# Code Review — Core.Abstractions

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Module | `src/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Core.Abstractions` |
| Reviewer | Claude Code |
| Review date | 2026-05-22 |
| Commit reviewed | `76d35d1` |
| Status | Reviewed |
| Open findings | 5 |

## Checklist coverage

A comprehensive review completes every category, recording "No issues found" where
a category produced nothing rather than leaving it blank.

| # | Category | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Correctness & logic bugs | Core.Abstractions-001, Core.Abstractions-002 |
| 2 | OtOpcUa conventions | No issues found |
| 3 | Concurrency & thread safety | Core.Abstractions-003, Core.Abstractions-004 |
| 4 | Error handling & resilience | Core.Abstractions-005 |
| 5 | Security | No issues found |
| 6 | Performance & resource management | No issues found |
| 7 | Design-document adherence | No issues found |
| 8 | Code organization & conventions | Core.Abstractions-006 |
| 9 | Testing coverage | Core.Abstractions-007 |
| 10 | Documentation & comments | Core.Abstractions-008 |

## Findings

### Core.Abstractions-001

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Severity | Medium |
| Category | Correctness & logic bugs |
| Location | `src/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Core.Abstractions/PollGroupEngine.cs:112` |
| Status | Resolved |

**Description:** `PollOnceAsync` detects a change with `!Equals(lastSeen?.Value, current.Value)`. `object.Equals` falls back to reference equality for reference types that do not override it — including `T[]` array values. The capability interfaces explicitly support 1-D array attributes (`DriverAttributeInfo.IsArray`, `ValueRank=1`), and a driver's batch reader produces a fresh array instance on every poll. As a result every poll of an array-valued tag is treated as a change, so `OnDataChange` fires on every tick regardless of whether the array contents actually changed. This produces spurious data-change notifications and unnecessary OPC UA monitored-item publishes for any poll-based driver (Modbus, S7, AB CIP, FOCAS) that exposes array tags.

**Recommendation:** Compare array values structurally — e.g. when both `lastSeen?.Value` and `current.Value` are arrays, compare with `StructuralComparisons.StructuralEqualityComparer.Equals` (or element-wise) — instead of relying on `object.Equals`. Add a test covering an array-valued tag whose contents are unchanged across polls.

**Resolution:** Resolved 2026-05-22 — introduced `ValuesAreDifferent` helper in `PollGroupEngine` that uses `StructuralComparisons.StructuralEqualityComparer` for `Array` values, falling back to `object.Equals` for scalars; added `Array_valued_tag_unchanged_contents_raises_only_once` and `Array_valued_tag_changed_contents_raises_event` tests.

### Core.Abstractions-002

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Severity | Medium |
| Category | Correctness & logic bugs |
| Location | `src/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Core.Abstractions/PollGroupEngine.cs:105-109` |
| Status | Resolved |

**Description:** `PollOnceAsync` iterates `state.TagReferences` and indexes the reader's result with `snapshots[i]`, assuming the driver-supplied `_reader` delegate returns exactly one snapshot per input reference in input order. The contract is documented (ctor XML doc: "snapshots MUST be returned in the same order as the input references"), but it is never validated. A reader that returns a shorter list — a plausible driver bug, or a partial result on a backend error — throws `ArgumentOutOfRangeException` from the indexer. That exception escapes `PollOnceAsync`, is swallowed by the catch-all in `PollLoopAsync` (line 99), and the subscription then silently produces no further `OnDataChange` callbacks for the rest of its lifetime with no diagnostic. The failure mode is a permanently stalled subscription that looks healthy.

**Recommendation:** Validate `snapshots.Count == state.TagReferences.Count` at the top of `PollOnceAsync` and throw a descriptive exception (or skip the tick with a logged diagnostic) so the contract violation is visible rather than silently degrading. Consider surfacing repeated reader-contract failures through a callback the driver can route to its health surface.

