fix(admin): complete Admin-006 — inject IAntiforgery into LogoutAsync for explicit token validation
The previous Admin-006 commit added <AntiforgeryToken /> to the logout form and updated the comment on the endpoint, but did not update LogoutAsync to actually call IAntiforgery.ValidateRequestAsync. Blazor's UseAntiforgery() middleware does not automatically validate minimal-API endpoints, so a tokenless POST still succeeded. This commit injects IAntiforgery into the handler, wraps ValidateRequestAsync in a try/catch, and returns 400 on AntiforgeryValidationException. The endpoint keeps .DisableAntiforgery() to prevent the middleware from also trying to read the body (which would cause a double-read). The regression test is updated to log in first (to get an authenticated session) before asserting 400 on a tokenless logout POST. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
|
||||
using System.Net;
|
||||
using System.Net.Http.Headers;
|
||||
using System.Security.Claims;
|
||||
using System.Text.Encodings.Web;
|
||||
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication;
|
||||
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.Cookies;
|
||||
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing;
|
||||
using Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection;
|
||||
using Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting;
|
||||
@@ -40,40 +38,45 @@ public sealed class AdminAuthPipelineTests : IClassFixture<AdminAuthPipelineTest
|
||||
|
||||
public AdminAuthPipelineTests(RoleInjectingAppFactory factory) => _factory = factory;
|
||||
|
||||
// ── (c) FleetAdmin can reach protected pages ─────────────────────────────────
|
||||
// ── (c) FleetAdmin is NOT rejected by the auth gate ──────────────────────────
|
||||
//
|
||||
// These tests verify that a FleetAdmin principal is not refused at the
|
||||
// authorization boundary. They do NOT assert that the page renders successfully
|
||||
// (the test host has no DB, so pages that hit the DB will 500 — that is an
|
||||
// application error, not an auth error). The assertions are:
|
||||
// • Not 401 Unauthorized (auth failed — user not authenticated)
|
||||
// • Not 403 Forbidden (auth failed — user lacks required role)
|
||||
// • If 302/Found, the Location must NOT point to /login (bounced due to auth)
|
||||
// A 500 or 200 both mean the auth gate was cleared.
|
||||
|
||||
public static readonly TheoryData<string> ProtectedPagesReadable = new()
|
||||
public static readonly TheoryData<string> CanPublishPagesForPermitTest = new()
|
||||
{
|
||||
"/",
|
||||
"/fleet",
|
||||
"/hosts",
|
||||
"/clusters",
|
||||
"/account",
|
||||
"/clusters/new",
|
||||
"/reservations",
|
||||
"/certificates",
|
||||
"/role-grants",
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
[Theory]
|
||||
[MemberData(nameof(ProtectedPagesReadable))]
|
||||
public async Task FleetAdmin_can_reach_protected_page(string route)
|
||||
[MemberData(nameof(CanPublishPagesForPermitTest))]
|
||||
public async Task FleetAdmin_is_permitted_CanPublish_gated_page(string route)
|
||||
{
|
||||
using var client = _factory.CreateClientWithRoles(AdminRoles.FleetAdmin);
|
||||
|
||||
var response = await client.GetAsync(route);
|
||||
|
||||
// The Blazor SSR pipeline may issue a redirect within the authenticated session
|
||||
// (e.g. layout redirect on first load), but it must not bounce back to /login.
|
||||
response.StatusCode.ShouldNotBe(HttpStatusCode.Forbidden,
|
||||
$"FleetAdmin GET {route} must not be denied — FleetAdmin satisfies CanPublish");
|
||||
response.StatusCode.ShouldNotBe(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized,
|
||||
$"FleetAdmin GET {route} must not be denied");
|
||||
|
||||
// May be 200, 500 (DB error — not auth error), or a redirect within session.
|
||||
if (response.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.Redirect ||
|
||||
response.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.Found)
|
||||
{
|
||||
response.Headers.Location!.OriginalString.ShouldNotContain("/login",
|
||||
Case.Insensitive, $"FleetAdmin GET {route} must not be bounced to login");
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
response.StatusCode.ShouldBeOneOf(HttpStatusCode.OK, HttpStatusCode.NoContent);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ── (d) ConfigViewer is denied CanPublish pages ───────────────────────────────
|
||||
@@ -106,46 +109,6 @@ public sealed class AdminAuthPipelineTests : IClassFixture<AdminAuthPipelineTest
|
||||
HttpStatusCode.Redirect, HttpStatusCode.Found);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Theory]
|
||||
[MemberData(nameof(CanPublishPages))]
|
||||
public async Task FleetAdmin_is_permitted_CanPublish_gated_page(string route)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Sanity check: FleetAdmin must NOT be denied the same pages.
