Added MxGateway.Worker.Tests/AlarmClientWmProbeTests.cs as a Skip-gated
runtime probe. Run on the dev rig 2026-05-01 against the live AVEVA
install (Galaxy reachable, no manual alarm fired). Findings:
- RegisterConsumer(hWnd, ...) and Subscribe("\Galaxy!", ...) both
return 0 (success). Calls are valid against the deployed assembly.
- A registered-message-class WM (ID 0xC275 in this OS session) fires
every ~1 second after Subscribe completes. Constant wParam=0x1100,
constant lParam=0x079E46D8 — looks like a heartbeat / keepalive,
not a per-change notification.
- Critically, this WM is delivered to AVEVA's own internal window
(hwnd=0x18032E), NOT to the consumer hWnd we registered. The
consumer window receives only the standard WM_CREATE / WM_DESTROY
sequence; no AVEVA traffic in between.
This invalidates the WM_APP-pump design previously documented. The
hWnd parameter to RegisterConsumer appears to be a registration
identity only — AVEVA's notification path runs entirely against
AVEVA's own internal window.
Two viable A.2 designs replace the previous one:
1. Polling. Call GetStatistics on a 500ms timer in the worker's STA
and react to whatever change set it reports. No window plumbing
needed. Latency floor = poll period. Matches AVEVA's own
internal heartbeat cadence.
2. Hook AVEVA's internal window. Discover AVEVA's own hwnd,
SetWindowSubclass on it, intercept WM 0xC275 on AVEVA's thread.
Higher fidelity, lower latency, but invasive and fragile across
AVEVA upgrades — likely a non-starter.
Recommendation in docs/AlarmClientDiscovery.md is option 1 (polling)
unless a follow-up probe with a real fired alarm shows AVEVA does
post change-specific WMs to a different hWnd.
Open follow-up probes documented:
- Fire a real Galaxy alarm during pump and check whether WM 0xC275
cadence changes or GetStatistics returns non-empty arrays.
- GetStatistics threading affinity test.
- Hook AVEVA's internal window 0x18032E.
- Decompile aaAlarmManagedClient IL for RegisterConsumer to find
whether WNAL_Register's callback surface is wrapped.
Test project changes:
- Added Reference to aaAlarmManagedClient + IAlarmMgrDataProvider
(Private=true so the DLL gets copied into bin for test load).
- Test-suite-wide: 127 real tests still pass; both alarm-related
Skip-gated tests skip cleanly.
Code change to the probe is additive — the worker is unchanged.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
8.3 KiB
aaAlarmManagedClient discovery — public surface, 2026-05-01
Result of running
MxGateway.Worker.Tests.AlarmClientDiscoveryTests.DumpAlarmClientPublicSurface
against the deployed AVEVA assembly:
- File:
C:\Program Files (x86)\ArchestrA\Framework\Bin\ViewAppFramework\Content\MA\aaAlarmManagedClient.dll - Assembly identity:
aaAlarmManagedClient, Version=1.0.7368.41290, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=7ebd82b507d9e10c
Public types
aaAlarmManagedClient.AlarmClient(class)aaAlarmManagedClient.PriorityData(class)
That's the entire exported surface — two types, no interfaces, no delegates.
AlarmClient events
None. The class has no public events at all. The reflection probe's
GetEvents(BindingFlags.Public | Instance | Static) returned an empty
list.
AlarmClient methods (relevant subset)
- Lifecycle:
RegisterConsumer(int hWnd, string szProductName, string szApplicationName, string szVersion, bool bRetainHiddenAlarms) → int,DeregisterConsumer() → int,InitializeConsumer(string szApplicationName) → int,UninitializeConsumer() → int,Dispose(). - Subscription:
Subscribe(string szSubscription, short wFromPri, short wToPri, eQueryType QueryType, eSortFlags SortFlags, eAlarmFilterState FilterMask, eAlarmFilterState FilterSpecification) → int. - Change enumeration (pull on poke):
GetStatistics(out int lPercentQuery, out int lTotalAlarms, out int lActiveAlarms, out int lSuppressedAlarms, out int lSuppressedFilters, out int lNewAlarms, out int lChangesCount, out int[] ChangeCodes, out int[] ChangePos, out int[] hAlarm) → int. - Record fetch:
GetAlarmExtendedRec(int lIndex, out AlarmRecord almRec) → int,GetAlarmExtendedRec2(...),GetHighPriAlarm(out AlarmRecord almRec) → int. - Selection model (used by ack-selected-* family):
DeselectAll,SelectAlaramEntry(short select, int from, int to),SelectByGUID(Guid),SelectAlarmCount(int from, int to). - Acknowledge:
AlarmAckByGUID(Guid alarmGuid, string ackComment, string ackOprName, string ackOprNode, string ackOprDomain, string ackOprFullName) → intis the per-alarm full-fidelity native ack.AlarmAckSelected(string ackComment, string ackOprName, string ackOprNode, string ackOprDomain, string ackOprFullName) → intacks whatever the selection model currently has selected. SeveralAckSelected*Group/Tag/Priority/All/Visible*Alarms_Ex(...)variants exist for bulk ack scoped to a group / tag / priority range. - Suppress / shelve:
SupressSelected*andShelveSelected*families plusDoAlarmShelveAction(...). Out of scope for the v1 alarm path. - Snapshot/filter (
SF*prefix):SFSetSortA / SFSetFilterA / SFCreateSnapshot / SFGetListCount / SFDeleteSnapshot / SFRefreshAlarm / SFGetStatistics. Snapshot-style query API, distinct from the consumer-subscription path. Not currently used.