**Resolution:** Resolved 2026-05-22 — added count-guard at the top of `PollOnceAsync` that throws `InvalidOperationException` with a descriptive message when the reader returns the wrong number of snapshots; added `Reader_short_result_list_raises_descriptive_exception_and_loop_continues` test verifying the loop survives contract violations and resumes delivering events once the reader recovers.

### Core.Abstractions-003

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Severity | Medium |
| Category | Concurrency & thread safety |
| Location | `src/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Core.Abstractions/PollGroupEngine.cs:64,121-130` |
| Status | Resolved |

**Description:** `Subscribe` starts the poll loop with a fire-and-forget `Task.Run` and keeps no reference to the returned `Task`. Neither `Unsubscribe` nor `DisposeAsync` awaits the loop's completion — they only cancel the `CancellationTokenSource` and dispose it. Two consequences:

1. After `DisposeAsync`/`Unsubscribe` returns, a poll already in flight inside `PollOnceAsync` can still complete and invoke the `_onChange` callback. A driver that disposes the engine during shutdown can therefore receive a data-change callback after it considers the engine torn down, with no way to know the engine is gone.
2. `Unsubscribe`/`DisposeAsync` call `state.Cts.Dispose()` immediately while the loop may still be inside `Task.Delay(state.Interval, ct)`. Cancelling-then-disposing a CTS while a consumer still touches the token can race; `Task.Delay` on a disposed token can throw `ObjectDisposedException` rather than `OperationCanceledException`, which the `Task.Delay` await in `PollLoopAsync` does not catch (it catches only `OperationCanceledException`).

**Recommendation:** Track each loop `Task` in `SubscriptionState` and await it (with a timeout) in `Unsubscribe`/`DisposeAsync` before disposing the CTS, so disposal is deterministic and no callback can fire after teardown. At minimum, defer `Cts.Dispose()` until the loop task has observed cancellation, or wrap the `Task.Delay` await to also tolerate `ObjectDisposedException`.

**Resolution:** Resolved 2026-05-22 — stored the loop `Task` in `SubscriptionState.LoopTask`; `Unsubscribe` calls `StopState` which cancels then awaits the task (5 s timeout) before disposing the CTS; `DisposeAsync` cancels all loops in parallel then awaits them all via `Task.WhenAll` with a 5 s timeout before disposing CTSs, making teardown deterministic and preventing post-disposal callbacks.

### Core.Abstractions-004

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Severity | Low |
| Category | Concurrency & thread safety |
| Location | `src/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Core.Abstractions/DriverTypeRegistry.cs:23-40` |
| Status | Open |

**Description:** `Register` performs a check-then-act sequence (`snapshot.ContainsKey` then build `next` then `Interlocked.Exchange`) that is not atomic. Two threads registering concurrently can both pass the duplicate check and both build a `next` dictionary; the second `Interlocked.Exchange` then wins and silently discards the first registration, defeating the documented "registered only once" guarantee. The class XML doc states registration happens single-threaded at startup, so this is not a live defect — but the use of `Interlocked.Exchange` for the swap implies the type is fully thread-safe for writers, which it is not. The mismatch between the implementation's apparent intent and its actual guarantee is a maintenance hazard.

**Recommendation:** Either guard `Register` with a `lock` so the check-build-swap is atomic, or strengthen the XML `Thread-safety` remark to state explicitly that concurrent `Register` calls are unsupported and only reader/writer concurrency is safe.

**Resolution:** _(open)_

### Core.Abstractions-005

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Severity | Low |
| Category | Error handling & resilience |
| Location | `src/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Core.Abstractions/PollGroupEngine.cs:90,99` |
| Status | Open |

**Description:** Both the initial-poll and steady-state catch blocks use a bare `catch { }` that swallows every exception type, including non-transient programmer errors such as `NullReferenceException` and `ArgumentOutOfRangeException` (see Core.Abstractions-002). The XML remark says "transient poll error — loop continues, driver health surface logs it", but the engine never actually notifies the driver — there is no callback or event for a caught exception, so the driver's health surface has nothing to log. A persistently failing reader produces a silently spinning loop with zero observability from inside this module.

