dohertj2/mxaccessgw
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Harden code-review tooling and align REVIEW-PROCESS.md with mxaccessgw

Browse Source 
- regen-readme.py: use `python` not the broken `python3` Store alias in
  the generated note and docstring; --check now also fails when a module
  header's "Open findings" count disagrees with finding statuses or a
  finding has an unrecognised Status (find_inconsistencies)
- REVIEW-PROCESS.md: rewritten for mxaccessgw (was describing ScadaLink)
  — MxGateway.* modules, "mxaccessgw conventions" checklist category,
  gateway.md/docs/ design context, `python` command
- scripts/check-code-reviews-readme.ps1: CI/pre-commit wrapper for
  regen-readme.py --check
- code-reviews/test_regen_readme.py: dependency-free parser tests
- code-reviews/README.md: regenerated

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Joseph Doherty
2026-05-18 16:36:25 -04:00
parent ae164ea34f
commit 3cc53a8c69
5 changed files with 308 additions and 66 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
code-reviews/README.md
+1 -1
View File
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Code Reviews
<!-- GENERATED FILE - do not edit by hand. Regenerate with: python3 code-reviews/regen-readme.py -->
<!-- GENERATED FILE - do not edit by hand. Regenerate with: python code-reviews/regen-readme.py -->
Cross-module code review index for the `mxaccessgw` codebase. The review process is defined in [../REVIEW-PROCESS.md](../REVIEW-PROCESS.md).