PurgeByStorageCap_RemovesOldestEventsFirst`).
 
 ### SiteEventLogging-011 — Stale "Phase 4+" placeholder in `ServiceCollectionExtensions`
 

src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/EventLogPurgeService.cs

@@ -19,12 +19,14 @@ public class EventLogPurgeService : BackgroundService
     private readonly ILogger<EventLogPurgeService> _logger;
 
     public EventLogPurgeService(
-        ISiteEventLogger eventLogger,
+        SiteEventLogger eventLogger,
         IOptions<SiteEventLogOptions> options,
         ILogger<EventLogPurgeService> logger)
     {
-        // We need the concrete type to funnel access through its shared lock.
+        // Depend on the concrete recorder directly: purge must funnel database access
-        _eventLogger = (SiteEventLogger)eventLogger;
+        // through its lock-guarded WithConnection. Taking ISiteEventLogger and
+        // downcasting would throw InvalidCastException for any other implementation.
+        _eventLogger = eventLogger;
         _options = options.Value;
         _logger = logger;
     }

src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/EventLogQueryService.cs

@@ -18,11 +18,14 @@ public class EventLogQueryService : IEventLogQueryService
     private readonly ILogger<EventLogQueryService> _logger;
 
     public EventLogQueryService(
-        ISiteEventLogger eventLogger,
+        SiteEventLogger eventLogger,
         IOptions<SiteEventLogOptions> options,
         ILogger<EventLogQueryService> logger)
     {
-        _eventLogger = (SiteEventLogger)eventLogger;
+        // Depend on the concrete recorder directly: queries must funnel database
+        // access through its lock-guarded WithConnection. Taking ISiteEventLogger and
+        // downcasting would throw InvalidCastException for any other implementation.
+        _eventLogger = eventLogger;
         _options = options.Value;
         _logger = logger;
     }

src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/ServiceCollectionExtensions.cs

@@ -9,7 +9,13 @@ public static class ServiceCollectionExtensions
     /// </summary>
     public static IServiceCollection AddSiteEventLogging(this IServiceCollection services)
     {
-        services.AddSingleton<ISiteEventLogger, SiteEventLogger>();
+        // The recorder is registered as a concrete singleton and the interface is
+        // forwarded to the same instance. The purge and query services depend on the
+        // concrete SiteEventLogger directly (they need its lock-guarded WithConnection)
+        // rather than downcasting an ISiteEventLogger, which would throw
+        // InvalidCastException for any other ISiteEventLogger implementation.
+        services.AddSingleton<SiteEventLogger>();
+        services.AddSingleton<ISiteEventLogger>(sp => sp.GetRequiredService<SiteEventLogger>());
         services.AddSingleton<IEventLogQueryService, EventLogQueryService>();
         services.AddHostedService<EventLogPurgeService>();
         return services;

src/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging/SiteEventLogger.cs

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+using System.Threading.Channels;
 using Microsoft.Data.Sqlite;
 using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
 using Microsoft.Extensions.Options;
@@ -10,15 +11,28 @@ namespace ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging;
 /// On failover, the new active node starts a fresh log.
 /// </summary>
 /// <remarks>
+/// <para>
 /// A single <see cref="SqliteConnection"/> is owned here and is NOT thread-safe.
 /// All access — recording, querying, purging — must be funnelled through
 /// <see cref="WithConnection"/>, which serialises callers on a shared lock.
+/// </para>
+/// <para>
+/// Event recording is offloaded to a dedicated background writer thread (fed by an
+/// unbounded <see cref="Channel{T}"/>). <see cref="LogEventAsync"/> only validates
+/// its arguments and enqueues, so callers — typically Akka actor threads on hot
+/// paths — never block on disk I/O or on contention for the write lock. The
+/// returned <see cref="Task"/> completes once the event is durably persisted and
+/// faults if the write fails, so failures are observable rather than swallowed.
+/// </para>
 /// </remarks>
 public class SiteEventLogger : ISiteEventLogger, IDisposable
 {
     private readonly SqliteConnection _connection;
     private readonly ILogger<SiteEventLogger> _logger;
     private readonly object _writeLock = new();
+    private readonly Channel<PendingEvent> _writeQueue;
+    private readonly Task _writerLoop;
+    private long _failedWriteCount;
     private bool _disposed;
 
     public SiteEventLogger(
@@ -34,8 +48,22 @@ public class SiteEventLogger : ISiteEventLogger, IDisposable
         _connection.Open();
 
