docs(archreview): cross-reference historiangw#11 for the Int1 EnsureTags gap

archreview/plans/STATUS.md

@@ -331,7 +331,9 @@ convention) + a regression unit test + `StorageRateMs` on the live-suite inline
   gateway's histsdk on this historian**: `EnsureTags(Int1)` returns `ProtocolEvidenceMissingException` (the vendored
   client's "no capture evidence for this type" guard → gRPC `Unimplemented`), both fresh and as a retype target.
   A **type sweep** confirmed it is Int1-specific: **Int2/UInt2/Int4/UInt4/Float/Double all provision `success=True`;
-  only Int1 fails.** This is a **gateway/histsdk type-support gap**, not an OtOpcUa defect.
+  only Int1 fails.** Root cause: `histsdk` `HistorianTagWriteProtocol.GetAnalogDataTypeCode` has no captured
+  CTagMetadata wire code for Int1. This is a **gateway/histsdk type-support gap**, not an OtOpcUa defect — **filed as
+  [historiangw#11](https://gitea.dohertylan.com/dohertj2/historiangw/issues/11)**.
 
 **✅ U-7 retype policy — ANSWERED (via `grpcurl` against the real historian):**
 - `EnsureTags` is a **real create-or-update upsert** — re-`EnsureTags` of an existing tag at the same type → `success`.