Files
lmxopcua/tests/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Configuration.Tests/DraftValidatorTests.cs
T
Joseph Doherty 32d7fd7cc9
v2-ci / build (push) Failing after 48s
v2-ci / unit-tests (tests/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Cluster.Tests) (push) Has been skipped
v2-ci / unit-tests (tests/Server/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.ControlPlane.Tests) (push) Has been skipped
v2-ci / unit-tests (tests/Server/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.OpcUaServer.Tests) (push) Has been skipped
v2-ci / unit-tests (tests/Server/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Runtime.Tests) (push) Has been skipped
v2-ci / unit-tests (tests/Server/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Security.Tests) (push) Has been skipped
v2-ci / integration (tests/Server/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Host.IntegrationTests) (push) Has been skipped
v2-ci / integration (tests/Server/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.OpcUaServer.IntegrationTests) (push) Has been skipped
fix(galaxy): complete PR 7.2 rename — use canonical GalaxyMxGateway driver type
The driver/factory/seed use 'GalaxyMxGateway' (legacy 'Galaxy' was retired),
but the AdminUI editor router, GalaxyDriverPage, address picker, identity
dropdown, the Galaxy browser/probe, and DraftValidator still keyed on 'Galaxy'.
Result: the seeded GalaxyMxGateway driver couldn't be edited ('no editor
registered'), UI-created Galaxy drivers wrote a type with no factory, and a
SystemPlatform-bound GalaxyMxGateway driver failed publish validation.
Align all stragglers to GalaxyMxGateway (+ failing-test-first DraftValidator
coverage). ShouldStub's 'Galaxy' legacy safety-net left intact.
2026-05-29 12:31:55 -04:00

361 lines
16 KiB
C#

using Shouldly;
using Xunit;
using ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Configuration.Entities;
using ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Configuration.Enums;
using ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Configuration.Validation;
namespace ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Configuration.Tests;
[Trait("Category", "Unit")]
public sealed class DraftValidatorTests
{
/// <summary>Verifies that UnsSegment validation rejects uppercase and special characters.</summary>
/// <param name="name">The segment name to validate.</param>
/// <param name="shouldPass">Whether the validation should pass for this name.</param>
[Theory]
[InlineData("valid-name", true)]
[InlineData("line-01", true)]
[InlineData("_default", true)]
[InlineData("UPPER", false)]
[InlineData("with space", false)]
[InlineData("", false)]
public void UnsSegment_rule_accepts_lowercase_or_default_only(string name, bool shouldPass)
{
var uuid = Guid.NewGuid();
var draft = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 1, ClusterId = "c",
Equipment =
[
new Equipment
{
EquipmentUuid = uuid,
EquipmentId = DraftValidator.DeriveEquipmentId(uuid),
Name = name,
DriverInstanceId = "d",
UnsLineId = "line-a",
MachineCode = "m",
},
],
};
var errors = DraftValidator.Validate(draft);
var hasUnsError = errors.Any(e => e.Code == "UnsSegmentInvalid");
hasUnsError.ShouldBe(!shouldPass);
}
/// <summary>Verifies that namespace cannot be bound to a different cluster.</summary>
[Fact]
public void Cross_cluster_namespace_binding_is_rejected()
{
var draft = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 1, ClusterId = "c-A",
Namespaces = [new Namespace { NamespaceId = "ns-1", ClusterId = "c-B", NamespaceUri = "urn:x", Kind = NamespaceKind.Equipment }],
DriverInstances = [new DriverInstance { DriverInstanceId = "d-1", ClusterId = "c-A", NamespaceId = "ns-1", Name = "drv", DriverType = "ModbusTcp", DriverConfig = "{}" }],
};
var errors = DraftValidator.Validate(draft);
errors.ShouldContain(e => e.Code == "BadCrossClusterNamespaceBinding");
}
/// <summary>Verifies that namespace in the same cluster is accepted.</summary>
[Fact]
public void Same_cluster_namespace_binding_is_accepted()
{
