using Akka.Actor;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration;
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
using Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting;
using Shouldly;
using Xunit;
using ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Host.Configuration;
using ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets.Abstractions;
using ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets.Replication;
using ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets.Sqlite;

namespace ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Host.IntegrationTests;

/// <summary>
///     Guards the production DI wiring for cluster secret replication (<c>AddOtOpcUaSecrets</c>).
///     This is the registration half of a defect class that has already shipped once in this library
///     family: every unit test passed because nothing ever built a container, so a decorator that
///     could not actually be constructed went unnoticed.
///
///     Two properties matter here, and both are load-bearing on <b>driver-role</b> nodes that have no
///     auth/AdminUI surface and whose only symptom of a broken registration is drivers failing to
///     open sessions:
///     <list type="number">
///         <item>
///             With replication off (the default), <see cref="ISecretStore"/> must resolve to the
///             plain <see cref="SqliteSecretStore"/> — byte-identical to the pre-replication host.
///         </item>
///         <item>
///             With replication on, <see cref="ISecretStore"/> must resolve to
///             <see cref="ReplicatingSecretStore"/> <b>and</b> the undecorated concrete
///             <see cref="SqliteSecretStore"/> must still resolve, because the decorator is
///             constructed from it. A missing concrete registration is the exact gap that shipped.
///         </item>
///     </list>
/// </summary>
public sealed class SecretsReplicationRegistrationTests
{
    /// <summary>
    ///     Builds a container mirroring the host's registration order: Akka first (the host calls
    ///     <c>AddAkka</c> before <c>AddOtOpcUaSecrets</c>), then secrets.
    /// </summary>
    private static ServiceProvider BuildProvider(bool replicationEnabled, ActorSystem? actorSystem = null) =>
        BuildServices(replicationEnabled, actorSystem).BuildServiceProvider();

    /// <summary>
    ///     The registrations without building the provider, for assertions about which descriptor
    ///     won a <c>TryAdd</c> race. Resolving some of these services has side effects (constructing
    ///     the Akka replicator spawns an actor that needs a joined cluster), so the descriptor is
    ///     the only place certain defects can be observed without a real cluster.
    /// </summary>
    private static IServiceCollection BuildServices(bool replicationEnabled, ActorSystem? actorSystem = null)
    {
        var configuration = new ConfigurationBuilder()
            .AddInMemoryCollection(new Dictionary<string, string?>
            {
                // A per-test SQLite path keeps these hermetic; nothing here opens the file, because
                // resolving the store does not touch the database.
                ["Secrets:SqlitePath"] = Path.Combine(Path.GetTempPath(), $"otopcua-secrets-{Guid.NewGuid():N}.db"),
                ["Secrets:MasterKey:Source"] = "Environment",
                ["Secrets:MasterKey:EnvVarName"] = "ZB_SECRETS_MASTER_KEY",
                ["Secrets:RunMigrationsOnStartup"] = "false",
                ["Secrets:Replication:Enabled"] = replicationEnabled ? "true" : "false",
                ["Secrets:Replication:AnnounceInterval"] = "00:00:30",
                ["Secrets:Replication:ActorName"] = "zb-secret-replication",
            })
            .Build();

        var services = new ServiceCollection();
        services.AddLogging();

        // The replicating store reaches the ActorSystem through SecretReplicationActorProvider.
        // The host supplies one via Akka.Hosting; a plain system is equivalent for registration.
        if (actorSystem is not null)
            services.AddSingleton(actorSystem);

        services.AddOtOpcUaSecrets(configuration);

        return services;
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Replication_disabled_resolves_the_plain_sqlite_store()
    {
        using var sp = BuildProvider(replicationEnabled: false);

        var store = sp.GetRequiredService<ISecretStore>();

        store.ShouldBeOfType<SqliteSecretStore>(
            "replication is opt-in — with Secrets:Replication:Enabled false the host must resolve the "
            + "plain local store, so existing nodes are behaviourally unchanged");
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Replication_disabled_does_not_require_an_actor_system()
    {
        // A driver-role node builds its container before the ActorSystem is reachable for secret
        // resolution; the default path must not have taken a dependency on it.
        using var sp = BuildProvider(replicationEnabled: false);