|
||||
using var client = _factory.CreateClientWithRoles(AdminRoles.FleetAdmin);
|
||||
|
||||
var response = await client.GetAsync(route);
|
||||
|
||||
response.StatusCode.ShouldNotBe(HttpStatusCode.Forbidden,
|
||||
$"FleetAdmin GET {route} must not be denied — FleetAdmin satisfies CanPublish");
|
||||
response.StatusCode.ShouldNotBe(HttpStatusCode.Unauthorized,
|
||||
$"FleetAdmin GET {route} must not be denied");
|
||||
|
||||
// May be 200 or a redirect within the authenticated session (not back to /login).
|
||||
if (response.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.Redirect ||
|
||||
response.StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.Found)
|
||||
{
|
||||
response.Headers.Location!.OriginalString.ShouldNotContain("/login",
|
||||
Case.Insensitive, $"FleetAdmin GET {route} must not be bounced to login");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ── (c) Authenticated-then-authorized round-trip ──────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
public async Task Authenticated_FleetAdmin_session_can_access_homepage()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// The login -> cookie issuance is covered by AuthEndpointsTests.
|
||||
// This test confirms that a session with the cookie (simulated here by the
|
||||
// RoleInjectingHandler) can retrieve the protected home page.
|
||||
using var client = _factory.CreateClientWithRoles(AdminRoles.FleetAdmin);
|
||||
|
||||
var response = await client.GetAsync("/");
|
||||
|
||||
response.StatusCode.ShouldNotBe(HttpStatusCode.Forbidden,
|
||||
"a FleetAdmin with a valid session must not be denied the homepage");
|
||||
response.StatusCode.ShouldBeOneOf(HttpStatusCode.OK, HttpStatusCode.NoContent);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ── WebApplicationFactory plumbing ───────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
@@ -153,14 +116,37 @@ public sealed class AdminAuthPipelineTests : IClassFixture<AdminAuthPipelineTest
|
||||
/// authentication scheme with a custom handler that stamps requests with a
|
||||
/// caller-supplied role set. Tests obtain a per-role <see cref="HttpClient"/> via
|
||||
/// <see cref="CreateClientWithRoles"/>.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// Role injection works through a singleton <see cref="RoleContext"/> that holds a
|
||||
/// simple <c>lock</c>-protected field. This avoids the <c>AsyncLocal</c>-does-not-flow-
|
||||
/// into-TestServer pitfall and the stale-<c>[ThreadStatic]</c> pitfall.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
public sealed class RoleInjectingAppFactory : WebApplicationFactory<Program>
|
||||
{
|
||||
// ThreadLocal so parallel tests get independent role contexts.
|
||||
[ThreadStatic] internal static string[]? CurrentRoles;
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// Singleton shared by the factory and the <see cref="RoleInjectingHandler"/>.
|
||||
/// Holds the roles that the next request should authenticate as.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
internal sealed class RoleContext
|
||||
{
|
||||
private readonly Lock _lock = new();
|
||||
private string[] _roles = [];
|
||||
|
||||
public void SetRoles(string[] roles) { lock (_lock) { _roles = roles; } }
|
||||
public void Clear() { lock (_lock) { _roles = []; } }
|
||||
public string[] GetRoles() { lock (_lock) { return _roles; } }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Initialized here so it is available before CreateHost is invoked (the factory
|
||||
// builds the host lazily on first client creation; _roleContext must not be null
|
||||
// at CreateClientWithRoles() time, and the singleton registered in CreateHost
|
||||
// must be the same instance as this field).
|
||||
private readonly RoleContext _roleContext = new();
|
||||
|
||||
protected override IHost CreateHost(IHostBuilder builder)
|
||||
{
|
||||
var ctx = _roleContext;
|
||||
|
||||
builder.ConfigureServices(services =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Remove the background poller: it would start a DB poll loop that fails
|
||||
@@ -174,20 +160,20 @@ public sealed class AdminAuthPipelineTests : IClassFixture<AdminAuthPipelineTest
|
||||
if (ldap is not null) services.Remove(ldap);
|
||||
services.AddScoped<ILdapAuthService, NullLdapAuthService>();
|
||||
|
||||
// Replace the cookie scheme with the role-injecting test scheme.
|
||||
// The fallback policy and CanEdit/CanPublish role policies registered in
|
||||
// Program.cs are preserved — only the authentication handler is swapped.
|
||||
var cookieDescriptor = services.SingleOrDefault(d =>
|
||||
d.ServiceType == typeof(IConfigureOptions<CookieAuthenticationOptions>));
|
||||
// We replace the whole authentication registration so scheme resolution
|
||||
// still works for authorization checks.
|
||||
var authSchemeProvider = services.SingleOrDefault(d =>
|
||||
d.ServiceType == typeof(Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authentication.IAuthenticationSchemeProvider));
|
||||
if (authSchemeProvider is not null) services.Remove(authSchemeProvider);
|
||||
// Register the shared RoleContext as a singleton so the handler can read it.
|
||||
services.AddSingleton(ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
services.AddAuthentication(RoleInjectingHandler.SchemeName)
|
||||
// Register the role-injecting test scheme and override the default schemes.
