Flipped the docker-dev rig end-to-end to MeshTransport:Mode=ClusterClient
(OTOPCUA_MESH_MODE, no rebuild) and ran the gate. PASSED for the transport:
deploy seals on ClusterClient, a stopped node fails the deploy naming it, the
MaintenanceMode hatch shrinks the DB-sourced contact set live (6->5->6 on both
centrals independently), and the frame-size canary stayed silent.
Four findings, recorded in 2026-07-22-mesh-phase2-live-gate.md:
A. A 10-30s post-restart delivery window exists, but the DPS control fails
identically -- it is a cluster-convergence property, not a Phase 2
regression. Running the control is the only reason this is a note and not
a false attribution.
B. buffer-size=0's stated rationale was OVERSTATED. A node applies a TimedOut
deployment anyway -- live-observed at +44s -- via DriverHostActor.Bootstrap
replaying the orphan Applying row on restart. Zero buffering removes the
silent, timer-driven replay, not the boot-time DB one. Corrected in the
plan decisions table, Configuration.md, and CLAUDE.md; the decision stands,
the justification narrowed.
C. Stopping BOTH centrals strands the non-seed nodes at the Akka membership
layer (frozen mid-Exiting, not Unreachable, so auto-down does not help).
Transport-independent; a Phase 7 downing/rejoin drill item.
D. The AdminUI driver Restart/Reconnect buttons (DriverStatusPanel) are
rendered by no page -- orphaned since v3 Batch 2 retired /clusters/{id}/
drivers. So gate steps 6/7 could not run; the driver-control node-side leg
is proven live only because DispatchDeployment shares its EventStream path.
Step 8's planned log-signal does not exist (HandleApplyAck is silent on
success); proven instead by both centrals independently logging per-instance
ClusterClient creation, which a singleton cannot.
Also adds a repo-root .dockerignore: docker-dev/Dockerfile does COPY . ., which
was pulling .claude/worktrees (19GB of agent checkouts with their own bin/obj)
into the build context and exhausting the Docker VM disk mid-COPY.
Rig restored to Mode=Dps, six members, no leftover maintenance flags.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Phase 2 of the per-cluster mesh program: move the three central->node command
channels (deployments, driver-control, alarm-commands) and the deployment-acks
reply channel off DistributedPubSub onto Akka ClusterClient, behind a config
flag.
Recon of both repos turned up three corrections to the design doc's account of
the sister project, all folded into the plan:
- Design doc S2 claims "every unhandled message replies with a typed failure".
ScadaBridge has no ReceiveAny/Unhandled override in either comm actor; the
typed-failure idiom fires only for a MISSING REGISTRATION, per message type.
- "No central buffering" was never a setting they wrote. They have zero
akka.cluster.client HOCON and run the defaults (buffer-size 1000,
reconnect-timeout off). We choose buffer-size = 0 deliberately.
- Publish -> Send is the wrong substitution. Today's deploy notify is a
broadcast every DriverHostActor receives (no ClusterId filter exists on the
node side), so it must become SendToAll. Send would deploy to exactly one
node of the fleet and seal green on partial acks.
Also records the single-mesh duplicate-delivery trap (one ClusterClient in
Phase 2, not one per Cluster -- a receptionist serves its whole mesh) and one
deviation from the program plan's exit gate: there is no cross-boundary Ask in
Phase 2, because every migrated command is fire-and-forget with a local reply,
so "an Ask timing out cleanly" cannot be run as written.
Marks the program tracking tables current: prereq + Phase 1 are DONE (they
still read "not executed"), Phase 2 in progress.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
Joseph Doherty