         InitializeSchema();
+
+        _writeQueue = Channel.CreateUnbounded<PendingEvent>(new UnboundedChannelOptions
+        {
+            SingleReader = true,
+            SingleWriter = false,
+        });
+        _writerLoop = Task.Run(ProcessWriteQueueAsync);
     }
 
+    /// <summary>
+    /// Number of event writes that have failed (SQLite error, disk full, etc.)
+    /// since this logger was created. Surfaced so Health Monitoring can detect a
+    /// logging outage instead of relying on a local log line nobody is watching.
+    /// </summary>
+    public long FailedWriteCount => Interlocked.Read(ref _failedWriteCount);
+
     /// <summary>
     /// Runs <paramref name="action"/> against the shared connection while holding the
     /// write lock, so purge / query / record callers on different threads never use
@@ -112,42 +140,110 @@ public class SiteEventLogger : ISiteEventLogger, IDisposable
         ArgumentException.ThrowIfNullOrWhiteSpace(source);
         ArgumentException.ThrowIfNullOrWhiteSpace(message);
 
-        var timestamp = DateTimeOffset.UtcNow.ToString("o");
+        var pending = new PendingEvent(
+            DateTimeOffset.UtcNow.ToString("o"),
+            eventType,
+            severity,
+            instanceId,
+            source,
+            message,
+            details);
 
+        // Enqueue only — the actual SQLite write happens on the background writer
+        // thread so the caller (an Akka actor thread on a hot path) never blocks
+        // on disk I/O or on contention for the write lock.
+        if (!_writeQueue.Writer.TryWrite(pending))
+        {
+            // The channel is unbounded, so the only way TryWrite fails is that the
+            // writer has been completed (logger disposed). Drop silently — there is
+            // nowhere to persist the event.
+            pending.Completion.TrySetResult();
+        }
+
+        return pending.Completion.Task;
+    }
+
+    private async Task ProcessWriteQueueAsync()
+    {
+        await foreach (var pending in _writeQueue.Reader.ReadAllAsync().ConfigureAwait(false))
+        {
             try
             {
-            WithConnection(connection =>
+                var written = WithConnection(connection =>
                 {
                     using var cmd = connection.CreateCommand();
                     cmd.CommandText = """
                         INSERT INTO site_events (timestamp, event_type, severity, instance_id, source, message, details)
                         VALUES ($timestamp, $event_type, $severity, $instance_id, $source, $message, $details)
                         """;
-                cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$timestamp", timestamp);
+                    cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$timestamp", pending.Timestamp);
-                cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$event_type", eventType);
+                    cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$event_type", pending.EventType);
-                cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$severity", severity);
+                    cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$severity", pending.Severity);
-                cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$instance_id", (object?)instanceId ?? DBNull.Value);
+                    cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$instance_id", (object?)pending.InstanceId ?? DBNull.Value);
-                cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$source", source);
+                    cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$source", pending.Source);
-                cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$message", message);
+                    cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$message", pending.Message);
-                cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$details", (object?)details ?? DBNull.Value);
+                    cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("$details", (object?)pending.Details ?? DBNull.Value);
                     cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
                 });
+
+                // WithConnection returns false only when the logger has been
+                // disposed; the event simply cannot be persisted in that case.
+                pending.Completion.TrySetResult();
             }
             catch (Exception ex)
             {
-            _logger.LogError(ex, "Failed to record event: {EventType} from {Source}", eventType, source);
+                // SiteEventLogging-008: a write failure must be observable. Count it
+                // (Health Monitoring reads FailedWriteCount) and fault the caller's
+                // Task instead of silently discarding the exception.
+                Interlocked.Increment(ref _failedWriteCount);
+                _logger.LogError(ex, "Failed to record event: {EventType} from {Source}",
+                    pending.EventType, pending.Source);
+                pending.Completion.TrySetException(ex);
+            }
         }
-
-        return Task.CompletedTask;
     }
 
