Files
chat/chat/state/memory.py
T

167 lines
6.0 KiB
Python

from __future__ import annotations
from sqlite3 import Connection
from chat.eventlog.projector import on
from chat.eventlog.log import Event
_VALID_WITNESS_ROLES = {"you", "host", "guest"}
def _row_to_dict(conn: Connection, row: tuple) -> dict:
cols = [c[1] for c in conn.execute("PRAGMA table_info(memories)").fetchall()]
return dict(zip(cols, row))
@on("memory_written")
def _apply_memory_written(conn: Connection, e: Event) -> None:
p = e.payload
conn.execute(
"INSERT INTO memories ("
"owner_id, chat_id, scene_id, pov_summary, "
"witness_you, witness_host, witness_guest, "
"chat_clock_at, source, reliability, significance, pinned, auto_pinned"
") VALUES (?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)",
(
p["owner_id"],
p["chat_id"],
p.get("scene_id"),
p["pov_summary"],
int(p["witness_you"]),
int(p["witness_host"]),
int(p["witness_guest"]),
p.get("chat_clock_at"),
p.get("source", "direct"),
float(p.get("reliability", 1.0)),
int(p.get("significance", 1)),
int(p.get("pinned", 0)),
int(p.get("auto_pinned", 0)),
),
)
@on("memory_significance_set")
def _apply_memory_significance_set(conn: Connection, e: Event) -> None:
"""Update an existing memory's significance score (T22).
Emitted by the async significance worker after it scores the turn.
"""
p = e.payload
conn.execute(
"UPDATE memories SET significance = ? WHERE id = ?",
(int(p["significance"]), int(p["memory_id"])),
)
@on("memory_pin_changed")
def _apply_memory_pin_changed(conn: Connection, e: Event) -> None:
"""Toggle a memory's pin state (T22, §8.5).
Used both for auto-pinning a pivotal turn and for evicting the oldest
auto-pin when the per-owner soft cap is exceeded. Manual pins use the
same handler; the ``auto_pinned`` flag distinguishes them so the
eviction query can leave manual pins alone.
"""
p = e.payload
conn.execute(
"UPDATE memories SET pinned = ?, auto_pinned = ? WHERE id = ?",
(int(p["pinned"]), int(p["auto_pinned"]), int(p["memory_id"])),
)
def get_memory(conn: Connection, memory_id: int) -> dict | None:
row = conn.execute(
"SELECT * FROM memories WHERE id = ?", (memory_id,)
).fetchone()
if not row:
return None
return _row_to_dict(conn, row)
def get_pinned(conn: Connection, owner_id: str) -> list[dict]:
cur = conn.execute(
"SELECT * FROM memories WHERE owner_id = ? AND pinned = 1 "
"ORDER BY created_at DESC, id DESC",
(owner_id,),
)
rows = cur.fetchall()
cols = [c[1] for c in conn.execute("PRAGMA table_info(memories)").fetchall()]
return [dict(zip(cols, row)) for row in rows]
# Composite-score weights used by ``search_memories`` (T23, §8 retrieval).
# FTS5 BM25 ``rank`` is *more negative* for better matches, so subtracting a
# positive boost from it drives stronger candidates further down (i.e. earlier
# in an ascending sort). Hardcoded for v1 — tunable in a later pass.
_SIGNIFICANCE_WEIGHT = 0.3
_RECENCY_WEIGHT = 0.5
def search_memories(
conn: Connection,
owner_id: str,
witness_role: str,
query: str,
k: int = 4,
) -> list[dict]:
"""FTS5 search over pov_summary, scoped by owner and witness role.
witness_role must be one of {"you", "host", "guest"} per the witness flags
on each memory row. Returns up to ``k`` rows ranked by a composite score
that combines the FTS5 BM25 rank with two boosts (§8 retrieval rules):
* **significance boost** — ``0.3 * significance`` (0..3 per §11.1).
* **recency boost** — ``0.5 * (id / max_id)``, using the row id as a
monotonic recency proxy. Newer memories therefore tilt above older ones
when the BM25 rank and significance are otherwise tied.
BM25 returns negative scores (lower = better). Both boosts are subtracted
so that stronger candidates yield smaller composite scores; the result is
sorted ascending and truncated to ``k``. The unmodified ``fts_rank`` and a
debug-friendly ``composite_score`` are kept on each returned dict.
"""
if witness_role not in _VALID_WITNESS_ROLES:
raise ValueError(
f"witness_role must be one of {sorted(_VALID_WITNESS_ROLES)}, "
f"got {witness_role!r}"
)
if not query.strip():
return []
witness_col = f"witness_{witness_role}"
cols = [c[1] for c in conn.execute("PRAGMA table_info(memories)").fetchall()]
select_list = ", ".join(f"m.{c}" for c in cols)
# Over-fetch from FTS so the Python-side re-rank has room to reorder
# results that BM25 alone would have demoted past the top-k boundary.
over_fetch = max(k * 4, 20)
sql = (
f"SELECT {select_list}, memories_fts.rank AS fts_rank "
"FROM memories_fts "
"JOIN memories m ON m.id = memories_fts.rowid "
f"WHERE m.owner_id = ? AND m.{witness_col} = 1 "
"AND memories_fts MATCH ? "
"ORDER BY memories_fts.rank "
"LIMIT ?"
)
cur = conn.execute(sql, (owner_id, query, over_fetch))
rows = cur.fetchall()
if not rows:
return []
# Recency normalises against the current max id for this owner so the
# boost magnitude is bounded regardless of dataset size.
max_id_row = conn.execute(
"SELECT MAX(id) FROM memories WHERE owner_id = ?", (owner_id,)
).fetchone()
max_id = max_id_row[0] if max_id_row and max_id_row[0] else 1
result_cols = cols + ["fts_rank"]
enriched: list[dict] = []
for row in rows:
d = dict(zip(result_cols, row))
fts_rank = d.get("fts_rank") or 0.0
sig_boost = _SIGNIFICANCE_WEIGHT * (d.get("significance") or 0)
recency_boost = _RECENCY_WEIGHT * ((d.get("id") or 0) / max_id)
d["composite_score"] = fts_rank - sig_boost - recency_boost
enriched.append(d)
enriched.sort(key=lambda x: x["composite_score"])
return enriched[:k]