fix(cluster): don't self-form while a seed peer is reachable — the fallback islanded a restarting node
The live gate for the manual-failover control caught the self-form fallback forming a SECOND cluster. A node bounced by a failover restarted, received InitJoinAck from its live peer — the join was in flight and healthy — but did not get the Welcome inside the 10s window, because the peer's ring still held the node's previous incarnation (Exiting -> Down -> Removed). The fallback fired on the timer and the node islanded itself until an operator restarted it. The original design assumed Cluster.Join(SelfAddress) would be ignored mid-handshake. It is not — it wins. And since manual failover deliberately produces that restart, every failover could island the node it bounced. Before self-forming, TCP-probe the other seed addresses; a reachable peer means wait another window instead. That is also what the fallback claims to detect: 'no seed answered InitJoin (peer down at boot)'. Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01GASWkNEi68FSCtvr6rLoEW
This commit is contained in:
@@ -173,6 +173,60 @@ public sealed class SelfFormBootstrapTests
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// Regression for the live-gate islanding defect (2026-07-22). A peer that is <b>reachable</b>
|
||||
/// but not yet admitting the join must NOT be treated as "peer down at boot".
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
/// <remarks>
|
||||
/// <para>
|
||||
/// On the docker-dev rig, a node bounced by a manual failover restarted, received
|
||||
/// <c>InitJoinAck</c> from its live peer — the join was in flight and healthy — but did
|
||||
/// not get the Welcome inside the window, because the peer's ring still held the node's
|
||||
/// previous incarnation. The fallback fired on the timer and the node formed a
|
||||
/// <i>second</i> cluster, islanded until an operator restarted it. The original design
|
||||
/// assumed <c>Join(SelfAddress)</c> would be ignored mid-handshake; it is not.
|
||||
/// </para>
|
||||
/// <para>
|
||||
/// The peer here is a bare <see cref="TcpListener"/> that accepts connections and speaks
|
||||
/// no Akka at all — reachable at the transport level, never answering a join. That is the
|
||||
/// defect's shape with nothing faked: under the pre-fix code this node self-formed on the
|
||||
/// timer; under the guard it keeps waiting. The positive control then proves the guard is
|
||||
/// a <i>guard</i> and not a disablement: drop the listener and the same node self-forms.
|
||||
/// </para>
|
||||
/// </remarks>
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
public async Task Reachable_peer_suppresses_self_forming_until_it_goes_away()
|
||||
{
|
||||
var selfPort = FreePort();
|
||||
var peerPort = FreePort();
|
||||
|
||||
// A peer that accepts TCP and does nothing else — reachable, but no join will ever complete.
|
||||
var peer = new TcpListener(IPAddress.Loopback, peerPort);
|
||||
peer.Start();
|
||||
|
||||
var host = await StartNodeAsync(
|
||||
"otopcua-selfform-4", selfPort, peerPort, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(2));
|
||||
try
|
||||
{
|
||||
var system = host.Services.GetRequiredService<ActorSystem>();
|
||||
|
||||
// Several windows pass. Pre-fix this self-formed after the first one.
|
||||
(await WaitForUpMemberAsync(system, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)))
|
||||
.ShouldBeFalse("a reachable peer means a join may be in flight — self-forming here islands this node");
|
||||
|
||||
// Positive control: the peer really goes away, and now the fallback does its job.
|
||||
peer.Stop();
|
||||
|
||||
(await WaitForUpMemberAsync(system, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30)))
|
||||
.ShouldBeTrue("once the peer is genuinely gone the fallback must still self-form");
|
||||
}
|
||||
finally
|
||||
{
|
||||
try { peer.Stop(); } catch (SocketException) { /* already stopped by the test body */ }
|
||||
await StopAsync(host);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// THE island guard. A node that is not in its own seed list — the current docker-dev site-node
|
||||
/// topology, where site-a/site-b list only central-1 — must never self-form: it would island
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user