Measured the unbounded purge burst and found it can force a full ten-table
snapshot resync, then bounded it. No purge-exemption path was added — the
deletes are still CDC-captured like any other write, which stays ruled out
by design; what changed is how many a single tick performs.
MEASURED (harness: real EventLogPurgeService over a real LocalDb file with
site_events genuinely RegisterReplicated, plus a two-node loopback gRPC
replication pair; docker rig untouched):
393 bytes/row incl. indexes => a 1 GB event log holds ~2,731,947 rows.
Expiring all of them in ONE tick: 285 s, 2,731,947 oplog rows,
284 MB oplog payload, 2.73 M row-version tombstones (7-day retention),
i.e. 2.7x LocalDb's MaxOplogRows default of 1,000,000. Crossing that makes
the 60 s maintenance tick prune the oplog and set needs_snapshot — a FULL
snapshot of all ten replicated tables, bought by a routine retention purge.
The resident backlog is produced-minus-drained, so a healthy peer blunts it:
on loopback the same burst peaked at 391,424 and cleared in 6.0 min. That is
the problem, not the reassurance — the old safety margin was a function of
peer throughput and vanished with the peer down. A bounded tick is safe at
any peer speed.
Drain is not a bottleneck: 7.6k-19.8k tombstones/s (20k / 500k / 2.73M runs).
SHIPPED:
- SiteEventLogOptions.MaxPurgedRowsPerTick (default 250,000; 0 = unlimited
escape hatch, negatives rejected). One SHARED budget across the retention
purge and the cap trim — two independently-capped phases would let a tick
emit twice the intended burst. 4x margin under MaxOplogRows, which is also
shared with every other replicated table's ordinary traffic.
- SiteEventLogOptions.PurgeCatchUpInterval (default 5 min, validated > 0 and
<= PurgeInterval). Without it pacing would make retention converge in 11
DAYS at the daily cadence; with it the worst case converges in ~11 ticks
(~55 min), every burst bounded. 5 min rather than 1 so ticks cannot outrun
the peer's drain and re-accumulate the backlog.
- A ceiling is claimed only when work genuinely remains (bounded EXISTS probe),
so an expired set landing exactly on the budget does not arm a no-op retry.
- Visibility: rate-limited (15 min) Warning naming the ceiling and the
accelerated interval, plus an unthrottled counter
scadabridge.site.event_log.purge_ceiling_hits — its SHAPE distinguishes a
backlog converging from a site whose event rate outruns one paced tick.
- The purge loop is a delay loop rather than a PeriodicTimer, so its cadence
now anchors to the END of the previous purge. Documented.
ROW-33 INTERPLAY VERIFIED: pacing lowers each spike and lengthens total purge
duration, but a full 250k tick drains in ~23 s (~4 min even at 10x a real
link's penalty) against the 15-minute sustained dwell and a 5-minute gap to
the next tick. The UNPACED 2.73M burst had only 2.5x of margin (6.0 min), so
pacing makes the badge assumption robust rather than merely preserving it.
Docs travel together: Component-SiteEventLogging.md, topology-guide.md
("Reading the replication backlog" + the row-33 badge note), CLAUDE.md's
purge-burst sentence, and a dated measurement/decision note under docs/plans/.
Fail-before: the new behavioural tests do not compile against the pre-fix
service (RunPurge was void); with PurgeBudget neutralised to always-unlimited,
6 of the new tests fail and all 19 pre-existing ones pass.
Tests: SiteEventLogging 93/93, Commons 715/715, HealthMonitoring 115/115,
Host 505/505. Solution build clean.
25 KiB
ScadaBridge Cluster Topology Guide
Architecture Overview
ScadaBridge uses a hub-and-spoke architecture:
- Central Cluster: Two-node active/standby Akka.NET cluster for management, UI, and coordination.
- Site Clusters: Two-node active/standby Akka.NET clusters at each remote site for data collection and local processing.