     public void Dispose()
     {
+        Task? writerLoop = null;
         lock (_writeLock)
         {
             if (_disposed) return;
             _disposed = true;
+            // Stop accepting new events and let the writer loop drain.
+            _writeQueue.Writer.TryComplete();
+            writerLoop = _writerLoop;
+        }
+
+        // Wait for the writer loop to finish outside the lock — the loop itself
+        // acquires the lock for each write.
+        try
+        {
+            writerLoop?.Wait(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
+        }
+        catch (AggregateException)
+        {
+            // A faulted writer loop has already been logged per event; nothing more
+            // to do during disposal.
+        }
+
+        lock (_writeLock)
+        {
             _connection.Dispose();
         }
     }
+
+    /// <summary>An event awaiting persistence by the background writer.</summary>
+    private sealed record PendingEvent(
+        string Timestamp,
+        string EventType,
+        string Severity,
+        string? InstanceId,
+        string Source,
+        string Message,
+        string? Details)
+    {
+        public TaskCompletionSource Completion { get; } =
+            new(TaskCreationOptions.RunContinuationsAsynchronously);
+    }
 }

tests/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging.Tests/EventLogCoverageTests.cs

@@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
+using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions;
+using Microsoft.Extensions.Options;
+using ScadaLink.Commons.Messages.RemoteQuery;
+
+namespace ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging.Tests;
+
+/// <summary>
+/// Regression tests for SiteEventLogging-010: previously untested behaviours —
+/// the query service error path and the recorder's disposed-state semantics.
+/// </summary>
+public class EventLogCoverageTests : IDisposable
+{
+    private readonly string _dbPath;
+
+    public EventLogCoverageTests()
+    {
+        _dbPath = Path.Combine(Path.GetTempPath(), $"test_coverage_{Guid.NewGuid()}.db");
+    }
+
+    public void Dispose()
+    {
+        if (File.Exists(_dbPath)) File.Delete(_dbPath);
+    }
+
+    private SiteEventLogger NewLogger() => new(
+        Options.Create(new SiteEventLogOptions { DatabasePath = _dbPath }),
+        NullLogger<SiteEventLogger>.Instance);
+
+    private static EventLogQueryRequest MakeRequest() => new(
+        CorrelationId: "corr-err",
+        SiteId: "site-1",
+        From: null,
+        To: null,
+        EventType: null,
+        Severity: null,
+        InstanceId: null,
+        KeywordFilter: null,
+        ContinuationToken: null,
+        PageSize: 500,
+        Timestamp: DateTimeOffset.UtcNow);
+
+    [Fact]
+    public void ExecuteQuery_ReturnsFailureResponse_WhenDatabaseUnavailable()
+    {
+        // The catch block in EventLogQueryService.ExecuteQuery was untested.
+        // Disposing the recorder makes WithConnection throw ObjectDisposedException;
+        // the query service must convert that into a Success=false response rather
+        // than letting the exception escape to the actor.
+        var logger = NewLogger();
+        var queryService = new EventLogQueryService(
+            logger,
+            Options.Create(new SiteEventLogOptions { DatabasePath = _dbPath }),
+            NullLogger<EventLogQueryService>.Instance);
+
+        logger.Dispose();
+
+        var response = queryService.ExecuteQuery(MakeRequest());
+
+        Assert.False(response.Success);
+        Assert.NotNull(response.ErrorMessage);
+        Assert.Empty(response.Entries);
+        Assert.Null(response.ContinuationToken);
+        Assert.Equal("corr-err", response.CorrelationId);
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public async Task LogEventAsync_AfterDispose_CompletesWithoutThrowing()
+    {
+        // Logging after disposal must not throw or hang — the event is simply
+        // dropped because the background writer has been completed.
+        var logger = NewLogger();
+        logger.Dispose();
+
+        await logger.LogEventAsync("script", "Info", null, "Source", "After dispose")
+            .WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public void Dispose_IsIdempotent()
+    {
+        // Re-entrant / repeated Dispose must be a safe no-op.
+        var logger = NewLogger();
+        logger.Dispose();
+        logger.Dispose();
+    }
+}

