fix(CLI-37,CLI-38): make status/HRESULT reply validation conformant across all five clients
One cross-client conformance pass; also closes first-cycle CLI-08. CLI-37: an MxStatusProxy entry is a failure iff `category != MX_STATUS_CATEGORY_OK`. The proto contract has always said so — `success` is the raw 16-bit COM member carried verbatim for diagnostics, not a boolean — but four clients branched on `success` alone and .NET required both, so the same gateway reply produced opposite verdicts per language. An absent entry stays success; a present entry with an UNSPECIFIED category is a failure, because the worker always maps a category and an unmapped one is not proven OK. CLI-38: a reply fails on HRESULT iff `hresult` is present and negative, so positive COM success codes such as S_FALSE (1) pass. .NET/Go/Java used `!= 0`, which errored on a parity-preserving S_FALSE that Python and Rust accepted. This makes the existing ClientLibrariesDesign.md claim true rather than rewriting the doc to describe the divergence. Four shared fixtures pin both rules cross-client, and each language suite also carries a table test for the two edges a fixture cannot express (absent entry, UNSPECIFIED category). A Java test fake that built a status with a bare `setSuccess(1)` and no category is fixed — under the category rule that reply was never a success.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -308,10 +308,12 @@ pub fn ensure_command_success(reply: MxCommandReply) -> Result<MxCommandReply, E
|
||||
/// This is the second reply check applied to the typed command path, after
|
||||
/// [`ensure_command_success`] confirms the protocol envelope is `Ok`. It
|
||||
/// enforces MXAccess parity: a reply can carry an `Ok` protocol envelope while
|
||||
/// MXAccess itself rejected the operation. Following COM semantics (and the
|
||||
/// Python client), only a **negative** `hresult` is a failure — positive codes
|
||||
/// such as `S_FALSE = 1` are success. A `MXSTATUS_PROXY` entry is treated as a
|
||||
/// failure when its `success` member is `0`.
|
||||
/// MXAccess itself rejected the operation. Following COM semantics, only a
|
||||
/// **negative** `hresult` is a failure — positive codes such as `S_FALSE = 1`
|
||||
/// are success. A `MXSTATUS_PROXY` entry is treated as a failure when its
|
||||
/// `category` is not [`MxStatusCategory::Ok`]; the `success` member mirrors the
|
||||
/// raw COM value verbatim for diagnostics and never enters the verdict, so an
|
||||
/// entry with an unspecified category fails even when `success` is non-zero.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Per-item bulk failures are reported inside each result entry
|
||||
/// (`was_successful = false`) rather than in the top-level `hresult`/`statuses`
|
||||
@@ -320,10 +322,14 @@ pub fn ensure_command_success(reply: MxCommandReply) -> Result<MxCommandReply, E
|
||||
/// # Errors
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Returns [`Error::MxAccess`] when `reply.hresult` is negative or any
|
||||
/// `reply.statuses` entry reports a non-success `success` member.
|
||||
/// `reply.statuses` entry reports a category other than
|
||||
/// [`MxStatusCategory::Ok`].
|
||||
pub fn ensure_mxaccess_success(reply: MxCommandReply) -> Result<MxCommandReply, Error> {
|
||||
let hresult_failure = reply.hresult.is_some_and(|hresult| hresult < 0);
|
||||
let status_failure = reply.statuses.iter().any(|status| status.success == 0);
|
||||
let status_failure = reply
|
||||
.statuses
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.any(|status| status.category != MxStatusCategory::Ok as i32);
|
||||
|
||||
if hresult_failure || status_failure {
|
||||
Err(Box::new(MxAccessError::new(reply)).into())
|
||||
@@ -412,8 +418,10 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
let mut reply = ok_reply();
|
||||
// Positive hresult (e.g. S_FALSE = 1) is a success, not a failure.
|
||||
reply.hresult = Some(1);
|
||||
// A zero `success` member with an OK category is still a success: the
|
||||
// category is authoritative and `success` is diagnostics only.
|
||||
reply.statuses = vec![MxStatusProxy {
|
||||
success: 1,
|
||||
success: 0,
|
||||
category: MxStatusCategory::Ok as i32,
|
||||
..MxStatusProxy::default()
|
||||
}];
|
||||
@@ -424,8 +432,9 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
fn ensure_mxaccess_success_flags_failing_status_entry() {
|
||||
let mut reply = ok_reply();
|
||||
// A non-OK category fails even though the raw `success` member is set.
|
||||
reply.statuses = vec![MxStatusProxy {
|
||||
success: 0,
|
||||
success: 1,
|
||||
category: MxStatusCategory::CommunicationError as i32,
|
||||
detail: 42,
|
||||
diagnostic_text: "write rejected for mxgw_visible_secret".to_owned(),
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -282,7 +282,11 @@ impl MxStatus {
|
||||
&self.raw
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// `MXSTATUS_PROXY.Success` flag (0 = error, non-zero = good/warning).
|
||||
/// Raw `MXSTATUS_PROXY.Success` member, carried verbatim from COM.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// This is a diagnostic value, not a verdict: the wire contract makes
|
||||
/// [`Self::category`] authoritative, and `ensure_mxaccess_success` branches
|
||||
/// on the category alone.
|
||||
pub fn success(&self) -> i32 {
|
||||
self.raw.success
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user