%%{init: {'theme':'base', 'themeVariables': {'textColor':'#111111','lineColor':'#555555','edgeLabelBackground':'#ffffff','fontSize':'15px'}}}%%
flowchart TD
USERS["Users<br/>(HTTPS / LB)"]
subgraph CENTRAL["Central Cluster"]
NA["Node A<br/>Active"]
NB["Node B<br/>Standby"]
NA <--> NB
end
USERS --> NA
CENTRAL --> SITE01
CENTRAL --> SITE02
CENTRAL --> SITE03
CENTRAL --> SITEN
subgraph SITE01["Site 01"]
S01A["A<br/>Active"]
S01B["B<br/>Standby"]
end
subgraph SITE02["Site 02"]
S02A["A<br/>Active"]
S02B["B<br/>Standby"]
end
subgraph SITE03["Site 03"]
S03A["A<br/>Active"]
S03B["B<br/>Standby"]
end
subgraph SITEN["Site N"]
SNA["A<br/>Active"]
SNB["B<br/>Standby"]
end
classDef start fill:#d5e8d4,stroke:#82b366,color:#111111;
classDef proc fill:#dae8fc,stroke:#6c8ebf,color:#111111;
classDef dec fill:#fff2cc,stroke:#d6b656,color:#111111;
classDef warn fill:#ffe6cc,stroke:#d79b00,color:#111111;
classDef muted fill:#f5f5f5,stroke:#999999,color:#666666;
class USERS dec
class CENTRAL proc
class NA,S01A,S02A,S03A,SNA start
class NB,S01B,S02B,S03B,SNB muted
class SITE01,SITE02,SITE03,SITEN warn
Central Cluster Setup
Cluster Configuration
Both central nodes must be configured as seed nodes for each other:
Node A (central-01.example.com):
{
"ScadaBridge": {
"Node": {
"Role": "Central",
"NodeHostname": "central-01.example.com",
"RemotingPort": 8081
},
"Cluster": {
"SeedNodes": [
"akka.tcp://scadabridge@central-01.example.com:8081",
"akka.tcp://scadabridge@central-02.example.com:8081"
]
}
}
}
Node B (central-02.example.com):
{
"ScadaBridge": {
"Node": {
"Role": "Central",
"NodeHostname": "central-02.example.com",
"RemotingPort": 8081
},
"Cluster": {
"SeedNodes": [
"akka.tcp://scadabridge@central-02.example.com:8081",
"akka.tcp://scadabridge@central-01.example.com:8081"
]
}
}
}
Seed order is load-bearing — each node lists ITSELF first (decision 2026-07-22). Note Node B's list is the reverse of Node A's. Akka only lets
seed-nodes[0]form a new cluster, so a node listing its partner first can never boot while that partner is down.StartupValidatorrejects the boot if the ordering is wrong, comparing host and port; use the same spelling of the hostname inNodeHostnameand in the seed URI, since Akka does no DNS canonicalisation (central-02andcentral-02.example.comare different seed identities). Seedocs/requirements/Component-ClusterInfrastructure.md→ Seed Node Ordering.
Cluster Behavior
- Split-brain resolver:
auto-down(AutoDowningprovider,auto-down-unreachable-after= 15s) since the 2026-07-21 availability-over-partition-safety decision — the leader among the reachable members downs the unreachable peer, so a hard crash of either node fails over. Accepted trade: a real partition leaves both sides active until an operator restarts one.keep-oldest(withdown-if-alone = on) remains a supportedSplitBrainResolverStrategyvalue, but in a two-node cluster it cannot survive a crash of the oldest node. Seedocs/plans/2026-07-21-auto-down-availability-decision.md. - Minimum members:
min-nr-of-members = 1— a single node can form a cluster. - Failure detection: 2-second heartbeat interval, 10-second threshold.
- Total failover time: ~25 seconds from node failure to singleton migration.
- Singleton handover: Uses CoordinatedShutdown for graceful migration.
Shared State
Both central nodes share state through:
- SQL Server: All configuration, deployment records, templates, and audit logs.
- JWT signing key: Same
JwtSigningKeyin both nodes' configuration. - Data Protection keys: Shared key ring (stored in SQL Server or shared file path).
Load Balancer
A load balancer sits in front of both central nodes for the Blazor Server UI:
- Health check:
GET /health/ready - Protocol: HTTPS (TLS termination at LB or pass-through)
- Sticky sessions: Not required (JWT + shared Data Protection keys)
- If the active node fails, the LB routes to the standby (which becomes active after singleton migration).