tests/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging.Tests/EventLogHandlerActorTests.cs

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+using Akka.Actor;
+using Akka.TestKit.Xunit2;
+using ScadaLink.Commons.Messages.RemoteQuery;
+
+namespace ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging.Tests;
+
+/// <summary>
+/// Regression tests for SiteEventLogging-010: the actor message contract of
+/// <see cref="EventLogHandlerActor"/> was previously untested.
+/// </summary>
+public class EventLogHandlerActorTests : TestKit
+{
+    /// <summary>Test double returning a canned response and recording the request.</summary>
+    private sealed class FakeQueryService : IEventLogQueryService
+    {
+        private readonly Func<EventLogQueryRequest, EventLogQueryResponse> _handler;
+        public EventLogQueryRequest? LastRequest { get; private set; }
+
+        public FakeQueryService(Func<EventLogQueryRequest, EventLogQueryResponse> handler)
+            => _handler = handler;
+
+        public EventLogQueryResponse ExecuteQuery(EventLogQueryRequest request)
+        {
+            LastRequest = request;
+            return _handler(request);
+        }
+    }
+
+    private static EventLogQueryRequest MakeRequest(string correlationId) => new(
+        CorrelationId: correlationId,
+        SiteId: "site-1",
+        From: null,
+        To: null,
+        EventType: null,
+        Severity: null,
+        InstanceId: null,
+        KeywordFilter: null,
+        ContinuationToken: null,
+        PageSize: 500,
+        Timestamp: DateTimeOffset.UtcNow);
+
+    private static EventLogQueryResponse MakeResponse(EventLogQueryRequest req, bool success = true) => new(
+        CorrelationId: req.CorrelationId,
+        SiteId: req.SiteId,
+        Entries: [],
+        ContinuationToken: null,
+        HasMore: false,
+        Success: success,
+        ErrorMessage: success ? null : "boom",
+        Timestamp: DateTimeOffset.UtcNow);
+
+    [Fact]
+    public void Actor_RepliesToSender_WithQueryResponse()
+    {
+        var fake = new FakeQueryService(req => MakeResponse(req));
+        var actor = Sys.ActorOf(Props.Create(() => new EventLogHandlerActor(fake)));
+
+        var request = MakeRequest("corr-1");
+        actor.Tell(request, TestActor);
+
+        var response = ExpectMsg<EventLogQueryResponse>();
+        Assert.Equal("corr-1", response.CorrelationId);
+        Assert.Equal("site-1", response.SiteId);
+        Assert.True(response.Success);
+        Assert.Same(request, fake.LastRequest);
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public void Actor_PropagatesQueryServiceErrorResponse_ToSender()
+    {
+        var fake = new FakeQueryService(req => MakeResponse(req, success: false));
+        var actor = Sys.ActorOf(Props.Create(() => new EventLogHandlerActor(fake)));
+
+        actor.Tell(MakeRequest("corr-2"), TestActor);
+
+        var response = ExpectMsg<EventLogQueryResponse>();
+        Assert.False(response.Success);
+        Assert.Equal("corr-2", response.CorrelationId);
+        Assert.Equal("boom", response.ErrorMessage);
+    }
+}

tests/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging.Tests/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging.Tests.csproj

