Move 225 JetStream-related test files from NATS.Server.Tests into a dedicated NATS.Server.JetStream.Tests project. This includes root-level JetStream*.cs files, storage test files (FileStore, MemStore, StreamStoreContract), and the full JetStream/ subfolder tree (Api, Cluster, Consumers, MirrorSource, Snapshots, Storage, Streams). Updated all namespaces, added InternalsVisibleTo, registered in the solution file, and added the JETSTREAM_INTEGRATION_MATRIX define.
199 lines
7.6 KiB
C#
199 lines
7.6 KiB
C#
using NATS.Server.JetStream.Consumers;
|
|
using NATS.Server.JetStream.Cluster;
|
|
using Shouldly;
|
|
|
|
namespace NATS.Server.JetStream.Tests.JetStream.Consumers;
|
|
|
|
/// <summary>
|
|
/// Tests for cluster-aware pending pull request tracking in PullConsumerEngine.
|
|
/// Go reference: consumer.go proposeWaitingRequest / waitingRequestsPending — cluster-wide
|
|
/// pending pull request coordination via the consumer RAFT group.
|
|
/// golang/nats-server/server/consumer.go proposeWaitingRequest
|
|
/// </summary>
|
|
public class ClusterPendingRequestTests
|
|
{
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// ProposeWaitingRequest
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void ProposeWaitingRequest_with_quorum_returns_true()
|
|
{
|
|
// Go: consumer.go proposeWaitingRequest — only propose when quorum available.
|
|
var engine = new PullConsumerEngine();
|
|
var group = new RaftGroup
|
|
{
|
|
Name = "test-group",
|
|
Peers = ["peer-1", "peer-2", "peer-3"],
|
|
};
|
|
var request = new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 10, Reply = "reply.test.1" };
|
|
|
|
var result = engine.ProposeWaitingRequest(request, group);
|
|
|
|
result.ShouldBeTrue();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void ProposeWaitingRequest_without_quorum_returns_false()
|
|
{
|
|
// Go: consumer.go proposeWaitingRequest — no quorum (0 peers means quorum = 1, but 0 < 1).
|
|
var engine = new PullConsumerEngine();
|
|
var group = new RaftGroup
|
|
{
|
|
Name = "empty-group",
|
|
Peers = [],
|
|
};
|
|
var request = new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 5, Reply = "reply.noquorum" };
|
|
|
|
var result = engine.ProposeWaitingRequest(request, group);
|
|
|
|
result.ShouldBeFalse();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void ProposeWaitingRequest_registers_in_cluster_pending()
|
|
{
|
|
// Go: consumer.go — after a successful proposal, the request must appear in the
|
|
// cluster pending map so it can be fulfilled or expired.
|
|
var engine = new PullConsumerEngine();
|
|
var group = new RaftGroup
|
|
{
|
|
Name = "test-group",
|
|
Peers = ["peer-1", "peer-2", "peer-3"],
|
|
};
|
|
var request = new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 4, Reply = "reply.reg" };
|
|
|
|
engine.ProposeWaitingRequest(request, group);
|
|
|
|
var pending = engine.GetClusterPendingRequests();
|
|
pending.ShouldContain(r => r.Reply == "reply.reg");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void Multiple_proposals_tracked_independently()
|
|
{
|
|
// Go: consumer.go — each reply subject is an independent pending slot;
|
|
// proposals with different reply subjects must not overwrite each other.
|
|
var engine = new PullConsumerEngine();
|
|
var group = new RaftGroup
|
|
{
|
|
Name = "test-group",
|
|
Peers = ["peer-1", "peer-2", "peer-3"],
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
engine.ProposeWaitingRequest(new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 1, Reply = "reply.A" }, group);
|
|
engine.ProposeWaitingRequest(new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 2, Reply = "reply.B" }, group);
|
|
engine.ProposeWaitingRequest(new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 3, Reply = "reply.C" }, group);
|
|
|
|
engine.ClusterPendingCount.ShouldBe(3);
|
|
var pending = engine.GetClusterPendingRequests();
|
|
pending.ShouldContain(r => r.Reply == "reply.A" && r.Batch == 1);
|
|
pending.ShouldContain(r => r.Reply == "reply.B" && r.Batch == 2);
|
|
pending.ShouldContain(r => r.Reply == "reply.C" && r.Batch == 3);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// ClusterPendingCount
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void ClusterPendingCount_tracks_pending_requests()
|
|
{
|
|
// Go: consumer.go — ClusterPendingCount reflects the current size of the pending map.
