# Siemens S7 test fixture Coverage map + gap inventory for the S7 driver. **TL;DR:** S7 now has a wire-level integration fixture backed by [python-snap7](https://github.com/gijzelaerr/python-snap7)'s `Server` class (task #216). Atomic reads (u16 / i16 / i32 / f32 / bool-with-bit) + DB write-then-read round-trip are exercised end-to-end through S7netplus + real ISO-on-TCP on `localhost:1102`. Unit tests still carry everything else (address parsing, error-branch handling, probe-loop contract). Gaps remaining are variant-quirk-shaped: Optimized-DB symbolic access, PG/OP session types, PUT/GET-disabled enforcement — all need real hardware. ## What the fixture is **Integration layer** (task #216): `tests/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Driver.S7.IntegrationTests/` stands up a python-snap7 `Server` via `Docker/docker-compose.yml --profile s7_1500` on `localhost:1102` (pinned `python:3.12-slim-bookworm` base + `python-snap7>=2.0`). Docker is the only supported launch path. `Snap7ServerFixture` probes the port at collection init + skips with a clear message when unreachable (matches the pymodbus pattern). `server.py` (baked into the image under `Docker/`) reads a JSON profile + seeds DB/MB bytes at declared offsets; seeds are typed (`u16` / `i16` / `i32` / `f32` / `bool` / `ascii` for S7 STRING). **Unit layer**: `tests/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Driver.S7.Tests/` covers everything the wire-level suite doesn't — address parsing, error branches, probe-loop contract. All tests tagged `[Trait("Category", "Unit")]`. The driver ctor change that made this possible: `Plc(CpuType, host, port, rack, slot)` — S7netplus 0.20's 5-arg overload — wires `S7DriverOptions.Port` through so the simulator can bind 1102 (non-privileged) instead of 102 (root / Firewall-prompt territory). ## What it actually covers ### Integration (python-snap7, task #216) - `S7_1500SmokeTests.Driver_reads_seeded_u16_through_real_S7comm` — DB1.DBW0 read via real S7netplus over TCP + simulator; proves handshake + read path - `S7_1500SmokeTests.Driver_reads_seeded_typed_batch` — i16, i32, f32, bool-with-bit in one batch call; proves typed decode per S7DataType - `S7_1500SmokeTests.Driver_write_then_read_round_trip_on_scratch_word` — `DB1.DBW100` write → read-back; proves write path + buffer visibility ### Unit - `S7AddressParserTests` — S7 address syntax (`DB1.DBD0`, `M10.3`, `IW4`, etc.) - `S7DriverScaffoldTests` — `IDriver` lifecycle (init / reinit / shutdown / health) - `S7DriverReadWriteTests` — error paths (uninitialized read/write, bad addresses, transport exceptions) - `S7DiscoveryAndSubscribeTests` — `ITagDiscovery.DiscoverAsync` + polled `ISubscribable` contract with the shared `PollGroupEngine` Capability surfaces whose contract is verified: `IDriver`, `ITagDiscovery`, `IReadable`, `IWritable`, `ISubscribable`, `IHostConnectivityProbe`. Wire-level surfaces verified: `IReadable`, `IWritable`. ## What it does NOT cover ### 1. Wire-level anything No ISO-on-TCP frame is ever sent during the test suite. S7netplus is the only wire-path abstraction and it has no in-process fake mode; the shipping choice was to contract-test via `IS7Client` rather than patch into S7netplus internals. ### 2. Read/write happy path Every `S7DriverReadWriteTests` case exercises error branches. A successful read returning real PLC data is not tested end-to-end — the return value is whatever the fake says it is. ### 3. Mailbox serialization under concurrent reads The driver's `SemaphoreSlim` serializes S7netplus calls because the S7 CPU's comm mailbox is scanned at most once per cycle. Contention behavior under real PLC latency is not exercised. ### 4. Variant quirks S7-1200 vs S7-1500 vs S7-300/400 connection semantics (PG vs OP vs S7-Basic) not differentiated at test time. ### 5. Data types beyond the scalars UDT fan-out, `STRING` with length-prefix quirks, `DTL` / `DATE_AND_TIME`, arrays of structs — not covered. ## When to trust the S7 tests, when to reach for a rig | Question | Unit tests | Real PLC | | --- | --- | --- | | "Does the address parser accept X syntax?" | yes | - | | "Does the driver lifecycle hang / crash?" | yes | yes | | "Does a real read against an S7-1500 return correct bytes?" | no | yes (required) | | "Does mailbox serialization actually prevent PG timeouts?" | no | yes (required) | | "Does a UDT fan-out produce usable member variables?" | no | yes (required) | ## Follow-up candidates 1. **Snap7 server** — [Snap7](https://snap7.sourceforge.net/) ships a C-library-based S7 server that could run in-CI on Linux. A pinned build + a fixture shape similar to `ab_server` would give S7 parity with Modbus / AB CIP coverage. 2. **Plcsim Advanced** — Siemens' paid emulator. Licensed per-seat; fits a lab rig but not CI. 3. **Real S7 lab rig** — cheapest physical PLC (CPU 1212C) on a dedicated network port, wired via self-hosted runner. Without any of these, S7 driver correctness against real hardware is trusted from field deployments, not from the test suite. ## Key fixture / config files - `tests/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Driver.S7.Tests/` — unit tests only, no harness - `src/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Driver.S7/S7Driver.cs` — ctor takes `IS7ClientFactory` which tests fake; docstring lines 8-20 note the deferred integration fixture