Files
natsdotnet/docs/plans/2026-02-23-jetstream-remaining-parity-plan.md
2026-02-23 09:51:21 -05:00

40 KiB

JetStream Remaining Parity Implementation Plan

For Codex: REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use executeplan to implement this plan task-by-task.

Goal: Port all remaining JetStream features from Go to .NET, including missing API subjects, runtime semantics, storage/recovery behavior, and cluster/RAFT control operations, then update parity evidence and differences.md.

Architecture: Execute in behavior-core-first slices. First create an explicit parity inventory and API matrix, then complete runtime/state semantics for streams and consumers, then wire remaining $JS.API.* families to those semantics. Finish with storage/RAFT/monitoring parity, dual-gate verification evidence, and differences.md updates.

Tech Stack: .NET 10, C# 14, xUnit 3, Shouldly, NSubstitute, NATS.NKeys, Serilog, bash scripts, ripgrep.


Execution guardrails

  • Use @test-driven-development in every task.
  • Use @systematic-debugging if observed behavior diverges from test intent.
  • Run @verification-before-completion before any success claim.
  • Perform this plan in a dedicated worktree to keep parity work isolated.

Task 1: Build Remaining Feature Inventory and API Matrix

Files:

  • Create: scripts/jetstream/extract-go-js-api.sh
  • Create: docs/plans/2026-02-23-jetstream-remaining-parity-map.md
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamApiInventoryTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public void Go_inventory_contains_api_subjects_not_yet_mapped_in_dotnet()
{
    var inventory = JetStreamApiInventory.LoadFromGoConstants();
    inventory.GoSubjects.ShouldContain("$JS.API.STREAM.UPDATE.*");
    inventory.GoSubjects.ShouldContain("$JS.API.CONSUMER.MSG.NEXT.*.*");
    inventory.GoSubjects.Count.ShouldBeGreaterThan(20);
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamApiInventoryTests.Go_inventory_contains_api_subjects_not_yet_mapped_in_dotnet" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL with missing inventory loader/script output.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -euo pipefail
rg -n -F '$JS.API' golang/nats-server/server/jetstream_api.go \
  | awk -F: '{print $3}' \
  | sed -E 's/.*"(\$JS\.API[^\"]+)".*/\1/' \
  | sort -u
# JetStream Remaining Parity Map

| Go Subject | .NET Route | Status | Test |
|---|---|---|---|
| $JS.API.STREAM.UPDATE.* | (pending) | pending | (pending) |

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamApiInventoryTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add scripts/jetstream/extract-go-js-api.sh docs/plans/2026-02-23-jetstream-remaining-parity-map.md tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamApiInventoryTests.cs
git commit -m "test: add jetstream remaining api inventory and parity map scaffold"

Task 2: Wire $JS.API.* Request/Reply Through NATS Message Path

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/NatsServer.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/NatsClient.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamApiProtocolIntegrationTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Js_api_request_over_pub_reply_returns_response_message()
{
    await using var server = await ServerFixture.StartJetStreamEnabledAsync();
    var response = await server.RequestAsync("$JS.API.INFO", "{}", timeoutMs: 1000);

    response.ShouldContain("\"error\"");
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamApiProtocolIntegrationTests.Js_api_request_over_pub_reply_returns_response_message" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL because $JS.API.* is not processed in protocol request path.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

if (replyTo != null && subject.StartsWith("$JS.API", StringComparison.Ordinal) && _jetStreamApiRouter != null)
{
    var api = _jetStreamApiRouter.Route(subject, payload.Span);
    sender.SendJetStreamApiResponse(replyTo, api);
    return;
}

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamApiProtocolIntegrationTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/NatsServer.cs src/NATS.Server/NatsClient.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamApiProtocolIntegrationTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: route jetstream api requests over pub reply path"

Task 3: Expand API Router to Full Subject Family Dispatcher

Files:

  • Create: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiSubjects.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiRouter.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamApiRouterCoverageTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Theory]
[InlineData("$JS.API.STREAM.UPDATE.ORDERS")]
[InlineData("$JS.API.STREAM.DELETE.ORDERS")]
[InlineData("$JS.API.STREAM.PURGE.ORDERS")]
[InlineData("$JS.API.CONSUMER.DELETE.ORDERS.DUR")]
[InlineData("$JS.API.CONSUMER.MSG.NEXT.ORDERS.DUR")]
public void Router_recognizes_remaining_subject_families(string subject)
{
    var router = new JetStreamApiRouter(new StreamManager(), new ConsumerManager());
    var response = router.Route(subject, "{}"u8);
    response.ShouldNotBeNull();
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamApiRouterCoverageTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL with NotFound for unhandled families.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public static class JetStreamApiSubjects
{
    public const string StreamUpdate = "$JS.API.STREAM.UPDATE.";
    public const string StreamDelete = "$JS.API.STREAM.DELETE.";
    public const string ConsumerDelete = "$JS.API.CONSUMER.DELETE.";
    public const string ConsumerNext = "$JS.API.CONSUMER.MSG.NEXT.";
}
if (subject.StartsWith(JetStreamApiSubjects.StreamUpdate, StringComparison.Ordinal))
    return StreamApiHandlers.HandleUpdate(subject, payload, _streamManager);

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamApiRouterCoverageTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiSubjects.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiRouter.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamApiRouterCoverageTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: expand jetstream api router subject families"

Task 4: Implement Account Info and System-Level API Responses

Files:

  • Create: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/AccountApiHandlers.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiResponse.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiRouter.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamAccountInfoApiTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public void Account_info_returns_jetstream_limits_and_usage_shape()
{
    var router = new JetStreamApiRouter(new StreamManager(), new ConsumerManager());
    var response = router.Route("$JS.API.INFO", "{}"u8);

    response.AccountInfo.ShouldNotBeNull();
    response.Error.ShouldBeNull();
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamAccountInfoApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL because $JS.API.INFO route is missing.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public static JetStreamApiResponse HandleInfo(StreamManager streams, ConsumerManager consumers)
{
    return new JetStreamApiResponse
    {
        AccountInfo = new JetStreamAccountInfo
        {
            Streams = streams.StreamNames.Count,
            Consumers = consumers.ConsumerCount,
        },
    };
}

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamAccountInfoApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/AccountApiHandlers.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiResponse.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiRouter.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamAccountInfoApiTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: add jetstream account info api response"

Task 5: Complete Stream Lifecycle APIs (Update/Delete)

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/StreamApiHandlers.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/StreamManager.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamStreamLifecycleApiTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Stream_update_and_delete_roundtrip()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithStreamAsync("ORDERS", "orders.*");

    var update = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.STREAM.UPDATE.ORDERS", "{\"subjects\":[\"orders.v2.*\"]}");
    update.Error.ShouldBeNull();

    var delete = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.STREAM.DELETE.ORDERS", "{}");
    delete.Success.ShouldBeTrue();
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamStreamLifecycleApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL due to unimplemented update/delete handlers.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public JetStreamApiResponse Delete(string name)
{
    return _streams.TryRemove(name, out _) ? JetStreamApiResponse.SuccessResponse() : JetStreamApiResponse.NotFound($"$JS.API.STREAM.DELETE.{name}");
}
if (subject.StartsWith(JetStreamApiSubjects.StreamDelete, StringComparison.Ordinal))
    return StreamApiHandlers.HandleDelete(subject, _streamManager);

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamStreamLifecycleApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/StreamApiHandlers.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/StreamManager.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamStreamLifecycleApiTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: implement jetstream stream update and delete apis"

Task 6: Implement Stream Names/List APIs

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/StreamApiHandlers.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiResponse.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamStreamListApiTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Stream_names_and_list_return_created_streams()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithStreamAsync("ORDERS", "orders.*");
    _ = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.STREAM.CREATE.INVOICES", "{\"subjects\":[\"invoices.*\"]}");

    var names = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.STREAM.NAMES", "{}");
    names.StreamNames.ShouldContain("ORDERS");
    names.StreamNames.ShouldContain("INVOICES");
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamStreamListApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL because list/names endpoints are missing.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public JetStreamApiResponse ListNames()
    => new() { StreamNames = [.. _streams.Keys.OrderBy(x => x, StringComparer.Ordinal)] };

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamStreamListApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/StreamApiHandlers.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiResponse.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamStreamListApiTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: add jetstream stream names and list apis"