        Should.NotThrow(() => sp.GetRequiredService<ISecretStore>());
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Replication_enabled_decorates_the_store_so_writes_publish()
    {
        // Asserted on the ServiceCollection rather than a built provider, deliberately. Resolving
        // ISecretStore with replication on constructs ReplicatingSecretStore, which resolves
        // ISecretReplicator, which eagerly spawns the replication actor, whose PreStart calls
        // DistributedPubSub.Get(...) — unavailable until the node has joined a cluster. Against a
        // plain ActorSystem that resolve hangs instead of failing.
        //
        // Akka.TestKit is the family convention for this (ScadaBridge's suites use it throughout)
        // and would be the right tool, but it is NOT available here: Akka.TestKit.Xunit2 is
        // xunit-v2-only, and this project is one of the 44 on xunit.v3. Adding it yields CS0433
        // type conflicts. Directory.Packages.props documents the same constraint — AdminUI.Tests,
        // ControlPlane.Tests and Runtime.Tests are deliberately held on xunit v2 precisely because
        // no xunit.v3 TestKit ships as of Akka 1.5.62. Host wiring tests belong here, not in one of
        // those three, so the descriptor is the right seam until Akka ships a v3 TestKit.
        //
        // Nothing is lost: the registration order IS the defect, and the library's own
        // TwoNodeClusterReplicationTests already cover actor creation and convergence against a
        // genuine 2-node cluster.
        //
        // AddSingleton (not TryAdd) appends the decorator, and the LAST registration for a service
        // type is what the container resolves.
        var last = BuildServices(replicationEnabled: true)
            .Last(d => d.ServiceType == typeof(ISecretStore));

        last.ImplementationFactory.ShouldNotBeNull(
            "with replication enabled the local store must be decorated so writes publish to peers");
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Replication_enabled_still_registers_the_undecorated_concrete_store()
    {
        // The decorator is constructed from the concrete SqliteSecretStore, not from ISecretStore
        // (which would recurse). Core registering it only behind ISecretStore is a gap that has
        // already shipped in this library once, so pin it.
        BuildServices(replicationEnabled: true)
            .ShouldContain(d => d.ServiceType == typeof(SqliteSecretStore));
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Replication_enabled_registers_a_startup_hook_that_forces_actor_creation()
    {
        // The replication actor is created LAZILY on first ISecretStore resolution. A node that
        // never reads or writes a secret would therefore never join anti-entropy and would silently
        // never converge — so the host must register a startup hook that forces the resolution.
        using var sp = BuildProvider(replicationEnabled: true);

        var starter = sp.GetServices<IHostedService>().OfType<SecretReplicationStarter>().SingleOrDefault();

        starter.ShouldNotBeNull(
            "replication must not depend on something happening to resolve ISecretStore later");
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Replication_binds_a_real_replicator_not_the_no_op_sink()
    {
        // THE REGRESSION GUARD for the upstream defect found during this adoption.
        // ZB.MOM.WW.Secrets.Replicator.AkkaDotNet 0.2.0 never bound its own ISecretReplicator:
        // AddZbSecretsAkkaReplication called AddZbSecrets FIRST, which does
        // TryAddSingleton<ISecretReplicator, NoOpSecretReplicator>(), so the package's own TryAdd
        // was silently discarded. Writes published into a sink and no actor was ever spawned, with
        // no exception and no log line. Fixed in 0.2.1 by registering before that call.
        var descriptor = BuildServices(replicationEnabled: true)
            .Single(d => d.ServiceType == typeof(ISecretReplicator));

        // The no-op is registered by concrete type; the real replicator via a factory, because it
        // needs the lazily-created actor ref. A factory here proves the package's descriptor won.
        descriptor.ImplementationType.ShouldBeNull(
            "ISecretReplicator resolved to the no-op sink — replication would publish into nothing");
        descriptor.ImplementationFactory.ShouldNotBeNull();
    }

    [Fact]
    public void Replication_disabled_registers_no_startup_hook()
    {
        using var sp = BuildProvider(replicationEnabled: false);

        sp.GetServices<IHostedService>().OfType<SecretReplicationStarter>().ShouldBeEmpty();
    }
}