Site Cluster Setup
Cluster Configuration
Each site has its own two-node cluster:
Site Node A (site-01-a.example.com):
{
"ScadaBridge": {
"Node": {
"Role": "Site",
"NodeHostname": "site-01-a.example.com",
"SiteId": "plant-north",
"RemotingPort": 8081
},
"Cluster": {
"SeedNodes": [
"akka.tcp://scadabridge@site-01-a.example.com:8081",
"akka.tcp://scadabridge@site-01-b.example.com:8081"
]
}
}
}
Site Node B reverses this list —
site-01-bfirst,site-01-asecond — per the self-first seed rule above. It applies to site pairs exactly as it does to the central pair: without it,site-01-bcannot boot whilesite-01-ais down.
Site Cluster Behavior
- Same split-brain resolver as central (
auto-down, per the 2026-07-21 decision — see the Central Cluster Behavior note above). - Singleton actors: Site Deployment Manager migrates on failover.
- Staggered instance startup: 50ms delay between Instance Actor creation to prevent reconnection storms.
- SQLite persistence: each node owns its own consolidated LocalDb database, kept in step by asynchronous CDC replication over a gRPC sync stream (LocalDb Phase 1 + 2). The nodes do NOT share a SQLite file.
- CDC capture triggers are installed only on a node that has replication configured —
LocalDb:Replication:PeerAddressorLocalDb:Replication:ApiKey. Either key counts, because only the initiating half of a pair setsPeerAddress(one bidirectional stream, dialled by one side); the passive half carries the key alone. A deliberately unreplicated node — site-b and site-c on the rig — runs with no triggers at all and stops paying the per-write capture cost. - Stale-trigger cleanup is automatic (LocalDb 0.2.0). A node with no replication configured does
not merely skip registration — at boot it calls
DeregisterReplicatedon all ten tables, dropping any capture triggers an earlier build installed and pruning those tables' oplog and row-version rows. It is idempotent, so a file that was never registered reports nothing to clean; when something was cleaned the node logs it once at Information. Recreating the data volume is no longer required to stop an in-place-upgraded node from capturing.
Turning replication ON for a site that has been running without it
Supported as of LocalDb 0.2.0. Set the keys on both nodes and restart both (see the stop-and-start-together rule below — this is a pair-wide change, not a rolling one). Existing rows are carried across:
- Pre-existing rows are baselined automatically. ScadaBridge registers every replicated table
with
baselineExistingRows: true. Capture is change-data-capture, so rows written while the node had no triggers appear in neither the oplog nor__localdb_row_version— and LocalDb's snapshot resync streams from that ledger. Baselining seeds the ledger for those rows at the LWW floor (HLC0, stamped with the node's own id) and flags a snapshot resync, so the peer actually receives them. Copying one node's database onto the other beforehand is no longer necessary. - What the floor means for conflicts. Every genuine HLC is a UTC millisecond shifted left 16
bits, so it is strictly greater than
0: a baselined row loses to any real remote write of the same key and wins only where the peer holds no version of that key at all. The one ambiguous case is both nodes baselining the same key (e.g. both were restored from the same legacy file) — both hold HLC0and the node-id tie-break decides. That is convergent but arbitrary as to which content survives, so if the two files may disagree on a key, start both nodes from one node's database. - Seeding is idempotent (
ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING), so a row that already has a genuine version keeps it and no snapshot is flagged. Booting with baselining on every start is free after the first. - The flag is per-table as of LocalDb 0.3.0. Turning replication on for the first time still
seeds all ten tables at once, so the flagged set is every registered table and the pair exchanges
an ordinary full snapshot — that part is unchanged, so a site whose
site_eventstable is at its 1 GB cap should still be purged before the first enable, and one slow first sync expected. What changes is every later edit: adding an eleventh table toSiteLocalDbSetup.ReplicatedTableson a site that is already replicating now snapshots that one table, where through 0.2.x the single per-database flag re-streamed all eleven in full, in both directions at once. Upgrading a replicating pair to 0.3.0 in place is a no-op for this: the ten tables are already ledgered, so nothing seeds and nothing is flagged. - Mixed 0.2.x/0.3.0 versions still sync. Scoped snapshots are negotiated per session by capability, and a peer that does not advertise it is sent a full snapshot — so the pin bump does not have to be simultaneous for replication's sake. (It still has to be simultaneous for the stop-and-start-together rule below, which is a separate constraint.)
Turning replication back OFF is likewise a both-nodes change: deregistration must be symmetric, because the sync handshake compares the two nodes' registered-table digests fail-closed — a node that drops a table its peer still replicates stops syncing with a schema-mismatch error rather than diverging silently. Turning it on again later re-baselines, which is what makes the ledger prune on deregistration safe.