Task 7: Implement Stream Purge and Message Delete/Get APIs

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/StreamApiHandlers.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/IStreamStore.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/MemStore.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/FileStore.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamStreamMessageApiTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Stream_msg_get_delete_and_purge_change_state()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithStreamAsync("ORDERS", "orders.*");
    var ack = await fx.PublishAndGetAckAsync("orders.created", "1");

    var get = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.STREAM.MSG.GET.ORDERS", $"{{\"seq\":{ack.Seq}}}");
    get.StreamMessage.ShouldNotBeNull();

    var del = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.STREAM.MSG.DELETE.ORDERS", $"{{\"seq\":{ack.Seq}}}");
    del.Success.ShouldBeTrue();

    var purge = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.STREAM.PURGE.ORDERS", "{}");
    purge.Success.ShouldBeTrue();
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamStreamMessageApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL due to missing store operations and handlers.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public interface IStreamStore
{
    ValueTask<bool> RemoveAsync(ulong sequence, CancellationToken ct);
    ValueTask<IReadOnlyList<ulong>> PurgeAsync(CancellationToken ct);
}
public JetStreamApiResponse DeleteMessage(string stream, ulong seq)
    => _streamManager.DeleteMessage(stream, seq) ? JetStreamApiResponse.SuccessResponse() : JetStreamApiResponse.ErrorResponse(404, "message not found");

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamStreamMessageApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/StreamApiHandlers.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/IStreamStore.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/MemStore.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/FileStore.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamStreamMessageApiTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: add stream purge and message get delete apis"

Task 8: Implement Direct Message Get APIs

Files:

  • Create: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/DirectApiHandlers.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiRouter.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamDirectGetApiTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Direct_get_returns_message_without_stream_info_wrapper()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithStreamAsync("ORDERS", "orders.*");
    var ack = await fx.PublishAndGetAckAsync("orders.created", "1");

    var direct = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.DIRECT.GET.ORDERS", $"{{\"seq\":{ack.Seq}}}");
    direct.DirectMessage.ShouldNotBeNull();
    direct.DirectMessage!.Payload.ShouldBe("1");
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamDirectGetApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL because direct get route does not exist.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

if (subject.StartsWith("$JS.API.DIRECT.GET.", StringComparison.Ordinal))
    return DirectApiHandlers.HandleGet(subject, payload, _streamManager);

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamDirectGetApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/DirectApiHandlers.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiRouter.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamDirectGetApiTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: add jetstream direct get api"

Task 9: Implement Stream Snapshot/Restore API Skeleton with Store Hooks

Files:

  • Create: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Snapshots/StreamSnapshotService.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/StreamApiHandlers.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/IStreamStore.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamSnapshotRestoreApiTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Snapshot_then_restore_reconstructs_messages()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithStreamAsync("ORDERS", "orders.*");
    _ = await fx.PublishAndGetAckAsync("orders.created", "1");

    var snap = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.STREAM.SNAPSHOT.ORDERS", "{}");
    snap.Snapshot.ShouldNotBeNull();

    var restore = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.STREAM.RESTORE.ORDERS", snap.Snapshot!.Payload);
    restore.Success.ShouldBeTrue();
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamSnapshotRestoreApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL due to missing snapshot/restore handlers and store contracts.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public interface IStreamStore
{
    ValueTask<byte[]> CreateSnapshotAsync(CancellationToken ct);
    ValueTask RestoreSnapshotAsync(ReadOnlyMemory<byte> snapshot, CancellationToken ct);
}
public sealed class StreamSnapshotService
{
    public ValueTask<byte[]> SnapshotAsync(StreamHandle stream, CancellationToken ct) => stream.Store.CreateSnapshotAsync(ct);
}

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamSnapshotRestoreApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Snapshots/StreamSnapshotService.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/StreamApiHandlers.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/IStreamStore.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamSnapshotRestoreApiTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: add stream snapshot restore api skeleton"

Task 10: Complete Consumer API Families (List/Names/Delete)

