rename: prefix gateway projects/namespaces with ZB.MOM.WW + sln→slnx

Apply the ZB.MOM.WW. prefix to all gateway-side projects, folders, .csproj/.sln contents, C# namespaces, using directives, generated proto C# (csharp_namespace + checked-in generated files), InternalsVisibleTo attributes, project-name string literals (LoadProject, .sln lookups, worker exe paths, staticwebassets manifest), and the install/script/doc references that point at any of the above. Migrate the solution from .sln to .slnx via `dotnet sln migrate` and delete the old file. External-runtime identifiers are intentionally NOT prefixed so external configuration keeps working: - GatewayMetrics.cs MeterName ("MxGateway.Server") - DashboardAuthenticationDefaults Scheme/Policy ("MxGateway.Dashboard") - GatewayRequestLoggingMiddleware logger category ("MxGateway.Request") - StaRuntime thread name ("MxGateway.Worker.STA") - appsettings.json root section "MxGateway" + env-var prefix MxGateway__... and secret-name MxGateway:ApiKeyPepper - C:\ProgramData\MxGateway\ data dir paths Also fixes two tests that were not rename-related but became visible while validating the rename: - WorkerLiveMxAccessSmokeTests.ShutDownAsync: cancellation that the gateway service correctly maps to RpcException(Cancelled) per gRPC convention was being misclassified as a stream fault. Added a sibling catch on RpcException with StatusCode.Cancelled. - IntegrationTestEnvironment.ResolveRepositoryRoot: extracted IsRepositoryRoot and made it accept either a .git marker OR a .sln/.slnx next to src/ so the worker-exe walker works in non-git working copies. clients/proto/proto-inputs.json's protoRoot updated to point at src/ZB.MOM.WW.MxGateway.Contracts/Protos. Verified by `dotnet build` and a full `dotnet test` of the .slnx with MXGATEWAY_RUN_LIVE_{MXACCESS,LDAP,GALAXY}_TESTS=1: Tests: 472/472 pass Worker.Tests: 280/280 pass (4 dev-rig [Fact(Skip=...)] skipped) IntegrationTests: 18/18 pass Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-23 16:22:23 -04:00
parent 867bf18116
commit dc9c0c950c
491 changed files with 32854 additions and 8414 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+using ZB.MOM.WW.MxGateway.Contracts.Proto;
+using ZB.MOM.WW.MxGateway.Server.Grpc;
+
+namespace ZB.MOM.WW.MxGateway.Tests.Gateway.Grpc;
+
+public sealed class MxAccessGrpcMapperTests
+{
+    /// <summary>Verifies that command mapping clones payloads to isolate them across process boundaries.</summary>
+    [Fact]
+    public void MapCommand_ClonesMethodSpecificPayloadForWorkerBoundary()
+    {
+        MxAccessGrpcMapper mapper = new();
+        MxCommandRequest request = new()
+        {
+            SessionId = "session-1",
+            Command = new MxCommand
+            {
+                Kind = MxCommandKind.Write,
+                Write = new WriteCommand
+                {
+                    ServerHandle = 10,
+                    ItemHandle = 20,
+                    UserId = 30,
+                    Value = new MxValue
+                    {
+                        DataType = MxDataType.String,
+                        StringValue = "value",
+                    },
+                },
+            },
+        };
+
+        WorkerCommand workerCommand = mapper.MapCommand(request);
+        request.Command.Write.Value.StringValue = "changed";
+
+        Assert.Equal(MxCommandKind.Write, workerCommand.Command.Kind);
+        Assert.Equal("value", workerCommand.Command.Write.Value.StringValue);
+        Assert.NotNull(workerCommand.EnqueueTimestamp);
+    }
+
+    /// <summary>Verifies that command reply mapping preserves HRESULT and status information.</summary>
+    [Fact]
+    public void MapCommandReply_PreservesHresultStatusesAndPayload()
+    {
+        const int hresult = unchecked((int)0x80070005);
+        WorkerCommandReply workerReply = new()
+        {
+            Reply = new MxCommandReply
+            {
+                SessionId = "session-1",
+                Kind = MxCommandKind.Register,
+                ProtocolStatus = MxAccessGrpcMapper.Ok(),
+                Hresult = hresult,
+                Register = new RegisterReply { ServerHandle = 50 },
+            },
+        };
+        workerReply.Reply.Statuses.Add(new MxStatusProxy
+        {
+            Success = 0,
+            Category = MxStatusCategory.SecurityError,
+            DiagnosticText = "denied",
+        });
+
+        MxCommandReply publicReply = new MxAccessGrpcMapper().MapCommandReply(workerReply);
+
+        Assert.Equal(hresult, publicReply.Hresult);
+        Assert.Equal(50, publicReply.Register.ServerHandle);
+        Assert.Equal("denied", Assert.Single(publicReply.Statuses).DiagnosticText);
+    }
+
+    /// <summary>Verifies that a missing worker reply returns a protocol violation status.</summary>
+    [Fact]
+    public void MapCommandReply_WhenWorkerReplyMissing_ReturnsProtocolViolationReply()
+    {
+        MxCommandReply publicReply = new MxAccessGrpcMapper().MapCommandReply(new WorkerCommandReply());
+
+        Assert.Equal(ProtocolStatusCode.ProtocolViolation, publicReply.ProtocolStatus.Code);
+    }
+}