Reading the replication backlog — the daily site_events purge burst
The site health report carries LocalDbReplicationConnected and LocalDbOplogBacklog (nullable —
null means "no reading", not "disconnected with an empty backlog"), and the same numbers export
as the localdb_* Prometheus series (localdb_oplog_depth is the backlog gauge). A healthy pair
sits at a backlog of roughly zero, so a sudden spike naturally reads as a replication problem.
One expected spike is not a problem: the daily site_events retention purge. site_events is
one of the ten replicated tables, and its retention DELETE is captured by CDC exactly like an
ordinary write — by design, since LocalDb Phase 2 there is deliberately no purge-exemption path
(the same property that makes a mass DELETE dangerous, which is why ReplaceAllAsync was deleted
rather than reinstated). One oplog row is therefore queued per deleted event, and the backlog jumps
by the size of the batch the tick deleted.
The spike is bounded per tick (register row 34, measured:
docs/plans/2026-08-15-site-events-purge-burst-measurement.md). One purge tick deletes at most
ScadaBridge:SiteEventLog:MaxPurgedRowsPerTick rows — default 250 000, across the retention
purge and the cap trim combined — so the height of the spike is a property of the configuration,
not of how much history had expired. That matters because the burst used to be unbounded: a full
1 GB event log holds ~2.73 million rows, and expiring all of them at once queued 2 731 947 oplog
rows, 2.7x LocalDb's MaxOplogRows (default 1 000 000) — enough for the maintenance tick to
prune the oplog and flag a full ten-table snapshot resync. A healthy peer blunts that (the oplog
drains while the purge runs — measured peak was 391 000, not 2.73 M), which is precisely the problem:
the old safety margin was a function of how fast the peer happened to be, and vanished when the peer
was down. Set MaxPurgedRowsPerTick to 0 to restore the old unbounded behaviour.
- When. Every
ScadaBridge:SiteEventLog:PurgeInterval(default 24 h), plus once at startup — except after a tick that hit the ceiling, which schedules the next tick afterScadaBridge:SiteEventLog:PurgeCatchUpInterval(default 5 minutes) instead. So a large backlog appears as a run of bounded spikes minutes apart rather than one huge one; a worst-case 2.73 M-row backlog converges in ~11 ticks ≈ 55 minutes. The cadence is anchored to the end of the previous purge, not to a wall-clock hour, so the burst lands at a different time of day after each failover or restart — do not expect it at a fixed hour. The storage-cap trim (default 1 GB) can produce the same shape off-schedule, and draws from the same per-tick budget. - Where it shows. Only on a node with replication configured — the rig's site-a. site-b/site-c have no capture triggers at all and report no backlog for a purge.
- What healthy looks like.
LocalDbReplicationConnectedstays true across the spike, and the backlog drains back to ~0 as the peer acks the batch. Measured on a loopback pair at ~10 800 tombstones/second, so a full 250 000-row tick drains in well under a minute (delta messages are bounded byLocalDb:Replication:MaxBatchBytes, default 2 MB, and secondarily byMaxBatchSize). No dead letters, no schema-mismatch errors. - What is actually wrong.
LocalDbReplicationConnectedfalse while the backlog climbs, a backlog that keeps rising across successive readings rather than draining, or a backlog that never returns near zero between bursts. Those point at the sync stream — an ApiKey mismatch (fail-closed: the pair simply stops converging), an unreachable peer, or an asymmetric registered-table set.
Correlating it in the log. When a purge on a replication-enabled node actually deletes rows it logs an Information line next to the purge count:
Purged 41230 events older than 30 days
Purged 41230 site_events rows on a replication-enabled node — a transient LocalDb oplog backlog
of up to that many rows is expected while the deletes replicate to the peer. It drains on its own;
LocalDbReplicationConnected staying true with the backlog returning to ~0 is the healthy signature.
A tick deletes at most 250000 rows, so the spike is bounded by that number rather than by how much
history had expired.
An unreplicated node logs only the first line. If a backlog spike has no such line near it in the active node's log, the purge is not the explanation and the spike is worth investigating.
A tick that hit the ceiling adds a Warning, rate-limited to one line per 15 minutes so a converging backlog does not flood the log:
Event log purge stopped at its per-tick ceiling of 250000 rows (250000 deleted); expired events
remain and the next purge runs in 00:05:00 instead of 1.00:00:00.
