fix(drivers): fail the apply when the artifact could not be read (#486)

ApplyAndAck advanced _currentRevision and recorded NodeDeploymentState=Applied
immediately after ReconcileDrivers, which returns null when the artifact could
not be read. So a node that applied NOTHING reported success, claimed a
revision whose configuration it never applied, and — because
HandleDispatchFromSteady short-circuits on a revision match — could never be
healed by re-dispatching that revision. Only a later, different revision
recovered it.

Now a null blob fails the apply: the revision is left where it was,
NodeDeploymentState records Failed with the reason, and the coordinator gets a
Failed ACK. Leaving the revision alone is what makes the retry actually land
instead of being waved through.

This is about telling the truth, not about tearing anything down — the node
keeps serving its last-known-good address space, drivers and subscriptions
throughout (#485).

Tests, RED-first (both verified failing with "should be Failed but was
Applied"): the ACK/revision assertion, plus the one that matters — after a
failed apply, re-dispatching the SAME revision now genuinely applies. Its
recovered artifact adds a second driver precisely so a short-circuited ACK
(which has no side effects) cannot satisfy it.

Four existing tests changed, and both changes are deliberate:

- DriverHostActorTests.SeedDeployment never set ArtifactBlob at all. Its three
  consumers are about the apply/ACK/state machine, not the artifact, and now
  need a genuine apply — so the helper seeds a well-formed artifact declaring
  no drivers. That is what the composer emits for an empty configuration, and
  is precisely what "bytes we could not read" is NOT.
- EmptyArtifact_IsNotCached asserted "the apply still succeeds — an empty
  artifact is a legitimate no-op deployment". That premise is the bug. Flipped
  to Failed; the test's actual subject (nothing is cached) is untouched and now
  holds for two independent reasons.

Closes #486

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
This commit is contained in:
Joseph Doherty
2026-07-21 03:22:40 -04:00
parent 5627d325eb
commit ef41a43102
4 changed files with 140 additions and 3 deletions
@@ -1579,6 +1579,29 @@ public sealed class DriverHostActor : ReceiveActor, IWithTimers
try
{
var appliedBlob = ReconcileDrivers(deploymentId);
// Issue #486 — a null blob means the artifact could not be read (unreachable ConfigDb, or the
// empty bytes a missing row yields), so NOTHING was applied. Reporting Applied here used to
// advance _currentRevision too, and HandleDispatchFromSteady short-circuits on a revision
// match — so the node claimed a configuration it never applied AND could never be healed by
// re-dispatching that revision. Failing the apply keeps the revision where it was, which is
// what makes the retry land instead of being waved through. The node keeps serving its
// last-known-good address space, drivers and subscriptions throughout (issue #485) — this is
// about telling the truth, not about tearing anything down.
if (appliedBlob is null)
{
const string reason =
"the deployment artifact could not be read (ConfigDb unreachable, or the row is missing/empty); nothing was applied";
UpsertNodeDeploymentState(deploymentId, NodeDeploymentStatus.Failed, reason);
SendAck(deploymentId, ApplyAckOutcome.Failed, reason, correlation);
OtOpcUaTelemetry.DeploymentApplied.Add(1, new KeyValuePair<string, object?>("outcome", "reject"));
span?.SetStatus(ActivityStatusCode.Error, reason);
_log.Error(
"DriverHost {Node}: apply of {Id} FAILED — {Reason}. Staying on revision {Rev} and continuing to serve it; re-dispatch once the ConfigDb is readable",
_localNode, deploymentId, reason, _currentRevision);
return;
}
_currentRevision = revision;
UpsertNodeDeploymentState(deploymentId, NodeDeploymentStatus.Applied, failureReason: null);
SendAck(deploymentId, ApplyAckOutcome.Applied, failureReason: null, correlation);