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/ConsumerApiHandlers.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/ConsumerManager.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiResponse.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamConsumerListApiTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Consumer_names_list_and_delete_are_supported()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithPullConsumerAsync();

    var names = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.CONSUMER.NAMES.ORDERS", "{}");
    names.ConsumerNames.ShouldContain("PULL");

    var del = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.CONSUMER.DELETE.ORDERS.PULL", "{}");
    del.Success.ShouldBeTrue();
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamConsumerListApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL because list/delete handlers are absent.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public IReadOnlyList<string> ListNames(string stream)
    => _consumers.Keys.Where(k => k.Stream == stream).Select(k => k.Name).OrderBy(x => x, StringComparer.Ordinal).ToArray();

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamConsumerListApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/ConsumerApiHandlers.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/ConsumerManager.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiResponse.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamConsumerListApiTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: add consumer names list and delete apis"

Task 11: Implement Consumer Control APIs (Pause/Reset/Unpin)

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/ConsumerApiHandlers.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/ConsumerManager.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamConsumerControlApiTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Consumer_pause_reset_unpin_mutate_state()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithPullConsumerAsync();

    (await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.CONSUMER.PAUSE.ORDERS.PULL", "{\"pause\":true}")).Success.ShouldBeTrue();
    (await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.CONSUMER.RESET.ORDERS.PULL", "{}")).Success.ShouldBeTrue();
    (await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.CONSUMER.UNPIN.ORDERS.PULL", "{}")).Success.ShouldBeTrue();
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamConsumerControlApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL due to missing control handlers.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public bool Pause(string stream, string durable, bool paused)
{
    if (!TryGet(stream, durable, out var c)) return false;
    c.Paused = paused;
    return true;
}

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamConsumerControlApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/ConsumerApiHandlers.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/ConsumerManager.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamConsumerControlApiTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: implement consumer pause reset unpin apis"

Task 12: Implement Consumer MSG.NEXT API Contract

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/ConsumerApiHandlers.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Consumers/PullConsumerEngine.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamConsumerNextApiTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Consumer_msg_next_respects_batch_request()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithPullConsumerAsync();
    _ = await fx.PublishAndGetAckAsync("orders.created", "1");

    var next = await fx.RequestLocalAsync("$JS.API.CONSUMER.MSG.NEXT.ORDERS.PULL", "{\"batch\":1}");
    next.PullBatch.ShouldNotBeNull();
    next.PullBatch!.Messages.Count.ShouldBe(1);
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamConsumerNextApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL because MSG.NEXT route is unimplemented.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

if (subject.StartsWith("$JS.API.CONSUMER.MSG.NEXT.", StringComparison.Ordinal))
    return ConsumerApiHandlers.HandleNext(subject, payload, _consumerManager, _streamManager);

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamConsumerNextApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/ConsumerApiHandlers.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Consumers/PullConsumerEngine.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamConsumerNextApiTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: add consumer msg next api contract"

Task 13: Expand Stream/Consumer Policy Models and Validation

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Models/StreamConfig.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Models/ConsumerConfig.cs
  • Create: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Models/JetStreamPolicies.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Validation/JetStreamConfigValidator.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamPolicyValidationTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public void Validator_rejects_invalid_policy_combinations()
{
    var cfg = new StreamConfig
    {
        Name = "S",
        Subjects = ["s.*"],
        Retention = RetentionPolicy.WorkQueue,
        MaxConsumers = 0,
    };

    var result = JetStreamConfigValidator.Validate(cfg);
    result.IsValid.ShouldBeFalse();
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamPolicyValidationTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL due to missing policy types/validation branches.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public enum RetentionPolicy { Limits, Interest, WorkQueue }
public enum DiscardPolicy { Old, New }
public enum DeliverPolicy { All, Last, New, ByStartSequence, ByStartTime, LastPerSubject }
public enum ReplayPolicy { Instant, Original }
if (config.Retention == RetentionPolicy.WorkQueue && config.MaxConsumers == 0)
    return ValidationResult.Invalid("workqueue retention requires max consumers > 0");

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamPolicyValidationTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Models/StreamConfig.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Models/ConsumerConfig.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Models/JetStreamPolicies.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Validation/JetStreamConfigValidator.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamPolicyValidationTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: add jetstream policy models and validation"