Every hit — throttled line or not — increments the counter
scadabridge_site_event_log_purge_ceiling_hits. Read the counter's shape, not a single hit: a
short run of hits that stops is a backlog converging (normal, e.g. the first purge after enabling
replication on a long-running site); hits that never stop mean the site writes events faster than
one paced tick can purge, i.e. MaxPurgedRowsPerTick or PurgeCatchUpInterval is mis-sized for
that site's event rate.
Two dashboard surfaces make this reviewable rather than a log-archaeology exercise (register row 33):
- The "Replication backlog" badge on the site tile of the Health dashboard. It is deliberately
a sustained signal, not a bare threshold: the badge appears only once the backlog has stayed
above
ScadaBridge:HealthMonitoring:LocalDbBacklogThreshold(default 1000) continuously forScadaBridge:HealthMonitoring:LocalDbBacklogSustainedFor(default 15 minutes). The daily purge burst described above drains in seconds to a couple of minutes, so it never reaches the dwell and never badges the site — which is the entire reason the dwell exists. The per-tick ceiling reinforces that rather than threatening it: pacing lowers the spike (250 000 rows maximum instead of an unbounded 2.7 M) at the cost of more ticks, and a 250 000-row tick was measured draining in well under a minute — even allowing 10x for a real inter-node link that is ~4 minutes, against a 15-minute dwell and a 5-minute gap to the next tick. (The unpaced 2.73 M burst drained in 6.0 minutes on loopback: inside the dwell, but with only 2.5x of margin, so a materially slower link would have badged.) A bare threshold would fire once a day on every replicated site and be ignored within a week. The dwell is validated to be at least oneReportInterval, since a shorter window could be satisfied by a single sample and would collapse back into a bare threshold. - The "LocalDb Replication Backlog" trend chart in the dashboard's per-site Site Health Trends panel, backed by the KPI history store (sampled every minute, retained 90 days raw / 365 days hourly). This is what answers the question a point-in-time reading cannot: did that spike drain? A past purge burst appears as a spike that returns to ~0; a real fault appears as a level that never comes back down.
Both surfaces are silent on an unreplicated site, by design. LocalDbOplogBacklog and
LocalDbReplicationConnected are nullable, and null means "no reading", never zero. The KPI
sampler therefore writes no sample at all rather than a fabricated 0, so site-b/site-c show an
empty chart rather than a flat zero line, and they never accumulate the dwell anchor the badge
keys off. A gap in those series means "not replicated / not reporting" — which is the truth. Note
that false and null differ for the connected flag: a configured link that is DOWN samples as 0,
while no link at all samples as nothing.
Site Pair Upgrades — stop and start BOTH nodes together
A rolling upgrade of a site pair, one node at a time, is no longer supported. It worked while
the bespoke replicator kept a legacy SfBufferSnapshot compatibility handler so a new standby
could still apply an old active node's monolithic snapshot. LocalDb Phase 2 deleted that handler
along with the replicator, so a mixed-version pair has no common replication path: the two nodes
will run, but they will not converge, and the divergence is silent.
Stop both nodes of a site pair, upgrade both, then start both.
A release that adds a column to a replicated table is the same constraint, enforced louder.
ReplicatedTable.ComputeDigest hashes every column name and declared type, and the sync handshake
compares those digests fail-closed — so a mixed-version pair whose builds disagree about a table's
columns does not diverge silently, it refuses to sync with a LocalDbSchemaMismatchException.
Stopping and starting both nodes together, which is already the rule above, is the whole fix; no
manual trigger or oplog migration is needed, because RegisterReplicated re-reads
PRAGMA table_info on every boot and rebuilds the capture triggers (DROP + CREATE) over the
current column set. The site schema's own AddColumnIfMissing runs before registration on that
same boot, so a node picks up the new columns and the matching triggers in one start.
(Most recent instance: external_systems gained max_retries / retry_delay_ms for the
per-system store-and-forward retry policy.)
Related bound — do not leave one node of a pair offline for long. A node absent for longer than
LocalDb:Replication:TombstoneRetention (default 7 days) can resurrect deleted rows when
it rejoins: deletes replicate as HLC-ordered tombstones, and once a tombstone is pruned there is
nothing left to suppress the stale row the returning node still holds. Within the retention window
a rejoin is safe and self-correcting (verified live: a node stopped and restarted mid-load rejoined
with both nodes byte-identical and zero duplicates). Beyond it, rebuild the returning node's
database from its peer rather than letting it rejoin.
