Both findings surfaced when running the cross-language e2e matrix
(scripts/run-client-e2e-tests.ps1) against the redeployed gateway at
commit 84d36b7. Filed in code-reviews/Server/findings.md and
code-reviews/Client.Dotnet/findings.md and fixed in the same change.
Server-030 (Medium / Error handling): GatewaySession.GetReadyWorkerClient
gated on `_state == Ready && _workerClient.State == Ready` but only
formatted `_state` into the SessionManagerException message. Under load
the gateway-driven `_state` and the worker-driven `WorkerClient.State`
can diverge, producing a self-contradictory diagnostic ("Session ... is
not ready. Current state is Ready."). The Java e2e client hit this on
the 56th item after 55 successful add-items. Rewrote the message to
include both states ("Session state is X; worker state is Y"), added
an XML doc explaining the two-state contract and that this branch is
the fail-fast for a divergence race, and added regression test
SessionManagerTests.InvokeAsync_WhenWorkerNotReadyButSessionReady_DiagnosticIncludesBothStates
that pins both states appear in the message. The deeper race (should
the gateway briefly wait for worker-Ready before failing?) remains
open as a follow-up.
Client.Dotnet-017 (Low / Error handling): stream-events CLI threw
OperationCanceledException as an unhandled exception when the user's
--timeout expired before --max-events was reached. Exit code
-532462766, no aggregate JSON. The other client CLIs (Go, Rust, Python,
Java) exit 0 in this case. Wrapped the `await foreach` in
`catch (OperationCanceledException) when (cancellationToken.IsCancellationRequested)`
so the supplied token's cancellation (--timeout, Ctrl+C, or parent
CTS) becomes graceful completion; the aggregate `{ "events": [...] }`
JSON still runs after the catch. Added regression test
RunAsync_StreamEvents_WhenTimeoutFiresAfterEvents_EmitsCollectedEventsAndExitsZero
backed by a new FakeCliClient.StreamHangAfterEvents hook that yields
the configured events then parks on the cancellation token.
Side cleanup: the GatewayApplicationTests test added under Server-020
was asserting an invariant (`/dashboard/dashboard/X` doesn't exist)
that I broke by reverting Server-020 in 84d36b7. The doubled endpoint
shapes do exist now (MapGroup("/dashboard") prefixing an already
"/dashboard/X" @page directive) but they're harmless — no client
requests `/dashboard/dashboard/X`. Replaced the test with a positive
assertion (`/dashboard/X` routes ARE registered) and rewrote the XML
doc to record the actual contract.
Verified: dotnet test src/MxGateway.Tests passes 480/480, dotnet test
clients/dotnet/MxGateway.Client.Tests passes 77/77, gateway redeployed
at this commit and GET http://localhost:5130/dashboard returns 200.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Joseph Doherty
b794c46bc7