**Recommendation:** Narrow the catch to the exception types a reader is expected to throw (or at least exclude obviously-fatal ones), and add an optional `Action<Exception>` error callback (or raise an event) so the owning driver can record poll failures on its health surface as the doc claims happens.

**Resolution:** _(open)_

### Core.Abstractions-006

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Severity | Low |
| Category | Code organization & conventions |
| Location | `src/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Core.Abstractions/IHistoryProvider.cs:63,84-86`, `src/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Core.Abstractions/Historian/IHistorianDataSource.cs:30,63` |
| Status | Open |

**Description:** The two history-read surfaces use inconsistent integer types for the same "maximum rows" concept. `IHistoryProvider.ReadRawAsync` and `IHistorianDataSource.ReadRawAsync` take `uint maxValuesPerNode`, but `ReadEventsAsync` (on both interfaces) takes `int maxEvents`. The OPC UA `HistoryRead` service request fields are unsigned, and a negative `maxEvents` has no defined meaning. Mixing `int` and `uint` for the same parameter role across sibling methods forces every caller and implementer to reason about the inconsistency and risks accidental sign issues at the boundary.

**Recommendation:** Standardize on `uint` for all max-rows parameters across both `IHistoryProvider` and `IHistorianDataSource` (or document explicitly why `maxEvents` differs).

**Resolution:** _(open)_

### Core.Abstractions-007

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Severity | Low |
| Category | Testing coverage |
| Location | `tests/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Core.Abstractions.Tests/PollGroupEngineTests.cs` |
| Status | Open |

**Description:** `PollGroupEngine` is the only behavioural (non-DTO) type in the module and its tests, while solid for the happy paths, miss two paths that this review identifies as defect-prone: (a) no test exercises an array-valued tag whose contents are unchanged across polls (would catch Core.Abstractions-001), and (b) no test exercises a reader that returns a snapshot list shorter than the input references (would catch Core.Abstractions-002). The `Reader_exception_does_not_crash_loop` test only covers a reader that throws before producing any result. `DataValueSnapshot` change-detection semantics for reference-typed values are therefore unverified.

**Recommendation:** Add tests for the unchanged-array case and the short-result-list case once Core.Abstractions-001/002 are addressed, so the intended contract is locked down.

**Resolution:** _(open)_

### Core.Abstractions-008

| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Severity | Low |
| Category | Documentation & comments |
| Location | `src/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Core.Abstractions/DriverHealth.cs:9`, `src/Core/ZB.MOM.WW.OtOpcUa.Core.Abstractions/IHistoryProvider.cs:39-43,65-69` |
| Status | Open |

**Description:** Two XML-doc inaccuracies:

1. `DriverHealth.LastError` is documented as "Most recent error message; null when state is Healthy." The `DriverState` enum also defines `Degraded`, `Reconnecting`, and `Faulted` states, all of which carry an error; and a driver in `Healthy` state may legitimately retain the last error from a previously-recovered failure. The "null when Healthy" claim is stronger than the type enforces and than callers should rely on.
2. `IHistoryProvider.ReadAtTimeAsync` and `ReadEventsAsync` are C# default interface methods whose `<remarks>` say "Default implementation throws". This is accurate, but the sibling `IHistorianDataSource` declares the same methods as required (non-default) members — the asymmetry between the two history surfaces is undocumented and could surprise an implementer who assumes parity.

**Recommendation:** Reword `DriverHealth.LastError` to "Most recent error message; may be null when no error has been recorded" without tying nullness to a specific state. Add a one-line note on `IHistoryProvider`/`IHistorianDataSource` explaining why one surface uses default methods and the other does not.

**Resolution:** _(open)_