Task 14: Add Expected-Header Preconditions and Dedupe Window Semantics

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Publish/PublishPreconditions.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Publish/JetStreamPublisher.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamExpectedHeaderTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Expected_last_sequence_mismatch_returns_error()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithStreamAsync("ORDERS", "orders.*");
    _ = await fx.PublishAndGetAckAsync("orders.created", "1");

    var ack = await fx.PublishWithExpectedLastSeqAsync("orders.created", "2", expectedLastSeq: 999);
    ack.ErrorCode.ShouldBe(10071);
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamExpectedHeaderTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL because expected-sequence checks are absent.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public bool CheckExpectedLastSeq(ulong expectedLastSeq, ulong actualLastSeq)
    => expectedLastSeq == 0 || expectedLastSeq == actualLastSeq;
if (!_preconditions.CheckExpectedLastSeq(options.ExpectedLastSeq, state.LastSeq))
{
    ack = new PubAck { ErrorCode = 10071 };
    return true;
}

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamExpectedHeaderTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Publish/PublishPreconditions.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Publish/JetStreamPublisher.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamExpectedHeaderTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: add publish expected header preconditions"

Task 15: Complete Pull Consumer Semantics (no_wait, expires, max_waiting)

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Consumers/PullConsumerEngine.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/ConsumerManager.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamPullConsumerContractTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Pull_fetch_no_wait_returns_immediately_when_empty()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithPullConsumerAsync();

    var batch = await fx.FetchWithNoWaitAsync("ORDERS", "PULL", batch: 1);
    batch.Messages.Count.ShouldBe(0);
    batch.TimedOut.ShouldBeFalse();
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamPullConsumerContractTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL because fetch options contract is incomplete.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public ValueTask<PullFetchBatch> FetchAsync(StreamHandle stream, ConsumerHandle consumer, PullFetchRequest request, CancellationToken ct)
{
    if (request.NoWait && consumer.Pending.Count == 0)
        return ValueTask.FromResult(new PullFetchBatch([], timedOut: false));
    // existing fetch logic...
}

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamPullConsumerContractTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Consumers/PullConsumerEngine.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/ConsumerManager.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamPullConsumerContractTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: implement pull consumer no-wait expires max-waiting"

Task 16: Complete Push Consumer Flow Control and Ack Variants

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Consumers/PushConsumerEngine.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Consumers/AckProcessor.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Models/ConsumerConfig.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamPushConsumerContractTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Ack_all_advances_floor_and_clears_pending_before_sequence()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithAckAllConsumerAsync();
    await fx.PublishManyAsync("orders.created", ["1", "2", "3"]);

    var first = await fx.FetchAsync("ORDERS", "ACKALL", 3);
    await fx.AckAllAsync("ORDERS", "ACKALL", first.Messages.Last().Sequence);

    var pending = await fx.GetPendingCountAsync("ORDERS", "ACKALL");
    pending.ShouldBe(0);
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamPushConsumerContractTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL due to incomplete ack-policy handling.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public void AckAll(ulong sequence)
{
    foreach (var key in _pending.Keys.Where(k => k <= sequence).ToArray())
        _pending.Remove(key);
}

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamPushConsumerContractTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Consumers/PushConsumerEngine.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Consumers/AckProcessor.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Models/ConsumerConfig.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamPushConsumerContractTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: implement push flow-control and ack policy variants"

Task 17: Extend MemStore/FileStore Indexing for Subject and Sequence Queries

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/IStreamStore.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/MemStore.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/FileStore.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamStoreIndexTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Store_can_get_last_message_by_subject()
{
    var store = new MemStore();
    await store.AppendAsync("orders.created", "1"u8.ToArray(), default);
    await store.AppendAsync("orders.updated", "2"u8.ToArray(), default);
    await store.AppendAsync("orders.created", "3"u8.ToArray(), default);

    var last = await store.LoadLastBySubjectAsync("orders.created", default);
    last!.Payload.Span.SequenceEqual("3"u8).ShouldBeTrue();
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamStoreIndexTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL due to missing subject index operations.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public ValueTask<StoredMessage?> LoadLastBySubjectAsync(string subject, CancellationToken ct)
{
    lock (_gate)
    {
        var match = _messages.Values.Where(m => m.Subject == subject).OrderByDescending(m => m.Sequence).FirstOrDefault();
        return ValueTask.FromResult(match);
    }
}

