Files
chat/chat/services/interjection.py
T
2026-04-26 15:51:29 -04:00

101 lines
3.9 KiB
Python

"""Interjection classifier service (T39).
Per Requirements §6.2, when a guest is present and the addressee bot has
just spoken, the *non-addressee* bot may follow on with a brief
interjection beat. This service decides whether that interjection
fires. Conservative bias: most turns return ``should_interject=False``
— the addressee has the floor and an interjection is the exception.
Trigger ``True`` only when the silent witness's character, given their
persona and edges, would plausibly speak up: jealousy, surprise, strong
agreement worth voicing, correcting a factual falsehood, urgency.
T44 (turn flow) calls this and, on ``True``, generates the brief
follow-on response as the silent witness. Classifier failure falls back
to ``should_interject=False`` with ``reason="fallback"`` so the chat
keeps moving (§3.3 graceful-degradation rule); callers that care can
distinguish a real "no" from a degraded "no" by the reason string.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from pydantic import BaseModel
from chat.llm.classify import classify
from chat.llm.client import LLMClient
class InterjectionDecision(BaseModel):
"""Whether the silent witness interjects, plus a short reason.
Defaults are a deliberate no-op: ``should_interject=False`` with an
empty reason. The classifier-failure fallback uses
``reason="fallback"`` so it's distinguishable from a real "no".
"""
should_interject: bool = False
reason: str = ""
_SYSTEM = (
"You decide whether a silent witness character interjects after the "
"addressee character finishes speaking. STRONGLY default to false — "
"the addressee has the floor and most turns should NOT have an "
"interjection. Only return true when the silent witness's character, "
"given their persona and edges, would plausibly speak up: jealousy, "
"surprise, strong agreement worth voicing, correcting a factual "
"falsehood, urgency. Output strict JSON matching the schema."
)
async def detect_interjection(
client: LLMClient,
*,
classifier_model: str,
addressee_name: str,
addressee_just_said: str,
silent_witness_name: str,
silent_witness_persona: str,
silent_witness_edge_to_addressee: dict, # {affinity, trust, summary}
silent_witness_edge_to_you: dict,
you_just_said: str,
timeout_s: float = 30.0,
) -> InterjectionDecision:
"""Decide whether the silent witness bot interjects after the addressee
finishes speaking.
The two ``silent_witness_edge_*`` dicts carry the silent witness's
directed edges toward the addressee and toward the user ("you"),
each shaped ``{affinity: int, trust: int, summary: str}``. Missing
keys fall back to a 50/50 baseline with an empty summary so this
function tolerates partially-populated edge state without raising.
"""
user = (
f"You said: {you_just_said}\n\n"
f"{addressee_name} just said: {addressee_just_said}\n\n"
f"Silent witness: {silent_witness_name}\n"
f"Persona: {silent_witness_persona}\n"
f"Edge {silent_witness_name} -> {addressee_name}: "
f"affinity={silent_witness_edge_to_addressee.get('affinity', 50)}, "
f"trust={silent_witness_edge_to_addressee.get('trust', 50)}, "
f"summary={silent_witness_edge_to_addressee.get('summary', '')}\n"
f"Edge {silent_witness_name} -> you: "
f"affinity={silent_witness_edge_to_you.get('affinity', 50)}, "
f"trust={silent_witness_edge_to_you.get('trust', 50)}, "
f"summary={silent_witness_edge_to_you.get('summary', '')}\n\n"
f"Should {silent_witness_name} interject?"
)
return await classify(
client,
model=classifier_model,
system=_SYSTEM,
user=user,
schema=InterjectionDecision,
default=InterjectionDecision(
should_interject=False, reason="fallback"
),
timeout_s=timeout_s,
)
__all__ = ["InterjectionDecision", "detect_interjection"]