var draft = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 1, ClusterId = "c-A",
Namespaces = [new Namespace { NamespaceId = "ns-1", ClusterId = "c-A", NamespaceUri = "urn:x", Kind = NamespaceKind.Equipment }],
DriverInstances = [new DriverInstance { DriverInstanceId = "d-1", ClusterId = "c-A", NamespaceId = "ns-1", Name = "drv", DriverType = "ModbusTcp", DriverConfig = "{}" }],
};
DraftValidator.Validate(draft).ShouldNotContain(e => e.Code == "BadCrossClusterNamespaceBinding");
}
/// <summary>Verifies that equipment UUID must remain immutable across generations.</summary>
[Fact]
public void EquipmentUuid_change_across_generations_is_rejected()
{
var oldUuid = Guid.Parse("11111111-1111-1111-1111-111111111111");
var newUuid = Guid.Parse("22222222-2222-2222-2222-222222222222");
var eid = DraftValidator.DeriveEquipmentId(oldUuid);
var draft = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 2, ClusterId = "c",
Equipment = [new Equipment { EquipmentUuid = newUuid, EquipmentId = eid, Name = "eq", DriverInstanceId = "d", UnsLineId = "line-a", MachineCode = "m" }],
PriorEquipment = [new Equipment { EquipmentUuid = oldUuid, EquipmentId = eid, Name = "eq", DriverInstanceId = "d", UnsLineId = "line-a", MachineCode = "m" }],
};
DraftValidator.Validate(draft).ShouldContain(e => e.Code == "EquipmentUuidImmutable");
}
/// <summary>Verifies that a ZTag cannot be reserved by a different equipment UUID.</summary>
[Fact]
public void ZTag_reserved_by_different_uuid_is_rejected()
{
var uuid = Guid.NewGuid();
var otherUuid = Guid.NewGuid();
var draft = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 1, ClusterId = "c",
Equipment = [new Equipment { EquipmentUuid = uuid, EquipmentId = DraftValidator.DeriveEquipmentId(uuid), Name = "eq", DriverInstanceId = "d", UnsLineId = "line-a", MachineCode = "m", ZTag = "ZT-001" }],
ActiveReservations = [new ExternalIdReservation { Kind = ReservationKind.ZTag, Value = "ZT-001", EquipmentUuid = otherUuid, ClusterId = "c", FirstPublishedBy = "t" }],
};
DraftValidator.Validate(draft).ShouldContain(e => e.Code == "BadDuplicateExternalIdentifier");
}
/// <summary>Verifies that equipment ID must be derived from its UUID.</summary>
[Fact]
public void EquipmentId_that_does_not_match_derivation_is_rejected()
{
var uuid = Guid.NewGuid();
var draft = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 1, ClusterId = "c",
Equipment = [new Equipment { EquipmentUuid = uuid, EquipmentId = "EQ-operator-typed", Name = "eq", DriverInstanceId = "d", UnsLineId = "line-a", MachineCode = "m" }],
};
DraftValidator.Validate(draft).ShouldContain(e => e.Code == "EquipmentIdNotDerived");
}
/// <summary>Verifies that the canonical Galaxy driver type (GalaxyMxGateway, per PR 7.2 —
/// it was "Galaxy" pre-PR-7.2) is allowed in a SystemPlatform namespace, i.e. produces no
/// kind-mismatch error.</summary>
[Fact]
public void GalaxyMxGateway_driver_in_SystemPlatform_namespace_is_allowed()
{
var draft = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 1, ClusterId = "c",
Namespaces = [new Namespace { NamespaceId = "ns-1", ClusterId = "c", NamespaceUri = "urn:x", Kind = NamespaceKind.SystemPlatform }],
DriverInstances = [new DriverInstance { DriverInstanceId = "d-1", ClusterId = "c", NamespaceId = "ns-1", Name = "drv", DriverType = "GalaxyMxGateway", DriverConfig = "{}" }],
};
DraftValidator.Validate(draft).ShouldNotContain(e => e.Code == "DriverNamespaceKindMismatch");
}
/// <summary>Verifies that the canonical Galaxy driver type cannot be placed in an Equipment namespace.</summary>
[Fact]
public void GalaxyMxGateway_driver_in_Equipment_namespace_is_rejected()
{
var draft = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 1, ClusterId = "c",
Namespaces = [new Namespace { NamespaceId = "ns-1", ClusterId = "c", NamespaceUri = "urn:x", Kind = NamespaceKind.Equipment }],
DriverInstances = [new DriverInstance { DriverInstanceId = "d-1", ClusterId = "c", NamespaceId = "ns-1", Name = "drv", DriverType = "GalaxyMxGateway", DriverConfig = "{}" }],
};
DraftValidator.Validate(draft).ShouldContain(e => e.Code == "DriverNamespaceKindMismatch");
