Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Joseph Doherty 7db4bffa30 bench-read-bulk driver: invoke .NET in -c Release and Rust in --release
Rust''s debug profile costs the bench ~45% of solo throughput and ~3x of
p99 latency vs release (267 vs 184 solo calls/sec, p99 5.7 vs 16ms).
Debug disables inlining, runs overflow checks on every arithmetic op,
keeps Future state machines un-collapsed, and lets every Vec allocation
through unoptimized. Other compiled clients in the matrix don''t see
this gap: Go always builds optimized, Python is interpreted, and the
JIT-tiered runtimes (HotSpot for Java, CoreCLR Tier 1 for .NET) close
most of the gap during the warmup window.

The driver now requests `cargo run --release` for Rust and `dotnet run
-c Release --no-build` for .NET, so the two compiled-AOT clients race
under their production-equivalent profiles. Callers must `cargo build
--release -p mxgw-cli` and `dotnet build ... -c Release` once before
running the bench; `--no-build` then keeps each measurement window
free of compilation overhead.

Live re-run (5-way concurrent, 30s, bulkSize 6) after the switch:
  rust:  145.35 calls/sec (was 123.26 in debug; 18% gain under contention)
  go:    185.59 calls/sec
  java:  171.80 calls/sec
  dotnet:172.31 calls/sec
  python:140.52 calls/sec

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-20 05:25:17 -04:00
Joseph Doherty 93633ce99c Cross-language ReadBulk stress benchmark
Adds a bench-read-bulk subcommand to every client CLI (.NET, Go, Rust,
Python, Java) and a PowerShell driver that runs all five concurrently
against the deployed gateway and prints a side-by-side comparison.

Each CLI''s bench:

  - Opens its own session, registers, subscribes to bulk-size tags so the
    worker''s MxAccessValueCache populates from real OnDataChange events.
  - Runs a warmup-seconds-long pre-loop with identical calls so JIT /
    connection-pool / first-call overhead is amortised before the
    measurement window.
  - Runs ReadBulk in a tight in-process loop for duration-seconds with
    per-call high-resolution latency capture (Stopwatch in .NET,
    time.Now in Go, std::time::Instant in Rust, time.perf_counter in
    Python, System.nanoTime in Java).
  - Unsubscribes + closes the session, then emits one JSON object with
    the shared schema: { language, durationMs, totalCalls, successfulCalls,
    failedCalls, totalReadResults, cachedReadResults, callsPerSecond,
    latencyMs: { p50, p95, p99, max, mean } }.

The PS driver (scripts/bench-read-bulk.ps1) launches one detached process
per client, waits for all to finish, parses the trailing JSON object from
each stdout, prints a comparison table, and persists the combined report
under artifacts/bench/. Quoting around Java''s `gradle --args="..."` is
handled by writing a one-shot .bat that cmd.exe runs; the .NET CLI''s
per-call gRPC timeout is auto-scaled to (Duration + Warmup + 30s) so the
channel-wide timeout doesn''t cancel the bench mid-loop.

Live 30-second steady-state run against the deployed gateway, all five
clients hitting the same six TestMachine_001..006.TestChangingInt tags:

  client    calls/sec  cached/total    p50 ms  p95 ms  p99 ms  max ms
  dotnet      171.78   30924/30924      3.84   14.06   40.41  542.48
  go          175.46   31590/31590      3.93   13.52   41.26  243.00
  rust        123.26   22188/22188      5.52   15.78   48.11  544.41
  python      145.79   26244/26244      4.86   14.85   41.65  645.84
  java        181.12   32604/32604      3.80   10.59   33.37  344.27

143,550 ReadBulk results across all five clients during the 30s window;
100% were was_cached = true (the worker''s cache fast-path never fell
through to the snapshot lifecycle). Aggregate read throughput ~800
calls/sec against five concurrent sessions sharing the same cached tags.

A second variant with bulk-size 20 sustained the same per-client call
rate while delivering 3.3x more values per call (~37,000 cached reads/sec
aggregate across the five concurrent sessions), confirming the linear
per-tag cache lookup inside one call is not a bottleneck at this scale.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-20 05:17:08 -04:00