Family-wide nav sweep: the Secrets management page should be linked from
each app's UI, visible to Administrator-role users only.
The link already existed in MainLayout's Admin section. The gate did not:
the rail rendered every item for every visitor, including a Viewer and the
anonymous-localhost read-only identity. Not an access hole — the mounted
page carries [Authorize(Policy = "secrets:manage")], so a Viewer clicking
through was denied — but a dead link presented as a live one. There was
also no existing role-gated nav pattern to follow; the rail's only
AuthorizeView was the footer's signed-in/signed-out split.
Gated on the POLICY rather than a role literal, so nav visibility cannot
drift from what the page enforces. In this host the two are equivalent:
GatewayOptionsValidator constrains Dashboard:GroupToRole values to
Administrator or Viewer, so the shared library's other manage-granting
roles (secrets-manager, secrets-reveal) are unreachable. The policy form
stays correct if that ever relaxes, where a role literal would then hide
the link from users who can use the page.
API Keys is deliberately left ungated. It looks like the same case and is
not: ApiKeysPage renders for a Viewer with write affordances hidden, so
hiding its link would remove legitimate read access. The secrets page has
no read-only mode. The rule is "gate the link when the page denies the
role outright", not "gate everything under Admin".
Coverage: three tests pin the policy's verdict per principal
(Administrator admitted, Viewer refused, unauthenticated refused), and
/admin/secrets joins the canonical route list — it is the one nav
destination mounted from an RCL rather than declared here, so a routing
regression could remove it without touching this repo's pages. The
principal helper sets an authentication type deliberately: without one
the role assertions would pass vacuously for the wrong reason.
Not a rendering test — the suite has no component-testing harness, and
adding one to assert a single AuthorizeView would be a large dependency
for a small claim.
Build 0 warnings / 0 errors; suite 895/895.
Family-wide admin-UI cleanup pass (scadaproj admin_ui_cleanup.md) applied to the
Blazor dashboard. Behaviour is unchanged throughout — no @onclick, disabled,
binding, auth gate, or arm->confirm flow was touched.
Uncontrolled error text is now truncated at the render site. Fault messages,
Galaxy load errors, and browse-tree load failures were rendered in full into
fixed-width table cells, where a long exception string blows out the column.
Each site gets DashboardDisplay.Abbreviate plus a title attribute carrying the
untruncated text, so nothing becomes unreachable. Abbreviate is length-checked
rather than a bare range slice: `value[..n]` on a shorter string throws and
takes the whole page render down with it. The two detail views whose entire
purpose is to show one fault in full — SessionDetailsPage and GalaxyPage's
Last Error — are deliberately left untruncated.
Two classes referenced from markup had no definition anywhere in the sheet.
.browse-stale-banner was inert; .tree-load-status was a real visual defect —
loading and failed-to-load rows sit among .tree-row siblings and carry the same
leading .tree-toggle-empty spacer, but that spacer only takes its width as a
flex item, so without a flex container those rows lost their indent.
Confirm/cancel pairs in ConfirmDialog and the API-key create form are now
btn-groups with role="group" and an aria-label, replacing margin-spaced loose
buttons.
Removes a paragraph on GalaxyPage naming internal RPCs (DiscoverHierarchy,
GetLastDeployTime) — implementation detail with no meaning to a dashboard
operator.
Verified in a real browser, not bUnit: full build clean, 879/879 tests, and a
live gate against a running dashboard with a genuine ~250-char SqlClient
exception as the erroring row. Results per check, including the checks that
could NOT be exercised without an x86 worker, are recorded in
docs/plans/2026-08-11-dashboard-ui-sweeps.md.
That plan doc also records a correction: this app is NOT Bootstrap-free. The
sweep brief said it was, citing the scadaproj index; libman.json pins
bootstrap 5.3.3 and App.razor:7 links it ahead of the theme. The stale claim had
already cost this app one skipped family sweep (scadaproj#2, the /admin/secrets
modal), so that modal was live-gated here too and passes.
Joseph Doherty