|
|
var engine = new PullConsumerEngine();
|
|
engine.ClusterPendingCount.ShouldBe(0);
|
|
|
|
engine.RegisterClusterPending(new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 1, Reply = "r1" });
|
|
engine.RegisterClusterPending(new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 2, Reply = "r2" });
|
|
engine.RegisterClusterPending(new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 3, Reply = "r3" });
|
|
|
|
engine.ClusterPendingCount.ShouldBe(3);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void ClusterPendingCount_decrements_on_remove()
|
|
{
|
|
// Go: consumer.go — removing a request via reply subject decrements the pending count.
|
|
var engine = new PullConsumerEngine();
|
|
engine.RegisterClusterPending(new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 5, Reply = "decrement.reply" });
|
|
engine.ClusterPendingCount.ShouldBe(1);
|
|
|
|
engine.RemoveClusterPending("decrement.reply");
|
|
|
|
engine.ClusterPendingCount.ShouldBe(0);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// RegisterClusterPending
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void RegisterClusterPending_adds_request_by_reply()
|
|
{
|
|
// Go: consumer.go — pending requests are keyed by reply subject for O(1) lookup.
|
|
var engine = new PullConsumerEngine();
|
|
var request = new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 7, Reply = "register.reply.subject" };
|
|
|
|
engine.RegisterClusterPending(request);
|
|
|
|
var retrieved = engine.RemoveClusterPending("register.reply.subject");
|
|
retrieved.ShouldNotBeNull();
|
|
retrieved.Batch.ShouldBe(7);
|
|
retrieved.Reply.ShouldBe("register.reply.subject");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// RemoveClusterPending
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void RemoveClusterPending_returns_and_removes_request()
|
|
{
|
|
// Go: consumer.go — RemoveClusterPending both returns the request and removes it
|
|
// from the map so it is not fulfilled twice.
|
|
var engine = new PullConsumerEngine();
|
|
engine.RegisterClusterPending(new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 3, Reply = "remove.me" });
|
|
|
|
var removed = engine.RemoveClusterPending("remove.me");
|
|
|
|
removed.ShouldNotBeNull();
|
|
removed.Reply.ShouldBe("remove.me");
|
|
engine.ClusterPendingCount.ShouldBe(0);
|
|
// Second removal should return null — the entry is gone.
|
|
engine.RemoveClusterPending("remove.me").ShouldBeNull();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void RemoveClusterPending_returns_null_for_unknown()
|
|
{
|
|
// Go: consumer.go — attempting to remove an unknown reply subject is a no-op.
|
|
var engine = new PullConsumerEngine();
|
|
|
|
var result = engine.RemoveClusterPending("does.not.exist");
|
|
|
|
result.ShouldBeNull();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
// GetClusterPendingRequests
|
|
// ---------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
[Fact]
|
|
public void GetClusterPendingRequests_returns_all_pending()
|
|
{
|
|
// Go: consumer.go — GetClusterPendingRequests is used for expiry sweeps and
|
|
// diagnostics; it must return every currently pending request.
|
|
var engine = new PullConsumerEngine();
|
|
engine.RegisterClusterPending(new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 1, Reply = "bulk.a" });
|
|
engine.RegisterClusterPending(new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 2, Reply = "bulk.b" });
|
|
engine.RegisterClusterPending(new PullWaitingRequest { Batch = 3, Reply = "bulk.c" });
|
|
|
|
var all = engine.GetClusterPendingRequests();
|
|
|
|
all.Count.ShouldBe(3);
|
|
all.Select(r => r.Reply).ShouldContain("bulk.a");
|
|
all.Select(r => r.Reply).ShouldContain("bulk.b");
|
|
all.Select(r => r.Reply).ShouldContain("bulk.c");
|
|
}
|
|
}
|