feat(security): register TimeProvider + S18/S19 option knobs (archreview 03/S18,S19)

tests/Server/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Host.Tests/Configuration/MeshRegistrationRoleScopingTests.cs

@@ -236,8 +236,10 @@ public sealed class MeshRegistrationRoleScopingTests
     }
 
     /// <summary>
-    ///     Pins the scanner's expected result shape against today's Program.cs — 6 markers,
-    ///     5 braced blocks + the 1 braceless ConfigDb gate, so 6 scanned ranges. Without this, a
+    ///     Pins the scanner's expected result shape against today's Program.cs — 5 markers,
+    ///     4 braced blocks + the 1 braceless ConfigDb gate, so 5 scanned ranges (the data-plane
+    ///     key-store branch moved into <c>DataPlaneAuthRegistration</c> for arch-review 03/S18, taking
+    ///     one braced marker with it). Without this, a
     ///     scanner bug that silently drops or merges a marker (as the pre-fix version did to the
     ///     braceless marker — it fabricated a phantom range spanning an unrelated if-block and swallowed
     ///     a real nested 'if (hasAdmin)' block inside it, yielding 5 ranges instead of 6) would not
@@ -248,13 +250,13 @@ public sealed class MeshRegistrationRoleScopingTests
     {
         var source = ReadProgramSource();
 
-        CountOccurrences(source, HasAdminMarker).ShouldBe(6,
+        CountOccurrences(source, HasAdminMarker).ShouldBe(5,
             "Program.cs's 'if (hasAdmin)' marker count changed. If a marker was added or removed, " +
             "update this pin — and check whether the new/removed occurrence is braced or braceless — " +
             "rather than letting the scanner silently mis-shape its result.");
 
         var ranges = FindHasAdminBlockRanges(source);
-        ranges.Count.ShouldBe(6,
+        ranges.Count.ShouldBe(5,
             "expected one scanned range per 'if (hasAdmin)' marker, including the braceless ConfigDb " +
             "gate. A mismatch means the scanner adopted an unrelated brace or otherwise merged/dropped " +
             "a marker instead of handling each one independently.");