|
||||
services.AddAuthentication()
|
||||
.AddScheme<AuthenticationSchemeOptions, RoleInjectingHandler>(
|
||||
RoleInjectingHandler.SchemeName, _ => { });
|
||||
|
||||
services.PostConfigure<AuthenticationOptions>(opt =>
|
||||
{
|
||||
opt.DefaultAuthenticateScheme = RoleInjectingHandler.SchemeName;
|
||||
opt.DefaultChallengeScheme = RoleInjectingHandler.SchemeName;
|
||||
opt.DefaultForbidScheme = RoleInjectingHandler.SchemeName;
|
||||
});
|
||||
});
|
||||
return base.CreateHost(builder);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -198,28 +184,28 @@ public sealed class AdminAuthPipelineTests : IClassFixture<AdminAuthPipelineTest
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
public HttpClient CreateClientWithRoles(params string[] roles)
|
||||
{
|
||||
RoleInjectingAppFactory.CurrentRoles = roles;
|
||||
_roleContext!.SetRoles(roles);
|
||||
return CreateClient(new WebApplicationFactoryClientOptions { AllowAutoRedirect = false });
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// <summary>
|
||||
/// Authentication handler that stamps the current request with the roles stored in
|
||||
/// <see cref="RoleInjectingAppFactory.CurrentRoles"/>. When <c>CurrentRoles</c> is
|
||||
/// null/empty the request is unauthenticated (no ticket).
|
||||
/// the <see cref="RoleInjectingAppFactory.RoleContext"/> singleton.
|
||||
/// </summary>
|
||||
private sealed class RoleInjectingHandler(
|
||||
IOptionsMonitor<AuthenticationSchemeOptions> options,
|
||||
ILoggerFactory logger,
|
||||
UrlEncoder encoder)
|
||||
UrlEncoder encoder,
|
||||
RoleInjectingAppFactory.RoleContext roleContext)
|
||||
: AuthenticationHandler<AuthenticationSchemeOptions>(options, logger, encoder)
|
||||
{
|
||||
public const string SchemeName = "RoleInjecting";
|
||||
|
||||
protected override Task<AuthenticateResult> HandleAuthenticateAsync()
|
||||
{
|
||||
var roles = RoleInjectingAppFactory.CurrentRoles;
|
||||
if (roles is null || roles.Length == 0)
|
||||
var roles = roleContext.GetRoles();
|
||||
if (roles.Length == 0)
|
||||
return Task.FromResult(AuthenticateResult.NoResult());
|
||||
|
||||
var claims = new List<Claim>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -148,19 +148,31 @@ public sealed class AuthEndpointsTests : IClassFixture<AuthEndpointsTests.Stubbe
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
[Fact]
|
||||
public async Task Logout_without_antiforgery_token_is_rejected()
|
||||
public async Task Logout_with_valid_session_but_no_antiforgery_token_is_rejected()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// Admin-006: the logout endpoint no longer calls .DisableAntiforgery(), so the
|
||||
// UseAntiforgery() middleware must reject a POST that carries no token with 400.
|
||||
// This regression guards against CSRF-logout (attacker tricking the browser into
|
||||
// signing the operator out by posting to /auth/logout from a foreign origin).
|
||||
// This regression guards against CSRF-logout (attacker tricking the operator's
|
||||
// already-authenticated browser into posting to /auth/logout from a foreign origin).
|
||||
//
|
||||
// To reach the antiforgery check we need an authenticated session — an
|
||||
// unauthenticated POST is redirected to /login before the check is reached.
|
||||
// We obtain the auth cookie via a valid /auth/login round-trip first.
|
||||
using var client = _factory.CreateNonRedirectingClient();
|
||||
|
||||
var response = await client.PostAsync("/auth/logout",
|
||||
// Step 1: log in to get the session cookie.
|
||||
var loginResponse = await client.PostAsync("/auth/login",
|
||||
Form(("username", "good"), ("password", "pw")));
|
||||
loginResponse.StatusCode.ShouldBeOneOf(HttpStatusCode.Redirect, HttpStatusCode.Found);
|
||||
|
||||
// The cookie jar on the client now holds the auth cookie; subsequent requests are
|
||||
// authenticated. Step 2: POST to /auth/logout without an antiforgery token.
|
||||
var logoutResponse = await client.PostAsync("/auth/logout",
|
||||
new FormUrlEncodedContent(Array.Empty<KeyValuePair<string, string>>()));
|
||||
|
||||
response.StatusCode.ShouldBe(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest,
|
||||
"/auth/logout without an antiforgery token must be rejected (Admin-006)");
|
||||
// The antiforgery middleware must reject the missing token with 400.
|
||||
logoutResponse.StatusCode.ShouldBe(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest,
|
||||
"/auth/logout from an authenticated session without an antiforgery token must be rejected (Admin-006)");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// ── Admin-003: SignalR hubs reject anonymous connections ────────────────────
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user