Central-Site Communication
Three transports cross the boundary, not one — all now gRPC or HTTP; Akka ClusterClient was removed in Phase 4 of the ClusterClient→gRPC migration (2026-07-23), and Akka remoting no longer crosses the boundary at all:
- gRPC command/control — both directions, on sticky-failover channel pairs, dialled directly (no
receptionist, no "active central" to identify — each side dials both of the peer's node endpoints):
- Site → central to the central-hosted
CentralControlService(GrpcCentralTransport): the site lists the central nodes' gRPC endpoints inScadaBridge:Communication:CentralGrpcEndpoints(e.g.http://scadabridge-central-a:8083, the central'sCentralGrpcPort, default 8083 — direct h2c, not via Traefik, which is HTTP/1 only). A Site node must list at least one; central nodes leave it empty. - Central → site to the site-hosted
SiteCommandService(GrpcSiteTransport): central dials the site'sGrpcNodeAAddress/GrpcNodeBAddress(from the Site entity), NodeA→NodeB failover.
- Site → central to the central-hosted
- gRPC streaming + audit pull — real-time data and audit/telemetry pull on the site-hosted
SiteStreamService. Note the direction is inverted from the data flow: each site node hosts the server onGrpcPort(default 8083, h2c) and central dials in. - Plain HTTP — the deploy config itself, fetched by the site with a per-deployment token.
gRPC control-plane preshared key (required)
Every site node must set ScadaBridge:Communication:GrpcPsk, and central must hold the same
value for that site. StartupValidator refuses to boot a site node without it, deliberately:
the gate is fail-closed, so an unset key would leave the node joined, healthy-looking and
answering heartbeats while refusing every gRPC call — no live subscriptions, no audit pull, no
cached-telemetry ingest.
| Side | Where the key lives |
|---|---|
| Site node (both nodes of the pair, identical) | ScadaBridge:Communication:GrpcPsk, in production ${secret:SB-GRPC-PSK-<siteId>} |
| Central | secret SB-GRPC-PSK-<siteId> in its store — or ScadaBridge:Communication:SitePsks:<siteId> |
The store is the source that matters in production, because sites are added at runtime and their
keys cannot be enumerated in configuration at boot; SitePsks covers a host running without a
master key (the docker rig) and one-off pins.
One key per site, never one for the fleet: a compromised site must not yield another site's
key. And never share it with LocalDb:Replication:ApiKey — that authenticates the pair partner
for database replication, a different trust relationship on the same listener.
Rotation: set the new value on both sides, then restart the pair (pairs restart together
anyway — see above). Upgrading to a build that has this gate requires seeding the key first,
including in the on-host deploy/ overlays.
The key is a bearer token over plaintext h2c, so it is readable and replayable by anyone on the path. That is the accepted posture today — the same trusted-network assumption the boundary already made, now with authentication rather than none. TLS on these listeners is follow-on hardening and needs no change to the key design.
Scaling Guidelines
Target Scale
- 10 sites maximum per central cluster
- 500 machines (instances) total across all sites
- 75 tags per machine (37,500 total tag subscriptions)
Resource Requirements
| Component | CPU | RAM | Disk | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Central node | 4 cores | 8 GB | 50 GB | SQL Server is separate |
| Site node | 2 cores | 4 GB | 20 GB | SQLite databases grow with S&F |
| SQL Server | 4 cores | 16 GB | 100 GB | Shared across central cluster |
Network Bandwidth
- Health reports: ~1 KB per site per 30 seconds = negligible
- Tag value updates: Depends on data change rate; OPC UA subscription-based
- Deployment artifacts: One-time burst per deployment (varies by config size)
- Debug view streaming: ~500 bytes per attribute change per subscriber
Dual-Node Failure Recovery
Scenario: Both Nodes Down
- First node starts: Forms a single-node cluster (
min-nr-of-members = 1). - Central: Reconnects to SQL Server, reads deployment state, becomes operational.
- Site: Opens SQLite databases, rebuilds Instance Actors from persisted configs, resumes S&F retries.
- Second node starts: Joins the existing cluster as standby.
Automatic Recovery
No manual intervention required for dual-node failure. The first node to start will:
- Form the cluster
- Take over all singletons
- Begin processing immediately
- Accept the second node when it joins