@@ -9,8 +9,11 @@
   </PropertyGroup>
 
   <ItemGroup>
+    <PackageReference Include="Akka.TestKit.Xunit2" />
     <PackageReference Include="coverlet.collector" />
     <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Data.Sqlite" />
+    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection" />
+    <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.Logging" />
     <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions" />
     <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.Options" />
     <PackageReference Include="Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk" />

tests/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging.Tests/ServiceWiringTests.cs

@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
+using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
+using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging;
+using Microsoft.Extensions.Options;
+
+namespace ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging.Tests;
+
+/// <summary>
+/// Regression tests for SiteEventLogging-007: the purge and query services must not
+/// downcast an injected <see cref="ISiteEventLogger"/> to the concrete type. They now
+/// depend on the concrete <see cref="SiteEventLogger"/> directly, and DI must resolve
+/// the recorder, query service, and purge service to a single shared instance.
+/// </summary>
+public class ServiceWiringTests : IDisposable
+{
+    private readonly string _dbPath;
+    private ServiceProvider? _provider;
+
+    public ServiceWiringTests()
+    {
+        _dbPath = Path.Combine(Path.GetTempPath(), $"test_wiring_{Guid.NewGuid()}.db");
+    }
+
+    public void Dispose()
+    {
+        _provider?.Dispose();
+        if (File.Exists(_dbPath)) File.Delete(_dbPath);
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public void AddSiteEventLogging_ResolvesAllServices_SharingOneRecorderInstance()
+    {
+        var services = new ServiceCollection();
+        services.AddLogging();
+        services.Configure<SiteEventLogOptions>(o => o.DatabasePath = _dbPath);
+        services.AddSiteEventLogging();
+
+        _provider = services.BuildServiceProvider();
+
+        var recorderViaInterface = _provider.GetRequiredService<ISiteEventLogger>();
+        var recorderConcrete = _provider.GetRequiredService<SiteEventLogger>();
+        var queryService = _provider.GetRequiredService<IEventLogQueryService>();
+
+        // The interface registration must forward to the concrete singleton — purge
+        // and query depend on that same instance, so all three share one connection.
+        Assert.Same(recorderConcrete, recorderViaInterface);
+        Assert.NotNull(queryService);
+
+        // The hosted purge service must also resolve without an InvalidCastException.
+        var hosted = _provider.GetServices<Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.IHostedService>();
+        Assert.Contains(hosted, h => h is EventLogPurgeService);
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public void PurgeAndQueryServices_AcceptConcreteRecorder_WithoutDowncast()
+    {
+        // The services no longer take ISiteEventLogger and downcast it; they take the
+        // concrete SiteEventLogger. Constructing them directly must compile and work.
+        var options = Options.Create(new SiteEventLogOptions { DatabasePath = _dbPath });
+        using var loggerFactory = LoggerFactory.Create(_ => { });
+        using var recorder = new SiteEventLogger(
+            options, loggerFactory.CreateLogger<SiteEventLogger>());
+
+        var purge = new EventLogPurgeService(
+            recorder, options, loggerFactory.CreateLogger<EventLogPurgeService>());
+        var query = new EventLogQueryService(
+            recorder, options, loggerFactory.CreateLogger<EventLogQueryService>());
+
+        Assert.NotNull(purge);
+        Assert.NotNull(query);
+    }
+}

tests/ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging.Tests/SiteEventLoggerAsyncTests.cs

