refactor(sf,site): both stores take ILocalDb instead of a connection string

Tasks 5 and 6 of the Phase 2 plan, committed together because their test
fallout is entangled — several fixtures construct both stores.

StoreAndForwardStorage and SiteStorageService now take ILocalDb. Connections
come from ILocalDb.CreateConnection(), which hands out an already-open,
pragma-configured connection carrying the zb_hlc_next() UDF the capture triggers
call; a raw connection would lack the UDF and every write to a replicated table
would fail closed. Deleted with the connection strings: S&F's
EnsureDatabaseDirectoryExists and its per-open busy_timeout pragma, and the site
service's BusyTimeoutFloorSeconds normalization — LocalDb owns all of it now.

DI: AddSiteRuntime's string overload is gone (nothing left to supply), so the
Host calls the no-arg form. ScadaBridge:Database:SiteDbPath and
StoreAndForwardOptions.SqliteDbPath survive only as the migrator's source
locations in Tasks 8/9.

Two things the plan did not anticipate, both worth reading:

1. FOUND A REAL LATENT DEFECT, from Phase 1, now fixed. The plan assumed
   directory creation simply moved to LocalDb along with file ownership. It did
   not: the LocalDb library never creates the parent directory, and
   SqliteLocalDb opens the file eagerly in its constructor — so a missing
   directory is a hard boot failure ("SQLite Error 14: unable to open database
   file"), not a degraded start. The default site config points at the RELATIVE
   path ./data/site-localdb.db, so any site node without a pre-existing data/
   directory fails to boot. The docker rig escapes only because its volume mount
   happens to create /app/data — a coincidence that would have hidden this until
   a bare-metal or fresh deployment. This has been latent since Phase 1 made
   LocalDb:Path required; deleting S&F's EnsureDatabaseDirectoryExists here
   would have widened it. Re-established the guarantee at the layer that now
   owns the path (SiteLocalDbDirectory.Ensure, called before AddZbLocalDb) and
   pinned it with SiteLocalDbDirectoryTests. Non-vacuity is not assumed: two
   tests written against the wrong assumption failed with exactly this
   SQLite Error 14 before the fix existed.

2. Test fallout was ~7x the plan's estimate. The plan named "fixtures" in one
   project; the constructor change actually reaches 40 files across 7 test
   projects, and most used Mode=Memory;Cache=Shared — which LocalDb has no
   equivalent for, so every one had to move to a real temp file. Rather than
   copy the Phase 1 TestLocalDb fixture into 7 projects, added a shared
   tests/ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.TestSupport library (not a test project) so the
   WAL-sidecar cleanup and the "real, not stubbed" rationale live in one place.

Retargeted rather than deleted, in both directions: the S&F WAL test now asserts
against the LocalDb-backed store (WAL genuinely is LocalDb's job), while the
directory-creation test moved to Host.Tests (that guarantee is NOT LocalDb's).
SiteStorageServiceTests.Initialize_EnablesWalJournalMode got the same treatment.
DeploymentManagerMediumFindingsTests induced a persistence failure via an
unopenable path, which no longer reaches the assertion since the fixture now
throws first; it induces the same failure shape via an uninitialized store.

Verified: full solution build 0 warnings; SiteRuntime 532, Host 318,
AuditLog 355, ExternalSystemGateway 142, HealthMonitoring 97,
StoreAndForward 153 — 1597 passed, 0 failed.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01BL2Vu1ESDQ9SCN4gVKkdts

tests/ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.SiteRuntime.Tests/Actors/SiteReconciliationActorTests.cs

@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ using ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.Commons.Messages.Deployment;
 using ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.SiteRuntime.Actors;
 using ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.SiteRuntime.Deployment;
 using ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.SiteRuntime.Persistence;
+using ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.TestSupport;
 
 namespace ZB.MOM.WW.ScadaBridge.SiteRuntime.Tests.Actors;
 
@@ -22,20 +23,28 @@ public class SiteReconciliationActorTests : TestKit, IDisposable
     private const string NodeId = "node-a";
 
     private readonly SiteStorageService _storage;
-    private readonly string _dbFile;
+    private readonly TestLocalDb _localDb;
 
     public SiteReconciliationActorTests()
     {
-        _dbFile = Path.Combine(Path.GetTempPath(), $"site-reconcile-test-{Guid.NewGuid():N}.db");
+        // SiteStorageService takes an ILocalDb now; LocalDb has no in-memory mode, so the
+        // fixture is a real temp file (deleted in Dispose, after the TestKit shutdown).
+        _localDb = TestLocalDb.CreateTemp("site-reconcile-test");
         _storage = new SiteStorageService(
-            $"Data Source={_dbFile}", Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions.NullLogger<SiteStorageService>.Instance);
+            _localDb.Db, Microsoft.Extensions.Logging.Abstractions.NullLogger<SiteStorageService>.Instance);
         _storage.InitializeAsync().GetAwaiter().GetResult();
     }
 
     void IDisposable.Dispose()
     {
+        // Shut the actor system down FIRST: a reconcile continuation may still be
+        // writing through the ILocalDb, which must outlive the actors.
         Shutdown();
-        try { File.Delete(_dbFile); } catch { /* cleanup */ }
+        // Then dispose — the master connection anchors the WAL, so the sidecars cannot
+        // be removed while it is open.
+        var path = _localDb.Path;
+        _localDb.Dispose();
+        TestLocalDb.DeleteFiles(path);
     }
 
     private IActorRef CreateReconciliationActor(