# FOCAS test fixture Coverage map + gap inventory for the FANUC FOCAS2 CNC driver. **TL;DR: there is no integration fixture.** Every test uses a `FakeFocasClient` injected via `IFocasClientFactory`. Fanuc's FOCAS library (`Fwlib32.dll`) is closed-source proprietary with no public simulator; CNC-side behavior is trusted from field deployments. ## What the fixture is Nothing at the integration layer. `tests/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Driver.FOCAS.Tests/` is unit-only. The driver ships as Tier C (process-isolated) per `docs/v2/driver-stability.md` because the FANUC DLL has known crash modes; tests can't replicate those in-process. ## What it actually covers (unit only) - `FocasCapabilityTests` — data-type mapping (PMC bit / word / float, macro variable types, parameter types) - `FocasReadWriteTests` — read + write against the fake, FOCAS native status → OPC UA StatusCode mapping - `FocasScaffoldingTests` — `IDriver` lifecycle + multi-device routing - `FocasPmcBitRmwTests` — PMC bit read-modify-write synchronization (per-byte `SemaphoreSlim`, mirrors the AB / Modbus pattern from #181) - `FwlibNativeHelperTests` — `Focas32.dll` → `Fwlib32.dll` bridge validation + P/Invoke signature validation Capability surfaces whose contract is verified: `IDriver`, `IReadable`, `IWritable`, `ITagDiscovery`, `ISubscribable`, `IHostConnectivityProbe`, `IPerCallHostResolver`. ## What it does NOT cover ### 1. FOCAS wire traffic No FOCAS TCP frame is sent. `Fwlib32.dll`'s TCP-to-FANUC-gateway exchange is closed-source; the driver trusts the P/Invoke layer per #193. Real CNC correctness is trusted from field deployments. ### 2. Alarm / parameter-change callbacks FOCAS has no push model — the driver polls via the shared `PollGroupEngine`. There are no CNC-initiated callbacks to test; the absence is by design. ### 3. Macro / ladder variable types FANUC has CNC-specific extensions (macro variables `#100-#999`, system variables `#1000-#5000`, PMC timers / counters / keep-relays) whose per-address semantics differ across 0i-F / 30i / 31i / 32i Series. Driver covers the common address shapes; per-model quirks are not stressed. ### 4. Model-specific behavior - Alarm retention across power cycles (model-specific CNC behavior) - Parameter range enforcement (CNC rejects out-of-range writes) - MTB (machine tool builder) custom screens that expose non-standard data ### 5. Tier-C process isolation behavior Per driver-stability.md, FOCAS should run process-isolated because `Fwlib32.dll` has documented crash modes. The test suite runs in-process + only exercises the happy path + mapped error codes — a native access violation from the DLL would take the test host down. The process-isolation path (similar to Galaxy's out-of-process Host) has been scoped but not implemented. ## When to trust FOCAS tests, when to reach for a rig | Question | Unit tests | Real CNC | | --- | --- | --- | | "Does PMC address `R100.3` route to the right bit?" | yes | yes | | "Does the FANUC status → OPC UA StatusCode map cover every documented code?" | yes (contract) | yes | | "Does a real read against a 30i Series return correct bytes?" | no | yes (required) | | "Does `Fwlib32.dll` crash on concurrent reads?" | no | yes (stress) | | "Do macro variables round-trip across power cycles?" | no | yes (required) | ## Follow-up candidates 1. **Nothing public** — Fanuc's FOCAS Developer Kit ships an emulator DLL but it's under NDA + tied to licensed dev-kit installations; can't redistribute for CI. 2. **Lab rig** — used FANUC 0i-F simulator controller (or a retired machine tool) on a dedicated network; only path that covers real CNC behavior. 3. **Process isolation first** — before trusting FOCAS in production at scale, shipping the Tier-C out-of-process Host architecture (similar to Galaxy) is higher value than a CI simulator. ## Key fixture / config files - `tests/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Driver.FOCAS.Tests/FakeFocasClient.cs` — in-process fake implementing `IFocasClient` - `src/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Driver.FOCAS/FocasDriver.cs` — ctor takes `IFocasClientFactory` - `docs/v2/driver-stability.md` — Tier C scope + process-isolation rationale