SiteReconciliationActor's node-STARTUP fetch healed the config FILE but never the
RUNTIME. Instance Actors are created from exactly two paths -- the Deployment
Manager's boot-time SQLite load and an explicit deploy/enable command -- and the
reconcile pass runs AFTER that boot load has already read storage. So a config
reconcile restored started no actor: an enabled, successfully-deployed instance
whose config was missing at boot (lost volume, first boot after a restore,
rehomed data dir) stayed dead until the NEXT restart, whose load finally picked
it up. Proven live on site-a 2026-08-15: "Reconcile: fetched + stored config"
with no "InstanceActor started" after it, and a debug snapshot answering
instanceNotFound.
The pass now raises a fire-and-forget EnsureInstanceStartedCommand (new Commons
Deployment message) for every ENABLED instance it healed, routed through the
deployment-manager singleton PROXY so Instance Actors stay under the singleton no
matter which node's reconcile found the gap.
The handler is deliberately advisory:
- idempotent -- no-op when the actor is already running, which both nodes'
reconcile actors legitimately trigger for the same instance;
- enabled-state-aware -- it re-reads the durable row, which is the authority on
both the config body and enabled/disabled, so a disable landing after the
fetch still wins and the instance stays stopped;
- it defers to any in-flight deploy/redeploy/warm for the instance, which keeps
the deploy gate's ordering guarantees and the all-or-nothing-per-instance rule
intact -- this never applies a config, it only starts one already persisted;
- a missing row is a quiet no-op, the normal case on an unreplicated site whose
peer node healed its own file.
The heal is no longer silent: a successful reconcile start emits a Warning log
line and an operational `deployment` site event, because reaching it means the
node booted without a config for an instance that should have been running.
Phase 4 of the ClusterClient -> gRPC migration deleted the Akka transports
but left the naming behind: `ClusterClientSiteAuditClient` was transport-
agnostic and worked unchanged, so it survived the deletion under a name
that now describes a transport the repo no longer has. Same for a scatter
of doc-comments still framing gRPC as "the new transport" beside an Akka
one that is gone.
Renames it to `SiteCommunicationAuditClient` (and its test file) and
rewrites the stale comments to describe the single transport that exists.
Also tightens CLAUDE.md: drops the self-describing directory listing and
the 27-component enumeration in favour of the non-obvious parts only.
Behaviour-neutral: names and prose only. Recorded as the Phase 4
follow-up in docs/plans/2026-07-22-clusterclient-to-grpc-plan.md.
Joseph Doherty