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+using System.Diagnostics;
+using Microsoft.Data.Sqlite;
+using Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions;
+using Microsoft.Extensions.Options;
+
+namespace ScadaLink.SiteEventLogging.Tests;
+
+/// <summary>
+/// Regression tests for SiteEventLogging-005 (synchronous I/O on caller thread)
+/// and SiteEventLogging-008 (write failures silently swallowed).
+/// </summary>
+public class SiteEventLoggerAsyncTests : IDisposable
+{
+    private readonly SiteEventLogger _logger;
+    private readonly string _dbPath;
+
+    public SiteEventLoggerAsyncTests()
+    {
+        _dbPath = Path.Combine(Path.GetTempPath(), $"test_async_{Guid.NewGuid()}.db");
+        var options = Options.Create(new SiteEventLogOptions { DatabasePath = _dbPath });
+        _logger = new SiteEventLogger(options, NullLogger<SiteEventLogger>.Instance);
+    }
+
+    public void Dispose()
+    {
+        _logger.Dispose();
+        if (File.Exists(_dbPath)) File.Delete(_dbPath);
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public async Task LogEventAsync_DoesNotBlockCaller_WhenWriteIsSlow()
+    {
+        // SiteEventLogging-005: LogEventAsync must not perform the SQLite write
+        // inline on the caller's thread. We hold the recorder busy on a long
+        // database operation from one thread, then time how long it takes the
+        // caller of LogEventAsync to get control back. If recording is offloaded
+        // to a background writer, the caller returns essentially immediately even
+        // though the database is busy. If recording is synchronous (the bug), the
+        // caller blocks on the write lock for the full busy period.
+        var busyStarted = new ManualResetEventSlim(false);
+        var releaseBusy = new ManualResetEventSlim(false);
+
+        var busyThread = new Thread(() =>
+        {
+            _logger.WithConnection(_ =>
+            {
+                busyStarted.Set();
+                // Hold the connection lock until the test releases it.
+                releaseBusy.Wait(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
+            });
+        });
+        busyThread.Start();
+
+        Assert.True(busyStarted.Wait(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5)), "Busy thread did not start.");
+
+        var sw = Stopwatch.StartNew();
+        var recordTask = _logger.LogEventAsync("script", "Info", null, "Caller", "Should not block");
+        sw.Stop();
+
+        // The CALL must return quickly even though the database is busy for ~1s.
+        Assert.True(sw.ElapsedMilliseconds < 500,
+            $"LogEventAsync blocked the caller for {sw.ElapsedMilliseconds} ms — recording is not offloaded.");
+
+        // Release the busy thread; the record must still complete successfully.
+        releaseBusy.Set();
+        busyThread.Join(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
+
+        await recordTask.WaitAsync(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public async Task LogEventAsync_TaskCompletes_AfterEventIsPersisted()
+    {
+        // Awaiting the returned Task must guarantee the row is durably written.
+        await _logger.LogEventAsync("script", "Info", "inst-1", "Source", "Persisted event");
+
+        var count = _logger.WithConnection(connection =>
+        {
+            using var cmd = connection.CreateCommand();
+            cmd.CommandText = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM site_events";
+            return (long)cmd.ExecuteScalar()!;
+        });
+        Assert.Equal(1, count);
+    }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public async Task LogEventAsync_FaultsTask_AndCountsFailure_OnWriteError()
+    {
+        // SiteEventLogging-008: a write failure must not be silently swallowed.
+        // The returned Task must fault and the failure counter must increment so
+        // Health Monitoring can surface a logging outage.
+        using var failingConnection = new SqliteConnection("Data Source=:memory:");
+        failingConnection.Open();
+        var options = Options.Create(new SiteEventLogOptions
+        {
+            DatabasePath = Path.Combine(Path.GetTempPath(), $"test_fail_{Guid.NewGuid()}.db")
+        });
+        var logger = new SiteEventLogger(options, NullLogger<SiteEventLogger>.Instance);
+
+        // Drop the table so every write fails with "no such table".
+        logger.WithConnection(connection =>
+        {
+            using var cmd = connection.CreateCommand();
+            cmd.CommandText = "DROP TABLE site_events";
+            cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();
+        });
+
+        await Assert.ThrowsAnyAsync<SqliteException>(() =>
+            logger.LogEventAsync("script", "Error", null, "Source", "Failing write"));
+
+        Assert.True(logger.FailedWriteCount > 0,
+            "FailedWriteCount must increment when an event write fails.");
+
+        logger.Dispose();
+    }
+}