}
/// <summary>Verifies that a non-Galaxy driver cannot be placed in a SystemPlatform namespace.</summary>
[Fact]
public void NonGalaxy_driver_in_SystemPlatform_namespace_is_rejected()
{
var draft = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 1, ClusterId = "c",
Namespaces = [new Namespace { NamespaceId = "ns-1", ClusterId = "c", NamespaceUri = "urn:x", Kind = NamespaceKind.SystemPlatform }],
DriverInstances = [new DriverInstance { DriverInstanceId = "d-1", ClusterId = "c", NamespaceId = "ns-1", Name = "drv", DriverType = "ModbusTcp", DriverConfig = "{}" }],
};
DraftValidator.Validate(draft).ShouldContain(e => e.Code == "DriverNamespaceKindMismatch");
}
/// <summary>Verifies that all validation errors are reported simultaneously.</summary>
[Fact]
public void Draft_with_three_violations_surfaces_all_three()
{
var uuid = Guid.NewGuid();
var draft = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 1, ClusterId = "c-A",
Namespaces = [new Namespace { NamespaceId = "ns-1", ClusterId = "c-B", NamespaceUri = "urn:x", Kind = NamespaceKind.Equipment }],
DriverInstances = [new DriverInstance { DriverInstanceId = "d-1", ClusterId = "c-A", NamespaceId = "ns-1", Name = "drv", DriverType = "GalaxyMxGateway", DriverConfig = "{}" }],
Equipment = [new Equipment { EquipmentUuid = uuid, EquipmentId = "EQ-wrong", Name = "BAD NAME", DriverInstanceId = "d-1", UnsLineId = "line-a", MachineCode = "m" }],
};
var errors = DraftValidator.Validate(draft);
errors.ShouldContain(e => e.Code == "BadCrossClusterNamespaceBinding");
errors.ShouldContain(e => e.Code == "DriverNamespaceKindMismatch");
errors.ShouldContain(e => e.Code == "EquipmentIdNotDerived");
errors.ShouldContain(e => e.Code == "UnsSegmentInvalid");
}
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Phase 6.3 task #148 part 2 — ValidateClusterTopology
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/// <summary>Verifies that cluster topology validation checks node count against declared redundancy mode.</summary>
/// <param name="nodeCount">The declared cluster node count.</param>
/// <param name="mode">The declared redundancy mode.</param>
/// <param name="enabledNodes">The number of enabled nodes to include in the topology.</param>
/// <param name="expectedDeclaredErrors">The number of ClusterRedundancyModeInvalid errors expected.</param>
[Theory]
[InlineData(1, RedundancyMode.None, 1, 0)] // single-node standalone — ok
[InlineData(2, RedundancyMode.Warm, 2, 0)] // 2-node warm — ok
[InlineData(2, RedundancyMode.Hot, 2, 0)] // 2-node hot — ok
[InlineData(1, RedundancyMode.Warm, 1, 1)] // declared mismatch — should flag
[InlineData(2, RedundancyMode.None, 2, 1)] // None with 2 nodes — should flag
public void ValidateClusterTopology_checks_declared_pair(
byte nodeCount, RedundancyMode mode, int enabledNodes, int expectedDeclaredErrors)
{
var cluster = BuildCluster(nodeCount: nodeCount, mode: mode);
var nodes = Enumerable.Range(0, enabledNodes)
.Select(i => BuildNode($"n-{i}", enabled: true))
.ToList();
var errors = DraftValidator.ValidateClusterTopology(cluster, nodes);
errors.Count(e => e.Code == "ClusterRedundancyModeInvalid").ShouldBe(expectedDeclaredErrors);
}
/// <summary>Verifies that disabled nodes cause topology validation to fail.</summary>
[Fact]
public void ValidateClusterTopology_flags_disabled_node_mismatch()
{
// Declared 2 + Hot, but one node disabled — runtime would boot InvalidTopology.
var cluster = BuildCluster(nodeCount: 2, mode: RedundancyMode.Hot);
var nodes = new[]
{
BuildNode("primary", enabled: true),
BuildNode("backup", enabled: false),
};
var errors = DraftValidator.ValidateClusterTopology(cluster, nodes);
errors.ShouldContain(e => e.Code == "ClusterEnabledNodeCountMismatch");
}
// v2: the "exactly one Primary per cluster" check is gone — Akka cluster's
// role-leader-of-"driver" elects the primary at runtime. The corresponding
// ValidateClusterTopology_flags_multiple_Primary test (and the
// ClusterMultiplePrimary error code it asserted) were removed alongside Task 14d.