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamStoreIndexTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/IStreamStore.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/MemStore.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Storage/FileStore.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamStoreIndexTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: add stream store subject and sequence indexes"

Task 18: Upgrade RAFT Safety Rules and Commit Semantics

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/Raft/RaftNode.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/Raft/RaftReplicator.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/Raft/RaftLog.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/RaftSafetyContractTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Follower_rejects_stale_term_vote_and_append()
{
    var node = new RaftNode("n1");
    node.StartElection(clusterSize: 1);

    var staleVote = node.GrantVote(term: node.Term - 1);
    staleVote.Granted.ShouldBeFalse();

    await Should.ThrowAsync<InvalidOperationException>(async () =>
        await node.TryAppendFromLeaderAsync(new RaftLogEntry(1, node.Term - 1, "cmd"), default));
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~RaftSafetyContractTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL because stale-term safety checks are incomplete.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public VoteResponse GrantVote(int term)
{
    if (term < TermState.CurrentTerm)
        return new VoteResponse { Granted = false };
    // existing logic...
}
if (entry.Term < TermState.CurrentTerm)
    throw new InvalidOperationException("stale term append rejected");

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~RaftSafetyContractTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/Raft/RaftNode.cs src/NATS.Server/Raft/RaftReplicator.cs src/NATS.Server/Raft/RaftLog.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/RaftSafetyContractTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: harden raft safety and term commit semantics"

Task 19: Implement Remaining JetStream Cluster Control APIs

Files:

  • Create: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/ClusterControlApiHandlers.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Cluster/JetStreamMetaGroup.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Cluster/StreamReplicaGroup.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiRouter.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamClusterControlApiTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Stream_leader_stepdown_and_meta_stepdown_endpoints_return_success_shape()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamClusterFixture.StartAsync(nodes: 3);

    var streamStepdown = await fx.RequestAsync("$JS.API.STREAM.LEADER.STEPDOWN.ORDERS", "{}");
    streamStepdown.Success.ShouldBeTrue();

    var metaStepdown = await fx.RequestAsync("$JS.API.META.LEADER.STEPDOWN", "{}");
    metaStepdown.Success.ShouldBeTrue();
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamClusterControlApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL because control endpoints are missing.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public static JetStreamApiResponse HandleMetaLeaderStepdown(JetStreamMetaGroup meta)
{
    meta.StepDown();
    return JetStreamApiResponse.SuccessResponse();
}
if (subject.Equals("$JS.API.META.LEADER.STEPDOWN", StringComparison.Ordinal))
    return ClusterControlApiHandlers.HandleMetaLeaderStepdown(_metaGroup);

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamClusterControlApiTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/Handlers/ClusterControlApiHandlers.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Cluster/JetStreamMetaGroup.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Cluster/StreamReplicaGroup.cs src/NATS.Server/JetStream/Api/JetStreamApiRouter.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamClusterControlApiTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: add remaining jetstream cluster control apis"

Task 20: Expand /jsz and JetStream varz Runtime Detail Fields

Files:

  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/Monitoring/JszHandler.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/Monitoring/Varz.cs
  • Modify: src/NATS.Server/Monitoring/VarzHandler.cs
  • Test: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamMonitoringParityTests.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Fact]
public async Task Jsz_and_varz_include_expanded_runtime_fields()
{
    await using var fx = await JetStreamApiFixture.StartWithPullConsumerAsync();

    var jsz = await fx.GetJszAsync();
    jsz.Streams.ShouldBeGreaterThanOrEqualTo(1);
    jsz.Consumers.ShouldBeGreaterThanOrEqualTo(1);
    jsz.ApiTotal.ShouldBeGreaterThanOrEqualTo(0);
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamMonitoringParityTests" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL with missing runtime fields.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public sealed class JszResponse
{
    public ulong ApiTotal { get; set; }
    public ulong ApiErrors { get; set; }
}
ApiTotal = _server.Stats.JetStreamApiTotal,
ApiErrors = _server.Stats.JetStreamApiErrors,

