test(focas): failing repro for STAB-5 cross-thread Dictionary mutation

This commit is contained in:
Joseph Doherty
2026-07-13 11:46:12 -04:00
parent 00dcb547e6
commit bb8386d126
2 changed files with 100 additions and 1 deletions
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
{
"id": "B2.4",
"subject": "B2: failing FocasFixedTreeConcurrencyTests (writer-vs-reader stress on the four DeviceState caches) \u2014 STAB-5 repro",
"status": "pending",
"status": "completed",
"blockedBy": []
},
{
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
using Shouldly;
using Xunit;
using ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Driver.FOCAS;
namespace ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Driver.FOCAS.Tests;
/// <summary>
/// Regression coverage for 05/STAB-5 — the four per-device fixed-tree caches
/// (<c>LastFixedSnapshots</c>, <c>LastTimers</c>, <c>LastServoLoads</c>, <c>LastSpindleLoads</c>)
/// are written by the background fixed-tree loop while <c>ReadAsync</c> callers read them
/// concurrently. A plain <see cref="System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary{TKey,TValue}"/>
/// throws / corrupts when a resize races a read — undefined behaviour. They must be
/// <see cref="System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentDictionary{TKey,TValue}"/>.
/// </summary>
[Trait("Category", "Unit")]
public sealed class FocasFixedTreeConcurrencyTests
{
private static FocasDriver.DeviceState NewDeviceState() =>
new(new FocasHostAddress("10.0.0.5", FocasHostAddress.DefaultPort),
new FocasDeviceOptions("focas://10.0.0.5"));
/// <summary>
/// Hammers concurrent writers (which force dictionary resizes) against concurrent readers on
/// all four caches. A plain <c>Dictionary</c> is not concurrency-safe: its structural-mutation
/// version check throws "operations that change non-concurrent collections must have exclusive
/// access to the collection", and its lookup collision guard throws "concurrent operations
/// are not supported" — deterministically under this load. A
/// <c>ConcurrentDictionary</c> never throws.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// Uses several writers, not one, so the fault is deterministic rather than timing-dependent
/// UB: the fixed-tree caches are shared mutable state with zero synchronization, so ANY
/// concurrent access is the defect — a driver that survives this survives the real
/// writer-loop-vs-reader-callers race the finding cites.
/// </remarks>
[Fact]
public async Task Concurrent_access_to_fixed_tree_caches_never_throws()
{
var state = NewDeviceState();
using var cts = new CancellationTokenSource(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(5));
var faults = new System.Collections.Concurrent.ConcurrentQueue<Exception>();
const int rounds = 40;
const int growth = 4_000;
void Writer(int seed)
{
try
{
for (var round = 0; round < rounds && !cts.IsCancellationRequested; round++)
{
state.LastFixedSnapshots.Clear();
state.LastServoLoads.Clear();
state.LastSpindleLoads.Clear();
for (var i = 0; i < growth; i++)
{
// Distinct keys force repeated dictionary growth (resize = the race window);
// the Clear() each round keeps the caches churning through resizes.
state.LastFixedSnapshots[$"Axes/A{seed}_{i}/AbsolutePosition"] = i;
state.LastServoLoads[$"Servo{seed}_{i}"] = i;
state.LastSpindleLoads[seed * growth + i] = i;
state.LastTimers[(FocasTimerKind)(i % 4)] = new FocasTimer((FocasTimerKind)(i % 4), i, i);
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex) { faults.Enqueue(ex); }
}
void Reader()
{
try
{
while (!cts.IsCancellationRequested && faults.IsEmpty)
{
for (var i = 0; i < growth; i++)
{
state.LastFixedSnapshots.TryGetValue($"Axes/A0_{i}/AbsolutePosition", out _);
state.LastServoLoads.TryGetValue($"Servo0_{i}", out _);
state.LastSpindleLoads.TryGetValue(i, out _);
state.LastTimers.TryGetValue((FocasTimerKind)(i % 4), out _);
}
}
}
catch (Exception ex) { faults.Enqueue(ex); }
}
var tasks = new List<Task>
{
Task.Run(() => Writer(0)),
Task.Run(() => Writer(1)),
Task.Run(() => Writer(2)),
Task.Run(Reader),
Task.Run(Reader),
};
await Task.WhenAll(tasks);
faults.ShouldBeEmpty(
faults.TryPeek(out var first) ? $"concurrent cache access threw: {first}" : "");
}
}