/// <summary>Verifies that a valid standalone cluster passes validation.</summary>
[Fact]
public void ValidateClusterTopology_returns_no_errors_on_valid_standalone()
{
var cluster = BuildCluster(nodeCount: 1, mode: RedundancyMode.None);
var nodes = new[] { BuildNode("only", enabled: true) };
var errors = DraftValidator.ValidateClusterTopology(cluster, nodes);
errors.ShouldBeEmpty();
}
private static ServerCluster BuildCluster(byte nodeCount, RedundancyMode mode) => new()
{
ClusterId = "c-test",
Name = "Test",
Enterprise = "zb",
Site = "dev",
NodeCount = nodeCount,
RedundancyMode = mode,
Enabled = true,
CreatedBy = "t",
};
private static ClusterNode BuildNode(string id, bool enabled) => new()
{
NodeId = id,
ClusterId = "c-test",
Host = "localhost",
OpcUaPort = 4840,
DashboardPort = 5001,
ApplicationUri = $"urn:{id}",
ServiceLevelBase = 200,
Enabled = enabled,
CreatedBy = "t",
};
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
// ValidatePathLength — Enterprise/Site length precision (Configuration-003)
// ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/// <summary>Verifies that path length validation uses actual Enterprise and Site lengths.</summary>
[Fact]
public void PathLength_uses_actual_Enterprise_Site_when_provided()
{
// Craft a snapshot where the 32+32 approximation would flag PathTooLong but the
// actual Enterprise/Site lengths would not. Equipment name intentionally exceeds the
// UNS-segment 32-char limit (it would also trigger UnsSegmentInvalid — that is fine;
// both checks are independent and the test is filtering only on PathTooLong).
//
// approx: 32+32 + 32+32+90 +4 = 222 > 200 → would flag PathTooLong
// actual: 2 +1 + 32+32+90 +4 = 161 ≤ 200 → no PathTooLong
var areaId = "area-a";
var lineId = "line-b";
var uuid = Guid.NewGuid();
var eqName = new string('x', 90); // 90 chars — exceeds UNS regex but that's a separate error
var snapshot = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 1,
ClusterId = "c",
Enterprise = "zb", // 2 chars (actual)
Site = "s", // 1 char (actual)
UnsAreas = [new UnsArea { UnsAreaId = areaId, ClusterId = "c", Name = new string('a', 32) }],
UnsLines = [new UnsLine { UnsLineId = lineId, UnsAreaId = areaId, Name = new string('b', 32) }],
Equipment =
[
new Equipment
{
EquipmentUuid = uuid,
EquipmentId = DraftValidator.DeriveEquipmentId(uuid),
Name = eqName,
DriverInstanceId = "d",
UnsLineId = lineId,
MachineCode = "m",
},
],
};
var errors = DraftValidator.Validate(snapshot);
errors.ShouldNotContain(e => e.Code == "PathTooLong",
"actual Enterprise='zb' + Site='s' keeps total path at 161 chars — under the 200-char limit");
}
/// <summary>Verifies that path length validation uses conservative fallback when Enterprise and Site are absent.</summary>
[Fact]
public void PathLength_conservative_fallback_when_Enterprise_Site_absent()
{
// Without Enterprise/Site on the snapshot the validator assumes 32+32.
// A path whose segments sum to 93 chars (area=32 + line=32 + eq=29) fits
// under 200 even with the 32+32 approximation (32+32+93+4 = 161 ≤ 200) and
// must NOT be flagged — the fallback must not over-penalise valid paths that
// would also be valid under real Enterprise/Site values.
var areaId = "area-x";
var lineId = "line-y";
var uuid = Guid.NewGuid();
var snapshot = new DraftSnapshot
{
GenerationId = 1,
ClusterId = "c",
// Enterprise and Site deliberately omitted — conservative fallback path
UnsAreas = [new UnsArea { UnsAreaId = areaId, ClusterId = "c", Name = new string('a', 32) }],
UnsLines = [new UnsLine { UnsLineId = lineId, UnsAreaId = areaId, Name = new string('b', 32) }],
Equipment =
[
new Equipment
{
EquipmentUuid = uuid,
EquipmentId = DraftValidator.DeriveEquipmentId(uuid),
Name = new string('c', 29),
DriverInstanceId = "d",
UnsLineId = lineId,
MachineCode = "m",
},
],
};
var errors = DraftValidator.Validate(snapshot);
errors.ShouldNotContain(e => e.Code == "PathTooLong",
"conservative 32+32+32+32+29+4 = 161 chars is still under the 200-char limit");
}
}