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamMonitoringParityTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add src/NATS.Server/Monitoring/JszHandler.cs src/NATS.Server/Monitoring/Varz.cs src/NATS.Server/Monitoring/VarzHandler.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamMonitoringParityTests.cs
git commit -m "feat: expand jetstream jsz and varz runtime details"

Task 21: Replace Stub Integration Matrix with Real End-to-End Scenarios

Files:

  • Modify: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamIntegrationMatrixTests.cs
  • Create: tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamIntegrationMatrix.cs

Step 1: Write the failing test

[Theory]
[InlineData("stream-msg-delete-roundtrip")]
[InlineData("consumer-msg-next-no-wait")]
[InlineData("direct-get-by-sequence")]
public async Task Integration_matrix_executes_real_server_scenarios(string scenario)
{
    var result = await JetStreamIntegrationMatrix.RunScenarioAsync(scenario);
    result.Success.ShouldBeTrue(result.Details);
}

Step 2: Run test to verify it fails

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~Integration_matrix_executes_real_server_scenarios" -v minimal
Expected: FAIL because current matrix is stubbed.

Step 3: Write minimal implementation

public static async Task<(bool Success, string Details)> RunScenarioAsync(string scenario)
{
    return scenario switch
    {
        "stream-msg-delete-roundtrip" => await ScenarioRunner.StreamMsgDeleteRoundtripAsync(),
        "consumer-msg-next-no-wait" => await ScenarioRunner.ConsumerNextNoWaitAsync(),
        "direct-get-by-sequence" => await ScenarioRunner.DirectGetBySequenceAsync(),
        _ => (false, $"unknown scenario: {scenario}"),
    };
}

Step 4: Run test to verify it passes

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStreamIntegrationMatrixTests" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 5: Commit

git add tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamIntegrationMatrixTests.cs tests/NATS.Server.Tests/JetStreamIntegrationMatrix.cs
git commit -m "test: replace jetstream integration matrix stub with real scenarios"

Task 22: Complete Dual-Gate Evidence and Update differences.md

Files:

  • Modify: docs/plans/2026-02-23-jetstream-remaining-parity-map.md
  • Modify: differences.md
  • Create: docs/plans/2026-02-23-jetstream-remaining-parity-verification.md

Step 1: Run targeted .NET JetStream/RAFT/cluster test suite

Run: dotnet test tests/NATS.Server.Tests --filter "FullyQualifiedName~JetStream|FullyQualifiedName~Raft|FullyQualifiedName~Route|FullyQualifiedName~Gateway|FullyQualifiedName~Leaf" -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 2: Run full .NET test suite

Run: dotnet test -v minimal
Expected: PASS.

Step 3: Update parity map with evidence links per feature row

| $JS.API.STREAM.PURGE.* | StreamApiHandlers.HandlePurge | ported | JetStreamStreamMessageApiTests.Stream_msg_get_delete_and_purge_change_state |

Step 4: Update differences.md JetStream gaps to reflect newly ported features

Run: rg -n "JETSTREAM|JetStream|\$JS.API" differences.md
Expected: entries reflect new parity status and any explicit residual deltas.

Step 5: Commit

git add docs/plans/2026-02-23-jetstream-remaining-parity-map.md docs/plans/2026-02-23-jetstream-remaining-parity-verification.md differences.md
git commit -m "docs: finalize remaining jetstream parity evidence and differences"

Dependency Order

  1. Task 1 -> Task 2 -> Task 3 -> Task 4
  2. Task 5 -> Task 6 -> Task 7 -> Task 8 -> Task 9
  3. Task 10 -> Task 11 -> Task 12 -> Task 13 -> Task 14 -> Task 15 -> Task 16
  4. Task 17 -> Task 18 -> Task 19 -> Task 20
  5. Task 21 -> Task 22

Scope Notes for Executor

  • Keep implementation grounded in Go references:
    • golang/nats-server/server/jetstream_api.go
    • golang/nats-server/server/jetstream.go
    • golang/nats-server/server/stream.go
    • golang/nats-server/server/consumer.go
    • golang/nats-server/server/raft.go
    • golang/nats-server/server/memstore.go
    • golang/nats-server/server/filestore.go
  • For each Go feature row added to the parity map, include exact .NET implementation path and proving test name.
  • Do not claim parity completion until Task 22 evidence is complete.