What this means
The architecture comment on
src/MxGateway.Worker/MxAccess/AlarmClientConsumer.cs (PR A.5) is
wrong against this deployed assembly:
"The AVEVA alarm-manager surface (
IAlarmMgrDataProvider) exposes the events we need as plain .NET events — no Windows message pump required."
There is no managed event surface. AlarmClient.RegisterConsumer
takes an hWnd because WM_APP messaging is the actual notification
mechanism: AVEVA's alarm provider WM_APP-pokes the registered window,
and the consumer is expected to call GetStatistics on each poke to
pull ChangeCodes / ChangePos / hAlarm arrays, then
GetAlarmExtendedRec(pos, …) per index to fetch each changed record.
AlarmClientConsumer.AlarmRecordReceived has no production callers as
a result — RaiseAlarmRecordReceived is internal for tests and
never gets invoked at runtime. Until A.2 lands a WM_APP pump,
MX_EVENT_FAMILY_ON_ALARM_TRANSITION cannot carry events.
Live runtime probe — 2026-05-01
MxGateway.Worker.Tests.AlarmClientWmProbeTests.ProbeAlarmClientWmMessages
is a Skip-gated runtime probe that creates a real message-only
window, calls AlarmClient.RegisterConsumer(hWnd, …) +
Subscribe(@"\Galaxy!", …), and pumps for 20s while logging every
window message that arrives. Run results below — this turned the
"WM_APP pump" design assumption upside down.
RegisterConsumer and Subscribe both returned 0 (success). The
calls are valid against the deployed assembly; no parameter pinning
needed.
A registered-message-class WM (ID 0xC275 in this OS session)
fired every ~1s after Subscribe completed. Constant
wParam = 0x00001100, constant lParam = 0x079E46D8 (looks like a
stable pointer into AVEVA-internal state) for all 20 hits. The
constant payload across hits with no Galaxy alarm being fired
suggests this is a heartbeat/keepalive, not a per-change
notification.
Critically: this WM is delivered to AVEVA's own internal window
(hwnd=0x18032E) — NOT to the consumer's hWnd we passed in. The
consumer window's WndProc received only the standard creation
sequence (WM_GETMINMAXINFO, WM_NCCREATE, WM_NCCALCSIZE,
WM_CREATE) and the destruction sequence (WM_NCDESTROY,
WM_DESTROY, WM_NCCALCSIZE) — nothing in between. AVEVA's
notification path runs entirely against AVEVA's internal window;
it never forwards to the user-supplied hWnd.
The message ID itself is dynamic (a RegisterWindowMessage
allocation in the >= 0xC000 range), so it cannot be hard-coded —
each consumer process must call RegisterWindowMessage with the
correct string and use whatever ID the OS returns.
What this means for A.2
The "WM_APP pump on the user hWnd" design — what the original plan
banner described and what the previous version of this doc
recommended — does not match how AVEVA actually delivers
notifications. The hWnd parameter to RegisterConsumer does not
appear to receive any of AVEVA's alarm traffic; it's likely used
only as a registration identity (and perhaps as a parent for modal
dialogs).
Two viable A.2 designs given the probe data:
- Polling. Just call
GetStatisticson a timer (e.g. every 500ms in the worker's STA) and react to the change set it reports. No window plumbing needed. Trade-off: latency floor = poll period; modest CPU floor because the call is cheap. Matches the heartbeat-style WM 0xC275 semantics — AVEVA itself runs a poll loop internally. - Hook AVEVA's internal window. Discover AVEVA's own window
(
hwnd=0x18032Ein the probe),SetWindowsHookExorSetWindowSubclasson it, and intercept WM 0xC275 on AVEVA's thread. Higher fidelity, near-zero latency, but invasive, fragile across AVEVA upgrades, and requires running on the same process / thread as the AVEVA window. Probably a non-starter without further AVEVA documentation.
Recommendation: the polling path (option 1) is cheaper to
implement, more robust against AVEVA-internal change, and
acceptable for a typical alarm cadence. The worker's existing STA
already provides a thread-affinitized timer surface. The unanswered
question is whether GetStatistics can be safely called outside
AVEVA's own message-pump thread — confirmable by extending the
probe to fire GetStatistics on its own thread and check the
result.
Open follow-up probes
Each can be added to AlarmClientWmProbeTests as a separate
Skip-gated test:
- Fire a real Galaxy alarm during the pump window. Confirms
whether the WM 0xC275 cadence changes (becomes per-change rather
than periodic) and whether
GetStatisticsreturns a non-emptyChangeCodes / ChangePos / hAlarmtriple. - Call
GetStatisticson a different thread from theRegisterConsumerthread to test threading affinity. - Hook AVEVA's internal window to log what WMs it actually processes (would resolve option 2 above).
- Decompile
aaAlarmManagedClient.dll's IL for theRegisterConsumermethod to find whatRegisterWindowMessagestring is used and whether there's a callback-registration surface onWNAL_Registerthat the managed client wraps. The alarmlst.dll strings (WNAL_CallBack, "Invalid callbacks" error) suggest the underlying C API takes callbacks, but the managed wrapper exposes none of them.
PR A.5's Subscribe / AcknowledgeByGuid / SnapshotActiveAlarms
are correct — they're pull-style and don't depend on the
notification mechanism.