dohertj2/ScadaBridge
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 42 Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Design a TLS production profile for Traefik, Akka remoting and gRPC #64

New Issue
Open
opened 2026-11-06 15:24:42 -05:00 by dohertj2 · 0 comments
dohertj2 commented 2026-11-06 15:24:42 -05:00
Owner
Copy Link
Copy Source

Register row 128 (deferred-work register).

Traefik, Akka remoting and the gRPC h2c listeners are all plaintext; only gRPC command/control and stream boundaries carry per-site PSK auth, and Akka remoting is unauthenticated. A deployable profile (Traefik entrypoint certs, Akka enable-ssl + secure cookie, gRPC over h2/TLS with PSK retained, cert distribution for 8+ nodes) has never been designed end to end. Medium for any non-lab network.

Revisit trigger (from register): First non-lab deployment (any network not wholly inside the plant security boundary).

Current state: Accepted for the trusted lab/plant network; not designed.
Origin: 2026-10-21 system review (docs/plans/2026-10-21-system-review-remediation.md), carried from prior reviews.

Source: docs/plans/2026-07-08-deferred-work-register.md row 128

Register row 128 (deferred-work register). Traefik, Akka remoting and the gRPC h2c listeners are all plaintext; only gRPC command/control and stream boundaries carry per-site PSK auth, and Akka remoting is unauthenticated. A deployable profile (Traefik entrypoint certs, Akka `enable-ssl` + secure cookie, gRPC over h2/TLS with PSK retained, cert distribution for 8+ nodes) has never been designed end to end. Medium for any non-lab network. **Revisit trigger (from register):** First non-lab deployment (any network not wholly inside the plant security boundary). **Current state:** Accepted for the trusted lab/plant network; not designed. Origin: 2026-10-21 system review (`docs/plans/2026-10-21-system-review-remediation.md`), carried from prior reviews. Source: `docs/plans/2026-07-08-deferred-work-register.md` row 128
dohertj2 added the type:featurepriority:p2migrated labels 2026-11-06 15:24:42 -05:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Branch/Tag Specified
Branches Tags
Labels
Clear labels
blocked
Blocked by dependency or external hold
 cross-repo
Needs coordinated change in another family repo (wire contract etc.)
 migrated
Migrated from a markdown backlog (2026-11 standardization)
 priority:p0
Must-have / blocking
 priority:p1
High priority
 priority:p2
Normal priority
 priority:p3
Low priority / nice to have
 type:bug
Defect in shipped behaviour
 type:debt
Technical debt / hygiene
 type:deploy-gate
Rollout/deploy/migration step not yet done on an environment
 type:docs
Documentation work
 type:feature
Feature implementation
 type:followup
Follow-up deferred from a plan, PR or gate
 type:infra
Infrastructure and scaffolding
 type:review-finding
Unfixed finding from an architecture/code review
 type:test
Test work
No Label migrated priority:p2 type:feature
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
dohertj2 (dohertj2)
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: dohertj2/ScadaBridge#64
Delete Branch "%!s()"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?