Joseph Doherty
161b0cedfa
rust / build / test / clippy / fmt (push) Has been cancelled
Closes F10 and F11 per option (b) of each followup's resolve
criterion: hand-rolled body codecs derived from the [MS-DCOM]
spec, ship structurally with no live fixture (the .NET reference
doesn't call these opnums), validate against captured frames when
they become available.
F10 — IObjectExporter::ResolveOxid2 (opnum 4):
Per [MS-DCOM] §3.1.2.5.1.4. New parse_resolve_oxid2_result
mirrors parse_resolve_oxid_result exactly except for the extra
4-byte COMVERSION slot (u16 major + u16 minor) between
authn_hint and error_status. Trailing-fields check tightens
from 24 bytes (opnum 0) to 28 bytes (opnum 4). New ComVersion +
ResolveOxid2Result types. referent_id=0 short-circuit returns
empty bindings + default ComVersion + tail-status, matching
opnum 0's pattern.
F11 — IRemUnknown::RemAddRef + RemRelease (opnums 4 and 5):
Per [MS-DCOM] §3.1.1.5.6 + §2.2.19 (REMINTERFACEREF). Both
opnums share the wire shape, so:
- encode_rem_add_ref_request + encode_rem_release_request
both delegate to a shared encode_remref_array_request
helper.
- parse_remref_response is shared between them too — they
have an identical OrpcThat + referent_id + max_count +
N×HRESULT + error_code layout.
New RemInterfaceRef struct (ipid + public_refs + private_refs,
ENCODED_LEN = 24) + RemRefResponse decoded shape.
8 new structural tests across both modules pin every documented
edge of each shape — short stubs, referent-zero short-circuits,
truncated-trailing detection, full multi-element round-trips.
mxaccess-rpc 183 → 188 tests; default-feature clippy clean.
Both followups documented "**Status:** Awaiting wire-fixture
capture" prior to this commit; the structural-port option was
explicitly listed as resolution path (b) in each. Future captured
frames will validate the byte-by-byte match — until then the
port is byte-faithful to the spec but unverified against a live
peer (which is fine for shipping since neither opnum is on the
NMX session's hot path).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
design/ — Rust port architectural plan
This folder is the design contract for the Rust replacement of AVEVA/Wonderware MXAccess. It is the gap between the .NET reference in src/ and the Rust crates that will be written under a sibling rust/ workspace (per CLAUDE.md).
The folder is structured as a small set of focused documents. Read in order; each builds on the previous.
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
00-overview.md |
Mission, two-layer goal, architectural principles, non-goals |
10-raw-layer.md |
Byte-accurate raw MXAccess layer (codec + transport + session) |
20-async-layer.md |
Idiomatic Tokio async layer on top of the raw layer |
30-crate-topology.md |
Cargo workspace, crates, dependencies, build/test commands |
40-protocol-invariants.md |
Bill of materials: IIDs, opnums, envelope/handle bytes |
50-error-model.md |
MxStatus, error types, panic/cancellation policy |
60-roadmap.md |
Milestones M0..M6, validation strategy |
70-risks-and-open-questions.md |
Parity gaps, unproven flows, cross-platform constraints |
dependencies.md |
Cross- and within-milestone parallelism map; agent budget per phase |
review.md |
Adversarial review log (BLOCKER/MAJOR/MINOR/NIT findings, all resolved) |
prompt.md |
/loop driver prompt for autonomous M2–M6 execution |
followups.md |
Open / resolved deferred work items; auto-triaged by prompt.md Step 0 (created on first /loop run if missing) |
The design is grounded in the .NET reference at src/ and the protocol artifacts in docs/, analysis/, and captures/. Do not introduce protocol behavior in these documents that is not already proven in the reference. When adding a new claim about wire format, cite either:
- a
.csfile path insrc/MxNativeCodec/,src/MxNativeClient/, orsrc/MxAsbClient/, or - a
docs/*.mdspec file, or - a
captures/0NN-frida-*directory oranalysis/frida/*.tsvrow.
This folder is documentation, not code. When the Rust workspace is created, the design here is the contract it must satisfy. When evidence in captures/ invalidates a design decision here, update the design first, then the code.
Reading order
- New contributor: 00 → 30 → 10 → 40 → 20 → 50 → 60 → 70.
- Protocol question: 40 first, then the relevant section of 10.
- API question: 20 first, then 50.
- Planning a milestone: 60 first, cross-reference 70 for blockers.
- Scheduling concurrent work:
dependencies.mdfor the per-phase parallelism map. - Driving M2–M6 autonomously via
/loop:prompt.md(and thefollowups.mdtriage log it maintains).